It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Odium
What can I say, other then I'm glad I didn't end up against the Vagabond or thelibra in my first round? At least I get rid of one of the heavy hitters, although Jake is doin' a good job at the moment in our topic.
Originally posted by Amorymeltzer
What were you thinking of, Vagabond?
Being able to debate the side opposite to your own views is one of the best skills you could ever have in life.
[edit on 6/26/2005 by Amorymeltzer]
Originally posted by The Vagabond
I'd be smoking a lot less though if it WAS a double elimination tournament.
Originally posted by Amorymeltzer
Originally posted by The Vagabond
I'd be smoking a lot less though if it WAS a double elimination tournament.
What's a "double elimination tournament?"
Originally posted by The Vagabond
I wasn't -actually- thinking of anything different. The tournament structure is fine. I was joking about a double elimination tournament because I have such a tough first match. In a double elimination tournament nobody is out until they've lost twice, meaning that you can come off of a fluke loss or a bad first-round draw and rally for a win later. To actually use that system wouldn't do anything but reduce the odds of members staying in the tournament for the full duration though.
Originally posted by Amorymeltzer
Ahhh, I see vaga. That's very interesting. To work proper, I think, we'd have to have smaller amounts of debators. It, or something similar to it, could work out if we tried. I shall ponder.
At any rate, don't anyone forget about grudge matches!