It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

South Korea Vs Japan

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 30 2005 @ 12:12 AM
link   
who would win this war im wondering

both american trianed
both have good economies
and koreans hate japanese
this Scenario involes no north korean threat.

south korean army 700,000 +5miliion milita
japan 100 000 army navy and airforce

Japan's huge government debt, which totals more than 150% of GDP

i personally think south korea will win




posted on Apr, 30 2005 @ 01:11 AM
link   
Nah.. the Japanese have a lot of spunk..
This war will mainly be fought at sea and in the air..
Japan's strong in both..



posted on Apr, 30 2005 @ 01:23 AM
link   
Maybe I should start posting a bunch of threads like these..
Who would win between

Ecuador and Panama?
How bout North versus South Carolina?
What if L.A. went to war with NYC who would win that?

Buncha pointless threads.



posted on Apr, 30 2005 @ 02:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by Skibum
Maybe I should start posting a bunch of threads like these..
Who would win between

Ecuador and Panama?
How bout North versus South Carolina?
What if L.A. went to war with NYC who would win that?

Buncha pointless threads.


yeah post them sounds interesting



posted on Apr, 30 2005 @ 03:16 AM
link   
Mods this threads supports my call for a mud pitt discussion on weaponary this thread dosnt belong on
ATS.

[edit on 30-4-2005 by xpert11]



posted on Apr, 30 2005 @ 04:53 AM
link   
Agreed xpert and Skibum.



posted on Apr, 30 2005 @ 06:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by xpert11
Mods this threads supports my call for a mud pitt discussion on weaponary this thread dosnt belong on
ATS.

[edit on 30-4-2005 by xpert11]


Actually since I doubt there are any koreans or japanese on ATS who post at the weps forum, this thread may actually have a very fruitful discussion which investigates the strike capabilities of both countries..
Mudslinging happens when there are nationalist sentiments involved..



posted on Apr, 30 2005 @ 07:21 AM
link   


Actually since I doubt there are any koreans or japanese on ATS who post at the weps forum, this thread may actually have a very fruitful discussion which investigates the strike capabilities of both countries..


Pointless given that those two countries wont be at war anytime soon.



Mudslinging happens when there are nationalist sentiments involved..


Given that Korea was once occupied by Japan I doubt it would take very long for nationalist sentiments to surface. Mods please trash this thread.



posted on Apr, 30 2005 @ 10:04 AM
link   


ALL POSTERS READ THIS!

Please could members refrain from starting threads that are based around:


what is your favourite gun

who would win if the ??? and ??? went to war with each other

who has the best army/navy/airforce/secret service........
etc etc ...




www.abovetopsecret.com...

[edit on 30/4/05 by Skibum]



posted on Apr, 30 2005 @ 06:18 PM
link   
I agree totally pointless and should be closed. If you want to know the capabilities of each nation then use Goggle, unless you just want to earn some pints.



posted on May, 1 2005 @ 02:03 AM
link   
Looks like they ain't done it yet..thread's still living
And even though the Japanese don't like the koreans and vice versa.. that is irrelevant over here as there won't be any of them posting on this thread..
Thats my point..No mudslinging here beacuse nobody's blinded by nationalist sentiments.. everybody unbiased and neutral..

Its a weaponry forum.. we discuss weaponry..
What is the object of weaponry??
To defeat contesting/countering weaponry..
Where will such a test of mettle take place?
In wars and similar events..
What better way to discuss the capabilities of weapons than in war scenarios..
I don't know how the mods intended it, but IMHO those rules stated above are in place to prevent mudslinging/racist remarks etc. etc. only...
And that only happens if there are posters with nationalists sentiments involved..
I personally find it very bland to just state the specs of a weapon without investigating the scenarios/situations it can be used in..

Take dirty bombs for example..
They're despicable..They probably hurt everyone's sentiments here.. but that doesn't stop us from discussing what goes into building one..
Or the strategic ingenuity of deploying one..

Another example is Malaysia vs. Singapore..
A very very interesting scenario.. I'd love to start a thread on it..
But unfortunately with posts like those above I'm disuaded..


I;d like to hear what the mods have to say about my "interpretation" of the scope of this forum and their prescribed rules/regulations..


[edit on 1-5-2005 by Daedalus3]




top topics



 
0

log in

join