It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by truthseeka
I've thought about this for a while, but my interest recently peaked, now that I have taken an intro archaeology class. The textbooks I have focused a lot on the ancient Greco-Roman cultures, but ancient cultures of the Near East were also covered. The very fact that Egypt was included was good, but also a bit confusing. Nevertheless, my problem isn't with this class; it's with the trend, in both the media and academia, to separate ancient Egypt from the rest of ancient Africa.
Sadly, the biggest reason for this I can see is racism. Now, I am not saying that Egypt was a black African civilization only; anyone who does say this is a fool. Based on the geography of Egypt, the people undoubtedly came from various reasons. But, I also think it is equally foolish to assume that there were no black African Egyptians.
I base my opinion on what I have learned on the subject and on artifacts and artwork I have seen from Egypt. It's funny to me that it is accepted that the Greeks and Romans were a group of different people from the same region, but this view is overlooked and scarcely mentioned when it comes to the Egyptians.
Originally posted by Byrd
Okay (putting on the grad student anthropologist hat, here) -- the reason Egypt was included was two-fold... its influence was great on the Middle East (and it was a province of Rome) -- BUT -- more importantly is the impact of Napoleon and Romanticism and the Age of Reason on making it such a prominent and popular culture.
Egypt was sort of a backwater until Napoleon got it into his head that he wanted to travel down there and go on a grand conquest and secure the monuments as the Emperor of the world. Because Napoleon was so interested, it became the fasionable thing in the drawing rooms and salons of Europe, and suddenly there was a huge demand for anything Egyptian. People started claiming to be descendants of royal Egyptians and clairvoyants would "channel" ancient Egyptian lives for people. This also started the fad for Secret Societies.
In any case, all this interest led to treasure hunters running down to Egypt and collecting collectabes for the wealthy -- which, as you may know from class, was the start of museums and modern archaeology and modern anthropology.
So, it was a Mediterranean country (which often translates to Middle East in many folks' minds), its culture was derived from and was a source of culture in the whole Middle East, it was an important trade center in the area, and there's a wealth of material on it. Because it was a Roman colony, you have a wealth of Roman (and Greek) material there, including important burials, coffins, libraries, and so forth.
Indeed, Alexandria was said to be more Greek than Egyptian.
So that's why... it's not "location, location, location" -- it's "location, culture, culture."
Nothing racist about it.
Originally posted by truthseeka
I've thought about this for a while, but my interest recently peaked, now that I have taken an intro archaeology class. The textbooks I have focused a lot on the ancient Greco-Roman cultures, but ancient cultures of the Near East were also covered. The very fact that Egypt was included was good, but also a bit confusing. Nevertheless, my problem isn't with this class; it's with the trend, in both the media and academia, to separate ancient Egypt from the rest of ancient Africa.
Sadly, the biggest reason for this I can see is racism.
Now, I am not saying that Egypt was a black African civilization only
It's funny to me that it is accepted that the Greeks and Romans were a group of different people from the same region, but this view is overlooked and scarcely mentioned when it comes to the Egyptians.
I see it as nothing more but a means of taking away an African contribution to the world.
Until the 60's, the archaeologists were claiming Egypt as a European civilization, and that is obviously false.
Bantu
My bad, but that's the most ridiculous thing I've read here in a while
have to remind y'all that the early archaeologists were caught painting the faces of artwork white,
simulacra
we all know that the historical African Queen Cleopatra is undoubtly caucasian, I mean who can contest that
marg6043
Willian Leo Hansberry, father of Afrikan studies
History is an amazing subject and worthy of learning, and is never to late to know everything or at least most of everything
off the street
If you can think of a Black African culture which left its mark on the Classical world
agentgirl
I guess the BIGGEST question here is WHAT IS CAUCASIAN and WHAT IS BLACK AFRICAN?
Is this what you mean?
james the lesser
IT ISN'T AFRICA IT IS MIDDLE EAST! They are Arab, not black. They are not black/African, but arab!
There are 5 main races.
Black Arab Hispanic White Asian Indian
Egyptians are Arab, they are not black
trustnone
Actually most of science and art came from Italy to spain, also why spainish are roman catholic
Agent girl read a real history book.
Also, they must look up the history of the Moors, those Muslim Afrikans who conquered much of Europe
trustnone
if these contibutions to egypt are african in origin why are there no such structures elsewhere in africa?
OK, Street, this is what I have so far...
Nok
Kush (Nubians)
Bantu
Originally posted by marg6043
William leo was an American, historian, Nygdan
Originally posted by Nygdan
Yes, I figure. i just don't like the spelling 'Afrikan'. Its silly. is a language spoken in south africa, by the Boers, a group of dutch/flemist/french colonizers. They are also called 'Afrikaners' and such.
Boers can be recognized by their corduroy pants and jacket and slouch hats. Often accompanied by a bible, rifle, pipe, or all three.
Originally posted by Nygdan
Originally posted by marg6043
William leo was an American, historian, Nygdan
Yes, I figure. i just don't like the spelling 'Afrikan'. Its silly. Afrikaans is a language spoken in south africa, by the Boers, a group of dutch/flemist/french colonizers. They are also called 'Afrikaners' and such.
Boers can be recognized by their corduroy pants and jacket and slouch hats. Often accompanied by a bible, rifle, pipe, or all three.
external image
Originally posted by Artificium
Originally posted by Nygdan
Originally posted by marg6043
William leo was an American, historian, Nygdan
Yes, I figure. i just don't like the spelling 'Afrikan'. Its silly. Afrikaans is a language spoken in south africa, by the Boers, a group of dutch/flemist/french colonizers. They are also called 'Afrikaners' and such.
Boers can be recognized by their corduroy pants and jacket and slouch hats. Often accompanied by a bible, rifle, pipe, or all three.
external image
I am an Afrikaaner and proud of it!
Yet, I do not have any of the clothing you are talking about.
Whilst your history is vaguely correct, and I must stress VAGUELY, I am astonished at the generalisations you have painted us with and given the impression that we Afrikaaners are all a bunch of bible bashing gun wielding right wing extremists.
Now there is something they won't teach you in the history books!