Very dodgy 5g companies that do not exist.

This is very interesting as the companies that are putting in the 5g towers in the UK are operating with company names that do not exist. And are issuing their own safety documents. The problem is that the planning inspectors in the councils have not got a clue what the real microwave emissions are. So if the emissions are bad for health trying to sue some company which does not exist is problematic. This could also be a problem as the radiation levels would if off the scale and cause physical damage since they came out during the lockdown during the vaccine rollout and could have a hand in the rapid rise of debilitating diseases and thus be cause for deniability. Why would these companies installing these towers be duplicitous?
There is some dodgy stuff going on these days since these are Chinese companies installing these 5 G towers, literally everywhere as a potential enemy in these times of geo-political tension, since they are going up everywhere if you wanted to debilitate an enemy would it be a slow unnoticeable decline. Since the towers have the same tech in them as EV 's the batteries can catch fire, and they can also run for a while if the grid goes down.

a reply to: annonentity

Colchester Council Watch are asking the relevant questions.



These are undoubtedly Dangerous Subversives.

a reply to: annonentity

I think I'd be more worried about the back doors China is known to insert in the devices they manufacture for other countries-like the ones used in the US power grid.
Turning off the lights would be devestating enough but taking down the internet to boot would create insurmountable problems.

a reply to: annonentity

The problem is you fail to comprehend 5G is a communication medium just like its predecessors.

That employs the use of non-ionizing radiation which does not have enough energy to ionize atoms or molecules.

Meaning it doesn't have sufficient power to remove electrons from atoms or molecules and thus is rather unlikely to cause damage to you or your cells.

The doom porn must flow all the same.

a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

Are you sure.

So if the emissions are bad for health trying to sue some company which does not exist is problematic. This could also be a problem as the radiation levels would if off the scale and cause physical damage since they came out during the lockdown during the vaccine rollout and could have a hand in the rapid rise of debilitating diseases and thus be cause for deniability.

Seems pretty relevant that 5G is a communication medium that employs the use of non-ionizing radiation which does not have enough energy to ionize atoms or molecules.

Considering the claims made by the op regarding emissions and that "the radiation levels would if off the scale and cause physical damage".

As to the usual rubbish, like annonentity constantly posting unsubstantiated doom porn that never comes to pass perchance?

a reply to: annonentity

Swindon Borough Council seem to be dumb on the matter. www.whatdotheyknow.com...

a reply to: annonentity

Lots of companies spawn off sub companies to reduce their legal risk ask anyone who has worked for one of the big house building companies and got dicked when that company went under......

Given the general UK layout there's quite often barely a 100 yards before you hit an obstruction unlike somewhere in Ohio you could drive a 1000 miles before hitting anything more dangerous than a potato plant that's grown a bit too high 🤣

a reply to: annonentity

How to find telecoms planning applications. www.youtube.com...

a reply to: annonentity

Three thousand member facebook group objecting to 5G mast applications.

Please post UK 5G mast applications ONLY - other posts will be removed! Please also OBJECT to mast applications here - let's all work together and help each other

Make sure you post ALL the planning application details incl:
Application reference number
Deadline for Public Comments
Link to Application details
Email to contact Planning
Email to contact local (Ward) Councillors
Any useful local info eg. close to school, playground, retirement home, hospital, sports field, etc.

www.facebook.com...

There's also a significant lack of research regarding the 60GHz frequency, and the fact that it is absorbed by oxygen molecules.

a reply to: annonentity

This video has gone up since you started this thread!

Watch at 4:58

originally posted by: IndieA

There's also a significant lack of research regarding the 60GHz frequency, and the fact that it is absorbed by oxygen molecules.

LOL, someone puts a bogus sticker on a pole and you post it.



The fact that 60GHz is absorbed by oxygen molecules, means that air blocks the signal.

LOL.

a reply to: chr0naut

LOL, someone puts a bogus sticker on a pole and you post it.

Can you provide any supporting evidence that that is a bogus sticker?

The fact that 60GHz is absorbed by oxygen molecules, means that air blocks the signal.

That's one thing it means. It also means that life supporting oxygen molecules can be excited by the 60GHz frequency, which I've heard can make the oxygen harder for living things to absorb.

Seems pretty relevant that 5G is a communication medium that employs the use of non-ionizing radiation which does not have enough energy to ionize atoms or molecules.

Microwave ovens use non-ionizing radiation as well, yet they have enough energy to cook food relatively quickly.

It's also not safe for utility workers to climb energized cellphone towers, because they also put out enough energy to cause physical harm.

a reply to: chr0naut

This article can be read in full, without providing an email, by using a private window in your internet browser.

We Have No Reason to Believe 5G Is Safe

The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently announced through a press release that the commission will soon reaffirm the radio frequency radiation (RFR) exposure limits that the FCC adopted in the late 1990s. These limits are based upon a behavioral change in rats exposed to microwave radiation and were designed to protect us from short-term heating risks due to RFR exposure.

Yet, since the FCC adopted these limits based largely on research from the 1980s, the preponderance of peer-reviewed research, more than 500 studies, have found harmful biologic or health effects from exposure to RFR at intensities too low to cause significant heating.

Citing this large body of research, more than 240 scientists who have published peer-reviewed research on the biologic and health effects of nonionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF) signed the International EMF Scientist Appeal, which calls for stronger exposure limits. The appeal makes the following assertions:

“Numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plant and animal life.

The latest cellular technology, 5G, will employ millimeter waves for the first time in addition to microwaves that have been in use for older cellular technologies, 2G through 4G. Given limited reach, 5G will require cell antennas every 100 to 200 meters, exposing many people to millimeter wave radiation. 5G also employs new technologies (e.g., active antennas capable of beam-forming; phased arrays; massive multiple inputs and outputs, known as massive MIMO) which pose unique challenges for measuring exposures.

Millimeter waves are mostly absorbed within a few millimeters of human skin and in the surface layers of the cornea. Short-term exposure can have adverse physiological effects in the peripheral nervous system, the immune system and the cardiovascular system. The research suggests that long-term exposure may pose health risks to the skin (e.g., melanoma), the eyes (e.g., ocular melanoma) and the testes (e.g., sterility).

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: annonentity

The problem is you fail to comprehend 5G is a communication medium just like its predecessors.

That employs the use of non-ionizing radiation which does not have enough energy to ionize atoms or molecules.

Meaning it doesn't have sufficient power to remove electrons from atoms or molecules and thus is rather unlikely to cause damage to you or your cells.

The doom porn must flow all the same.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...
PAY ATTENTION

a reply to: andy06shake
I guess everyone's opinion is reality for them nowadays.

a reply to: chr0naut
How much oxygen is in the air we breathe? Derrrr

a reply to: Cracka

Like every drug a cell phone gets very addictive, and the use is no longer moderate. I think there is a case that rushing toward a convenient future can't be without risk. Putting cell phone towers in school playgrounds has to be asking for trouble. Long-term damage just isn't known and under the present business models, they will do it anyway, and ignore the health effects as "Rare" Again we have a case for deniability like the vaccine, and what amounts to a large experiment on masses of people.

originally posted by: chr0naut
The fact that 60GHz is absorbed by oxygen molecules, means that air blocks the signal.

It's a "fact" that oxygen blocks their signal? So, you're saying they're surrounded by oxygen and therefore can't work at transmitting signals, preventing them from doing what they're supposed to do? Then why put these towers up if they won't work?

Do you ever listen to yourself when you speak?