It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Evolution Cruncher
actually I have done a little research on this tax deal. there are certain codes to follow in paying taxes.
when does Hovind have time to debate anyone online?
The opponents on these four takes are all professors, college professors.
and they all look pretty dumb whenever hovind debates them.
In order to make a drawing of something that existed but was never seen, what needs to be done in order to make an accurate drawing?
How is that evidence for the co-existence of man and dinosaurs?
Originally posted by Evolution Cruncher
well in order to get drawings of what dinosaur skin looked like, you kinda need a live dinosaur to do that. and why would someone draw dinosuars and humans together on pottery and stones? thats just dumb if they were making it up.
EC
All you need is some bones, imagination or co-incidence.
Originally posted by Evolution Cruncher
All you need is some bones, imagination or co-incidence.
imagination? thats evolution for you right there. I was talking about the fossilized dinosaur skin that had the same circle patterns as the one on the drawing. that does not show imagination, that shows a witness.
EC
Originally posted by Evolution Cruncher
All you need is some bones, imagination or co-incidence.
imagination? thats evolution for you right there. I was talking about the fossilized dinosaur skin that had the same circle patterns as the one on the drawing. that does not show imagination, that shows a witness.
Originally posted by Evolution Cruncher
well in order to get drawings of what dinosaur skin looked like, you kinda need a live dinosaur to do that.
and why would someone draw dinosuars and humans together on pottery and stones? thats just dumb if they were making it up.
I was talking about the fossilized dinosaur skin that had the same circle patterns as the one on the drawing.
is there really a fossilized dino skin?
Originally posted by Evolution Cruncher
How is that evidence for the co-existence of man and dinosaurs?
well in order to get drawings of what dinosaur skin looked like, you kinda need a live dinosaur to do that.
and why would someone draw dinosuars and humans together on pottery and stones? thats just dumb if they were making it up.
Originally posted by riley
you able to actually PROVE this fossilised dinosaur skin exists?
Originally posted by ozmorphus
I think God may have made the dinosaurs first before he made Adam and Eve.
Perhaps the dinosaurs weren't allowed into the Garden of Eden and when Adam and Eve sinned perhaps God caused the dinosaurs to start to die out because he knew that us humans would soon start to populate the Earth?
It is imposible for dinos and man to co-exist because of a 65 million year gap you may have heard about. man has onley existed on earth for maby 1 to 2 million years, depending on what you define as man.please write back.
Originally posted by Evolution Cruncher
im not sure if thsi response is going to be considered a direct response to the last post.
how come all the sites that you use are correct?
it seems to be that all the sites I refer to are wrong, according to you.
what makes KentHovind a liar?
why is it impossible for dinosaurs to have existed with man?
a lot of things were taught in the past as fact and are now proven wrong.
I think that is where the evolution theory is going. I think that it is a wrong.
let me ask you all something about Dr Hovind.
Why is it that when he debates professors and other "scientists", the people he debates never have a rebuttle that sounds convincing? howcome he always makes them look stupid? I only have 4 debates on tape, but all of them are won by Dr Hovind. he may not be right, but his opponents can never come up with an explanation as to why and how things are the way they are.
they never come up with a good explanation.
Hovind may be a liar to you all. but he certain doesnt look like one in front of a crowd, especially when he is debating someone on the subject of which they speak.
EC