It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OXmanK
I know they are biased...and that is ok. Let 'em be that way. I just wish they would drop the word News from their channel. Also CNN and some others should as well. You have to get up very early in the morning to see actual news.
And do not ever think that there is not a balance of sorts for media outlets. The "it's Fox and Rush against the entire left wing" thought process is absurd. Since Fox's success, many of the other "news" channels have become increasingly conservative. The Right Wing owns the radio air waves. Who does the left have on the radio? Stuart Smalley, Jeanine Garafalo (comedic hack), Jerry Springer...the right owns the radio. And in print there are a number of conservative papers. Not to mention blogs and magazines and other things. The right tries to look like a victim in this when they have a comparable share in the media.
Originally posted by Carseller4
Fox is #1 for a reason. People got tired of the left wing bias on the networks and CNN.
Originally posted by BasementAddix
I like fox but cant stand Geraldo...the guys a showboat and a bad journalist...do anything for an extra 15 minutes on air...
Originally posted by dgtempe
I've yet to see or hear a "liberal" news source want to destroy the world.
I listen to both.
Originally posted by James the Lesser
Fox is like the time in a news program where they have the skiing squirrel or a dog "talking". It isn't news, just funny. But while local news may have it for a few seconds, Fox has it 24/7. I like water skiing squirrels, but not 24/7.
Also, people like hearing how we should nuke the planet, and that god will rapture them after we nuke those damn frenchies, or even worse the French Canadians, they are only a few miles away, plotting to take over and spread freedom and happiness and not kill everything that won't give Bush a bj.
Now, if I were president, here’s what I would do. Next time some country does something we don’t take a pining too, such as supporting terrorism or speaking French, I’d pick the dumbest reason for an attack, e.g., "A ‘q’ should always be followed by a ‘u’. I don’t make the rules, Iraq, but I will enforce them." The more irrational you look, the more scared the country will be that you will really hit them hard. I’d then give the country the old one-week notice until bombing starts. Then, after just twenty-four hours, I’d start bombing. When the stupid dictator calls to complain, I’d say, "I meant one week max. Oh, and by the way, ground troops - one week." I’m sure that would be enough to capitulate the average evildoer, but some extra measures could help intimidate others as well. Like, instead of just saturation bombing a city, super-saturation bomb it. After annihilating everything until nothing but ash is left, I’d nuke the ashes. It’s that extra bit of extremely disproportionate use of force that makes other countries start to wonder if America "has it all together" and really worrying who we’ll lash out against next.
Originally posted by dgtempe
I've yet to see or hear a "liberal" news source want to destroy the world.
I listen to both.