Democrats calling for impeachment of Bush? About time..., page 1


Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 17-6-2005 @ 01:25 AM by sosuemetoo
Originally posted by GREGNOW
Here's the link. It's about time someone started holding this administration accountable.
news.yahoo.com.../ap/20050617/ap_on_go_co/downing_street_memo


I just posted on this link: www.abovetopsecret.com... and on a forum I moderate.

I don't think there's any possible way to impeach Bush and all that were responsible for this coverup. How do you impeach/get rid of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfield, Rice, Wolfowitz, etal? The Republican's have the majority of the Senate and the House. This is much worse (IMO) than Nixon and Clinton. So many people have died over a coverup.


reply posted on 17-6-2005 @ 06:05 AM by RANT
This appears to be what that's about (aka things you won't see on the "News").


Several members of Congress with a petition signed by 1 in 500 Americans stopped at the White House gates, refused to be heard by the President.

And not even an acknowledgement by the White House.

Scott, on another topic, has the President or anyone else from the administration responded to the letter sent last month by Congressman John Conyers and signed by dozens of members of the House of Representatives, regarding the Downing Street memo? Has the President or anyone else responded?

MR. McCLELLAN: Not that I'm aware of.

Q Why not?

MR. McCLELLAN: Why not? Because I think that this is an individual who voted against the war in the first place and is simply trying to rehash old debates that have already been addressed. And our focus is not on the past. It's on the future and working to make sure we succeed in Iraq.

These matters have been addressed, Elaine. I think you know that very well. The press --

Q Scott, 88 members of Congress signed that letter.

MR. McCLELLAN: The press -- the press have covered it, as well.

Q What do you say about them?

Q But, Scott, don't they deserve the courtesy of a response back?

MR. McCLELLAN: Again, this has been addressed. Go ahead.



reply posted on 18-6-2005 @ 08:01 PM by Passer By
Originally posted by Memorialday1999
And if a democrat was President now and in the last term I suspect you think things would be different? At least Bush was reading to children when he got news of 911 vs playing with them as someone like Clinton would have been. (oh did I just say that out loud ).

Whoever was President was going to have to react to 911 and we would have had some type of military action. I have not seen the democrats put there best foot forward either so frankly I think they need to just zip the lips and wait their turn, it is coming and they will rule again. Then lets see how well they do and how much better they think they are in dealing with this world.


Not at all, I actually was for the impeachment of the president. He is the f'n president! He can not lie, and if he is found out to lie, as the commander in cheif he should be stripped and hung IMO. What Clinton did was immoral, unethical and just a dirty trick to play on his wife, his family and the American people. It showed a huge lack of character. That said he didn't start an illegal war, he didn't remove America from the world stage(as anything other than the bad guy) and he hasn't taken your country from being a place of liberty and inovation into being what it is today. IMO, a very sad mockery of what your founding fathers seemed to want to create.

What does 911 have to do with Iraq? In afgani everyone was with America. On September 12 America had essentially the entire world with it. Today, it primarily stands alone. It isn't because the world turned Anti US, it is because the US, or at least it's governing body, seems to no longer stand for what it did. Invading a soverign nation like Iraq with, at best, flimsy evidense, ignoring what historically your allies were saying, ignoring the world community all the while flounting some sense of superiority while breaking all the rules and values free society has tried so hard to maintain - will never win you any friends.

See, you will never be able to see it the way I see it as I don't care which politician is in or out or how well they do. IMO, the very nature of government is an afront to human life. Humans don't wage war - governments do. You see one side and are used to arguing with people that see the other side. I may not see either side as well as you do your's, or the another person see's his/hers, but I see enough to know that Bush has done somethings that IMO he should be hung for treason and given to your enemies as a warning that if you do that to your president, imagine what you'll do to them if they bother you?
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^