It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Harlequin
Stealth - you yourself linked to the fact it was triggered by the pilot and not the hardware itself
Originally posted by jonesey_dude
I believe Concorde flew for nearly 35 years before its first crash.
And I believe there have been no Eurofighter or Rafale Crashes yet, but its early days really.
Originally posted by Icarus Rising
Sounds like a procedural mistake in the good Major's failure to reinitiate the system and go back through the checklist after turning off the engines, switching to aux power for maintenance, then turning the engines back on. Attitude indicators such as these, that the aircraft can't fly without, are way too important to make assumptions about when there is an interruption of the power-up sequence. In this case the assumption that they were still turned on resulted in the destruction of the aircraft. How much does one of those babies cost? The good Major may not get a chance to fly one again.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Pilot error is the biggest cause of plane crashes. Probably 80% of them are human related.
Originally posted by veritas 7
It really does'nt surprise me to hear that, Westpoint 23, is always straight to the defence of anything US.
Of course we know he is, American, and i would say he is obviously, very patriotic, which is not a bad thing at all! But he really does not like to hear anything negative about the good ol' US of A!!!
The Raptor is a fantastic aircraft, no doubt, but like everything built, it is not invincible, and just because it's American, does not mean that everything they do or build, is the best, because it is not, i can assure you!
Sorry if i have offended you Westpoint 23, but hey, that's life!!!
Originally posted by Zaphod58
The Raptor isn't invincible. The problem however is getting to knife fighting range against it. Between the AWACS coverage that's sure to be there, and the sensors on the Raptor itself, it's not easy to get close enough to dogfight one.
Originally posted by Figher Master FIN
Exactly... That's exactly what I think, the Raptor is good, it's very good... However We can't brag about it yet, not yet... It isn't even combat prooven...
Originally posted by Seekerof
FMF, simply put, your a broken record.
You keep talking and playing this game revolving around the cliche' of combat proven, when applied to the Raptor, and yet when you talk of any other aircraft, you do not mention combat proven. Interesting, no?
Hey, btw, is your beloved Gripen combat proven?
How about the SU-30 MKI?
How about EF-2000 Eurofighter?
Maybe the Rafale?
How about the J-10 or anything else the Chinese have built recently?
I'm not sure what your problem is here, but that combat proven cliche' you so love to use is becoming irrelevant and over-used. Again, you fail to take into account air-to-air simulations, like DERA, and actual in air combat environment testings, say versus 4 F-16s and 5 F-15s, etc.
Combat proven, bah!
seekerof
[edit on 14-8-2005 by Seekerof]
Originally posted by Zaphod58
So does everything else coming out now. There are so many "what if" scenarios out there, that if you thought about them all you'd never build an airplane, because you'd try to build one that could survive all the what ifs and you'd get one that didn't do anything, including fly.
Originally posted by Figher Master FIN
[
Well, that's what it's designed to do... Nobody have actualy prooven that the system works like that... The plane should have 1000 of test hours, not to mention the whole "combat-prooven" thing... And we don't know if: well the Chinese for instance build an EMP missile, with extra long range and a uppgrade the radar on their dear J-3... That way the Raptor wouldn't be invincible... The problem with the Raptor is that it relies too much on computers...
Originally posted by Zaphod58
If you're not talking about building planes why make a remark like this? This is ALL about building a plane against a specific threat, and you talk about how it relies too much on computers, which is about how it's built.