Airport Runways That Go Underground, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 23-5-2005 @ 06:52 PM by SkiFreak
Originally posted by Netchicken
Awesome post skifreak.
Here is a link to some pctures from the base, but nothing I can read fabout the tunnels.
www.billybils.de...



Thanks, Netchicken...

Nice link about Nellingen & Ecterdingen.

Nellingen also had a small airfield. At the time (1988-89), my unit shared hanger space (D Co. 4-159th Avn. -scout company of the unit) with a Blackhawk 'dustoff' Medic unit when the unit I was assigned to flew OH-58A's &C's at Nellingen- until the 58A's & 58C's were replaced with the OH-58D model AHIP scout aircraft and the unit moved into a new hanger with the rest of the unit at SAAF (Ecterdingen). The 4-159th Avn. deployed from Germany to Desert Storm after I returned to the States in late 1990 (I ended up assigned to 4/3rd ACR in Ft. Bliss- already deployed there...).
Also at Nellingen was our maintaince parts support & repair support facility- but separate unit. So I had 'business' at Nellingen as well...
Anyway...at the time, there were only main 2 units assigned to SAAF. The 4-159th Avn. & an Military Intel unit (2nd. M. I.). There was also a small 'VIP' flight detatchment there as well, that flew C-12's, U-21's & special Learjets with white military livery.

I have some photos somewhere in a scrapbook taken in 1988-90 of the 'Ecterdingen' airfield- I might even have a pic of the 'airshaft' in question...

As far as I know, the 2nd. MI unit was deactivated- and the 4-159th are now based at 'Simmons' at Ft. Bragg (I was assigned to 1-229th ATKHB in 1995 at Simmons, and the unit was there then)...so I think that there is only a 'VIP' flight detatchment there now- and maybe a 'dustoff' unit.

Back to the topic at hand...
It may have been one thing to fly Me109's out from an underground airstrip...but it's quite different (IMO) to fly large & high powered jet aircraft from an underground runway. An underground hanger...maybe, but probrably not a whole underground runway for the kind of aircraft suggested (SR-71...B2...F-117...B-1B...). Anyway, why use an SR, U2, Aurora(?) for gathering intel now-a-days?...when the use of advanced satelites work much better. Sure, there may be times when a flyover of 'sensitive' areas that may not be imediately accessable to prying satelites- that a UAV like the Predator may still be used...but, the days of flying manned high altitude planes like the U-2 & SR-71 are over.

Case in point...the days when I was at SAAF, the 2nd. MI unit flew several versions of OV-1's & specially outfitted C-12's & U-21's with 'side looking radar' and cameras for flying border missions along the East German border. These kind of missions were being phased out about the time I was leaving Germany...not only because of the changing political climate at the time, but also because of the increasing reliability & use of satelite imaging. I'm sure other Military Intel units with similar missions were being changed operationally as well, and flying 'photo recon' aircraft became obsolete...

T.S.


reply posted on 21-6-2005 @ 11:32 AM by ghost
Originally posted by DCFusion
Originally posted by Lysergic
I'd say just hope on the part that goes underground the pilot doesn't need to pull up or anything cause I doub't he'd like to slam into cave wall.


I would think this would be the major reason that a runway most likely will not be built to extend underground. If a situation were to ever arise that required the pilot to abort the landing, he would not be able to.

Although, I can deffinately see underground hangers...


I Agree! It would be much too dangerous to have a runway that extends underground. Something like that could get pilots killed, especially in places like Groom Lake where they test aircraft.

One real-life example of this comes to mind from the early days of the stealth program:

Lockheed test pilot William C. (Bill) Park was landing Have Blue 1001 at Groom Lake, after a test flight on May 4, 1978. Because of a slight miscalculation, the aircraft came in too fast. The aircraft hit the ground hard on the right side, jamming the main landing gear in a semi-retracted position. Unable to land without the gear down, he had to make an emergence takeoff to prevent the aircraft from tumbling once the speed fell below 340 kts. when the wings no longer prodused enough lift to hold the plane up.

If the Runway had underground, Park would have been killed! The aircraft was still lost, but the fact that he could take off again, allowed him to get away from the ground so he could eject from the plane safely.


reply posted on 26-6-2005 @ 01:55 AM by NWguy83
First picture

Taiwan's secret Jiashan AB, that looks like it might go into that mountain.

[edit on 26-6-2005 by NWguy83]
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



\'Inside Pine Gap: The Spy Who Came in From The Desert\' Book
  Posted 4 days ago with 5 member flags
Interesting Places- Interesting Bases-
  Posted 1 days ago with 5 member flags
Old Forgotten Bunker?
  Posted 18 days ago with 4 member flags
USAF/SRI/SETI collaboration
  Posted 19 days ago with 2 member flags
Lockheed out at the TTR?
  Posted 2 days ago with 2 member flags
YF-16 tested at a "secret base near Nellis"
  Posted 1 days ago with 2 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

RONY 2012
  US Political Madness: 11 hours ago, 66 replies
We are (nearly) all Believers!!!
  Aliens and UFOs: 17 hours ago, 40 replies
OMG: 2012 KP24 Incoming! Are we Doomed?
  2012: 12 hours ago, 35 replies