It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Joshm2u
where is the proof that dinosaurs lived 65 million years ago?
Originally posted by Joshm2u
where is the proof that dinosaurs lived 65 million years ago?
Originally posted by Joshm2u
1) carbon dating is not accurate. it is only good for substances under 4,000 years old. the earth was different when it was first created. there probbaly wasnt as much UV light from the sun entering our atmosphere, which is what converts the nirtogen into carbon 14
Originally posted by Joshm2u
it is only good for substances under 4,000 years old.
the earth was different when it was first created. there probbaly wasnt as much UV light from the sun entering our atmosphere, which is what converts the nirtogen into carbon 14
what if humans were bigger back then...giants maybe. the bible referes to giants, here is one verse.....genesis 6:4 "There were giants in the earth in those days"
I'll get back to this on later but EC Link 3 debunks four five six. Site one with the malachite man thru the hand print is bunk. The hand print is an obvious fake. I'll get back to the others on that site later. Also number two (the one on the pauxleys prints) is an admitted fraud and has been covered over and over on these forums.
first paragraph
Several locations reveal thousands of fossilized worms that are perfectly three dimensional. If anything should be mashed flat it would be worms, but they are not. Obviously, very rapid lithification is required in order to preserve such astonishing detail.
from talkorigins
The skeletons are the same bones as the discredited Moab man bones, apparently with skeletons from eight nearby Indian burials added (Kuban 1998).
All details given in the account are apparently false. The bones were found fifteen feet deep in soft, unconsolidated sand. They were clearly intrusive (i.e., buried there long after the sediments were laid down). The Dakota Formation is approximately 90-115 million years old, straddling the Early and Late Cretaceous. Dinosaur National Monument is in the Morrison Formation, which is Jurassic (Kuban 1998).
The people making claims about Malachite Man have not been cooperative in supplying information that might be used to verify their claim. This would be surprising if they thought their claims could actually be verified.
Originally posted by jake1997
You and I have investigated it together Nygdan. We came to the conclusion that the dating methods are not in compliance with the scientific method.
They are based on assumptions
Originally posted by Evolution Cruncher
ok I have a question on the dinosaurs and man co-existing. people drew on pots and stones, dinosaurs with circle patterns, how would they know if it had circle patterns on the skin without ever seeing one?
I would say that they had to see one in order to know what the skin looked like.
also as josh mentioned earlier in this thread, tha Ica Stones show Man and dinosaurs together, if man and dinsoaurs are drawn together, it was probably because they were together alive.
also what about the legends of people slaying dragons? some are probably false or fairytales, but im sure at least one of them are true.
Malachite Man
short refutation
The hammer is encrusted with calcium carbonate, which can happen quickly. The fossils are in nearby rocks, not part of the material encrusting the hammer. There is no evidence that the hammer is more than a few decades old.
what about the blood cells found in the Trex bones. blood cells arent going to last for millions of years unless its frozen and it wasnt.
are these wrong? if they are why are they considered wrong?
also carbon dating does not work unless the earth has reached equalibrium of radioactive carbon 14.
Lordling
I see plentiful evidence for human - dinosaur coexistence, and the information provided in your furnished links merely adds support to my, already held conclusion, that dinosaurs existed for much longer than mainstream science cares to admit.
Jake1997
Can you tell me what assumptions the Scientific Method leaves room for?
quote: Originally posted by Joshm2u
where is the proof that dinosaurs lived 65 million years ago?
There are two bits of evidence 1. Carbon Dating and 2. Our species exists!!! There is no way we could compete with dinosaurs even with their tiny brains( for reference think of the size of a young Earth Creationist's brain i.e. Kent Hovind)
Originally posted by Evolution Cruncher
I dont know how many times I have to explain carbon dating, it doesnt work. carbon dating does not work at all. its not accurate no matter how old the object is.
as for surviving against a dinosaur, the bible points out that there were giants in teh earth before the flood and some after.
Originally posted by Evolution Cruncher
here is a link that shows a few things that were found that contradict the geologic collumn.
here is another
...
are these wrong? if they are why are they considered wrong?
From the www.bible.ca site
Malachite Man
Fossil remains from at least 10 perfectly modern humans (5 males, 4 females, 1 infant) have been excavated fifty feet down from the surface, within the Dakota Sandstone, the same formation found at Dinosaur National Monument, famous for its dinosaurs.