It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Evolution Cruncher
the thing with God is, he is eternal. if you know what that means, you will know that God was not created by anyone or anything, he is unlimited and unefffected by all things. God wouldnt be God if he had to have someone create him. also, if the infinite God could fit in my little three pound brain, he wouldnt be worth worshipping.
I have yet to meet a scientist that isn't an evolutionist.
I have yet to meet a creationist that isn't trying to be a scientist.
Originally posted by Evolution Cruncher
I have yet to meet a scientist that isn't an evolutionist.
I have yet to meet a creationist that isn't trying to be a scientist.
well you might need to look a little harder, as far as I know, 45% of the scientists in america are creationists. (im pretty sure it was just america, if not than the whole world)
and only 55% are evolutionists.
Originally posted by Evolution Cruncher
well you might need to look a little harder, as far as I know, 45% of the scientists in america are creationists. (im pretty sure it was just america, if not than the whole world)
and only 55% are evolutionists.
and just because everyone believes a certain theory does not make it true. most people dont understand that statement.
Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
Here is the sublink of how to collect $250,000 if you can prove to these idiots that evolution exist:
www.godrules.net...
I love the fact that TWO THIRDS of the challenge are revisions
Originally posted by shaunybaby
the springbok antelope has a warning/defence against predators. when a predator is near their warning sign to the rest of the antelope is to spring in to the air, hence their name. however, surely if god made everything to be vegetarian, then there is no need for the spring/jump, as the antelope would have had no predators. apparently animals only became non-vegetarians after 'sin', and in which case means god did not give that 'jump/spring' technique to the antelope as it would have been completly unnecessary. therefore, over time it is more logical to believe that the antelope developed this spring technique to warn others of predators. also it is also more likely that at one time all animals were not vegetarian, and that the antelopes technique is honed over time, of which is now a distinctive part of them.
so i guess my question to the non-evolutionists out there is:
why, when god created an animal kingdom of pure vegetarians, does an antelope develope a distinctive hallmark that tells others of their species that there is a predator (a non-vegetarian) nearby?
Originally posted by Evolution Cruncher
as far as I know, 45% of the scientists in america are creationists.
Originally posted by shaunybaby
Originally posted by shaunybaby
the springbok antelope has a warning/defence against predators. when a predator is near their warning sign to the rest of the antelope is to spring in to the air, hence their name. however, surely if god made everything to be vegetarian, then there is no need for the spring/jump, as the antelope would have had no predators. apparently animals only became non-vegetarians after 'sin', and in which case means god did not give that 'jump/spring' technique to the antelope as it would have been completly unnecessary. therefore, over time it is more logical to believe that the antelope developed this spring technique to warn others of predators. also it is also more likely that at one time all animals were not vegetarian, and that the antelopes technique is honed over time, of which is now a distinctive part of them.
so i guess my question to the non-evolutionists out there is:
why, when god created an animal kingdom of pure vegetarians, does an antelope develope a distinctive hallmark that tells others of their species that there is a predator (a non-vegetarian) nearby?
i take it no one can actually answer? maybe from a creationist point of view there is no answer, the only way to explain is evolution.
Originally posted by Evolution Cruncher
I have yet to meet a scientist that isn't an evolutionist.
I have yet to meet a creationist that isn't trying to be a scientist.
well you might need to look a little harder, as far as I know, 45% of the scientists in america are creationists. (im pretty sure it was just america, if not than the whole world)
and only 55% are evolutionists.
and just because everyone believes a certain theory does not make it true. most people dont understand that statement.
EC