It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I can't think of sources at the moment but I'm pretty sure that there have been discoveries of pre-Hellenic sites in the area around Istambul/Constantinople and all along the respective coastlines.
This does not change the fact that it is Greece who is supposed to save the world and rule, as found here: "Then shall Greece be awaked first with her army/ so that she will fulfil her holy purpose.
Originally posted by NtinosActually, the prophecy suggests Turkey will switch teams and doublecross her allies in the West, I hope the translation was satisfactory enough to make that sentence clear.
or is it?
The prophecy is not as greek centered, as it is orthodox centered.
There is a reason the prophecy is focused on Greece. First of all, the monk is Greek, and the text was writeen for a greek audience.
This does not change the fact that it is Greece who is supposed to save the world and rule, as found here: "Then shall Greece be awaked first with her army/ so that she will fulfil her holy purpose.
To conquer without fight, her holy places/ which her enemies had conquered, and all the world acknowledges."
Regardless, someone else correctly identified the prophecy as jingoistic in nature. At this point in time, Greece has as much chance of solving such an issue then ruling the world as Bali.
Please, allow me to reprint the appropriate verse for you, and kindly note the bolded text...
Originally posted by Ntinos
I do not understand where you get the feeling that Greece will "save the world" or "rule the world". The only places Greece will rule (according to the prophecy) is her own neighboring space, not the world.
Then shall Greece be awaked first with her army/ so that she will fulfil her holy purpose.
To conquer without fight, her holy places/ which her enemies had conquered, and all the world acknowledges.
You are going out of your way to minimize Greece in regard this prophecy. In fact, in a backward way you essentially agree with me that Greece is a non-entity when it comes to the future. For she either rules the world or she does not. Is that not so?
Originally posted by Ntinos
Then please also allow me to comment on the text.As I have already mentioned, her holy purpose is to bring the lands of Constantinople and the Aegean part of Minor Asia back to Orthodoxy, and relieve the Patriarchate of Constantinople so that it may once more function like a patriarchate.
So you once again reinforce my previous position that Greece's role is of no importance.
Then shall the greek King, the chosen of the Lord/ which in everything shall be perfect and in the earth/ will rule with justice/ and the earth will take great delight in her constant peace.
This is not actually something new. Ever since 600 A.D byzantine monks have been prophesising about the great King Ioannes. Most notable is the prophecy of Emperor Leo the Wise (who was also a Saint, and not much of an Emperor since at his reign his father-in-law was in charge of everything in the Empire), which clearly states that the name of the most prophesised Emperor will be Ioannes. There are also very notable prophecies about the Emperor from St. Tarasius and Osios (= Minor Saint) Andreas.
is this of importance somehow?Since I neither believe in Catholicism or how men can make other men into an entity that the God of the bible never created, I have no use for any theological attachment to such positions, nor do I see the relevance to the prophecy.
If you belong to the Roman Catholic Church, then these are Saints the Roman Catholic Church recognises as Saints, since all of them lived before the schizm.
All right, this is where we part company, because I have mentioned nothing of the kind and so can only presume you are having conversations with yourself which explains all of your preamble.
As for the return of Constantinople to the Greeks, although you tend to see it as a point that declares the prophecy 'prejudiced' against the Turks, ....
You are going out of your way to minimize Greece in regard this prophecy. In fact, in a backward way you essentially agree with me that Greece is a non-entity when it comes to the future. For she either rules the world or she does not. Is that not so?
So you once again reinforce my previous position that Greece's role is of no importance.
is this of importance somehow?Since I neither believe in Catholicism or how men can make other men into an entity that the God of the bible never created, I have no use for any theological attachment to such positions, nor do I see the relevance to the prophecy.
All right, this is where we part company, because I have mentioned nothing of the kind and so can only presume you are having conversations with yourself which explains all of your preamble.
Decide then what it is to be that Greece is she does not rule the rule per the prophecy, same is of no consequence, nor can it be possible for her to conquer anything other than Lesbos, or
Originally posted by NtinosShe does not rule the world. Nowhere in the prophecy is this stated.
It is very evident from the above that she will rule the world.
Then shall Greece be awaked first with her army/ so that she will fulfil her holy purpose.
To conquer without fight, her holy places/ which her enemies had conquered, and all the world acknowledges.
Then shall the refuges with great delight/run to their places like flying eagles.
Then shall the greek King, the chosen of the Lord which in everything shall be perfect and in the earth/ will rule with justice/ and the earth will take great delight in her constant peace.
Decide then what it is to be that Greece is she does not rule the rule per the prophecy, same is of no consequence, nor can it be possible for her to conquer anything other than Lesbos, or
Then shall Greece be awaked first with her army/ so that she will fulfil her holy purpose.
To conquer without fight, her holy places/ which her enemies had conquered, and all the world acknowledges.
Then shall the refuges with great delight/run to their places like flying eagles.
Then shall the greek King, the chosen of the Lord which in everything shall be perfect and in the earth/ will rule with justice/ and the earth will take great delight in her constant peace.
It is very evident from the above that she will rule the world.
I don't need to respond to the rest since your premise as per above is totally incorrect.
Lesbos is already in Greece.
Does that mean that all Greeks are now Lesbians? Sorry, I just had to.
WOW
Call me REAL DUM but I though Israel Was the center of all whats going on During the Tribulation.... Yel, I though it all was about Jesus and Israel,,
I hear the story as a complete Different out look as far as whats going to happen during the Tribulation and Its not even close to what I hear from the Greek Orhodoxy..
Sounds as if someone has desided to put there Place in Histor before and upmost more relative that the second coming of Jesus !!!!!!!!
I know what Ntinos stated, I also know it is incorrect. And since you attempted to have the last word, please feel free to do so once you read my post. I promise to indulge your complex.
Originally posted by helen670
Somewhere.......You have to have the last word ....dont you?
As Ntinos has said ....Orthodoxy is what will influence the world....not Greece Quote
You must think I place any credence in anything between the pages of Gen. 1:1 to Rev.22:21.
(Matt. 24, 14)
For everyone one of your interpretations, there are at least two who do not agree. Your point is then that he was really blessed?
Orthodox Fathers, not least among them Blessed John (Maximovich), have interpreted the above verse in the following way: before the end of the world, Orthodoxy has to be preached to all the peoples of the Earth.
I would pefer people think for themselves rather than be led by leashes. You do nothing but quote either biblical text or the thoughts of others. Did God make you without a mind of your own?
For when this happens.......It will also be the end of the world.....The rise of the Antichrist to deceive the whole world!
That would be three prophets. Elias is not Elijah, and that is but one reason why you should understand that were there really a son of God, he would not make such an error, nor would the scribes whom it is said wrote the accounts of Jesus, by divine intervention. And any layman who prints the above reveals that they too have not educated themselves in the OT scriptures.
Also will the two prophets ''Elijah(Elias) and Enoch''