It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Harlequin
nixie are decoys - not like the nets designed to stop torp hits
also most USN ships carry limited nixie`s anyway - working along side the prarie/masker system
AN/SLQ-25 NIXIE
The Torpedo Countermeasures Transmitting Set AN/SLQ-25A, commonly referred to as Nixie, is a passive, electro-acoustic decoy system used to provide deceptive countermeasures against acoustic homing torpedoes. The AN/SLQ-25A employs an underwater acoustic projector housed in a streamlined body which is towed astern on a combination tow/signal-transfer coaxial cable. An onboard generated signal is used by the towed body to produce an acoustic signal to decoy the hostile torpedo away from the ship. The AN/SLQ-25A includes improved deceptive countermeasures capabilities. The AN/SLQ-25B includes improved deceptive countermeasures capabilities, a fiber optic display LAN, a torpedo alertment capability and a towed array sensor.
Modern acoustic towed decoys, such as the AN/SLQ-25 NIXIE and the older T-MK6 FANFAIR, employ electronic or electromechanical means to produce the required signals. The system provides an alternate target diversion for an enemy acoustic homing torpedo by stringing on cable a "noise maker", aft of the ship, which has the capability of producing a greater noise than the ship; thereby diverting the incoming torpedo from the ship to the "fish". The towed device receives the torpedoes ping frequency, amplifies it 2 to 3 times and sends it back to lure the torpedo away from the ship. They may be used in pairs or singularly.
Operators are cautioned not to attempt MC transmission with less then 1000 feet of fiber optic tow cable (fotc) deployed, and MC transmission should be terminated before retrieval of FOTC commences. On below deck installations, the cable guide doors, if installed, must be closed whenever more than 50 feet of cable is paid out. Open doors mat cause the FOTC to ride out of the sheave and become caught between the sheave and keeper roller, seriously damaging the FOTC. Although the tech manual states the launch/retrieval speeds for the system are between 10-25 knots, it is strongly suggested not to exceed 15 knots. At speeds in excess of 15 knots damage to tow cable can occur on some platforms. (DD, DDG 994 class and CG 47 class). The emergency non-powered payout procedure should only be used when power is lost to the winch and the tactical situation dictates deployment of the torpedo countermeasures system. Winch speed must be carefully controlled by braking during non-powered payout operations. If not monitored the winch will rotate at an extremely dangerous rate.
Originally posted by gooseuk
Pyros
I would have to say that you are a fool and so are the captains you speak of, that float around the oceans, the British Navy understand the threat from those boats and just how dangerous those craft can be when they are operated with even the most limited of skills.
Any military person that say they are not afraid of a possible enemy that in some cases can attack from no where are lairs, the US navy are investing in these loaned craft because they know just how much of a threat these craft are to their surface combatants, I can not be sure of the subs but diesel subs can be just as effective with subs as are with surface combatants.
I honestly can't believe the ignorance or the arrogance of some people or their idea of what their Military can do.
- Phil
Originally posted by gooseuk
Originally posted by Harlequin
nixie are decoys - not like the nets designed to stop torp hits
also most USN ships carry limited nixie`s anyway - working along side the prarie/masker system
I apologise but the sole purpose of the Nixie system is to stream it behind the naval vessel to try and decoy the torp/s into "leading" them away or leading them into hitting the nixie rather than the expensive vessel.
If that in itself isn't a means to prevent a torp scoring hits, I don't know what is?
- Phil
Originally posted by BillHicksRules
Gooseuk,
The change in the world scene was one of contributing factors to the abrupt ending of the Seawolf class and the change to the Virginia class.
From the UK's point of view, the sale of the Upholder class boats to Canada was a mistake in my opinion as they were (despite the incident on the HMCS Chicoutimi) and still are very good boats.
They could have bridged a gap until the Astutes are ready to go (I am still not sure about the capabilities of these boats, I am sure Orangetom or Paperplane can put me right)
Cheers
BHR
Originally posted by BillHicksRulesThe change in the world scene was one of contributing factors to the abrupt ending of the Seawolf class and the change to the Virginia class.
Originally posted by FredT
In fact the navy did not want any Seawolfs and wanted to cancel the program before any were delivered, but they were forced on the USN as part of several 'pork barrel" projects.
Originally posted by Figher Master FIN
Well, the subs are wery quiet and they have a nice advantage even though the carrier propably has planes made for "sub-destroying"... like the J-3...
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Its ok the Chinese are staring to build new nuclear subs too, they only have DE now cuz they did not have the know how and resources to build a nuke sub. All of their new class subs are nuclear so we just have to wait until they build more nuke subs and it will be just like the days of the cold war.