King Charles 111 Diagnosed with Cancer

If they discovered it during the prostate procedure, it's probably bladder cancer. The bladder sits above the prostate and they may have noticed a lesion in that area. Surgery is usually the first option depending on whether it has metastasized.
If it has metastasized, then chemo and radiation. They'll probably do a PET scan to see if it spread.

Hope he recovers. He's a good King and a good person overall.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

All the best to the old fellow.

Hopefully, it's operable/treatable.

a reply to: wearesoscrewed

Start your own thread then?

a reply to: Phantom42338

He has probably got Turbo cancer just like Kate. We are seeing an unprecedented death rate in celebrities, They didn't pull the Astra Zenaka shot because it was safe and effective. I would have thought giving an experimental jab to heads of state was a "No NO' but maybe a few got it. Either way, I wish them all the best as they are all part of our lives whether we want them to be or not.

a reply to: Phantom42338

Apparently he's working from home.

I can imagine his video meetings: "Your Majesty, you're on mute!".

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
BBC News - King Charles III diagnosed with cancer, Buckingham Palace says
www.bbc.co.uk...

Link includes statement from the Palace.

Diagnosed after routine treatment for an enlarged prostate. It's not known what type but it's not prostate.

I wish his Majesty all the best, but I m betting some on here may not, sadly.

Yes, I wish him all the best too but I think the monarchy should be abolished after him.

a reply to: annonentity

Matter of time before the vaccine crowd turned up?




I thought the royals were your "elites" who were bent on killing us all.

So why would they take your "poison".

Kate has "turbo cancer"?

You know this, how?

If our King had your fictional turbo cancer, would he being treated as an outpatient?

a reply to: annonentity

You will use any situation to punt your doom porn and anti-vax nonsense, won't you.

Hang your head in shame.

Kind of blows the kind of crap you choose to believe where the likes of Adrenochrome is concerned out the window through.

Else the poor sod would not be in this situation i suppose.

Speedy recovery to the fellow, i don't hold with what he represents in this day of age, but nonetheless wish him all the best.

a reply to: quintessentone

Maybe after Wills? Harry, Andrew, Edward and or Beatrice, absolutely not. That would be the end.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: quintessentone

Maybe after Wills? Harry, Andrew, Edward and or Beatrice, absolutely not. That would be the end.

Maybe after Charles? What's with holding on to this nonsense?

originally posted by: wearesoscrewed

Wow that would be cool too . He has to get them removed and then he would be Queen Charles right?

The next proper thing would be to execute the master plan, and finally crown King Camilla !!

( Anyone else notice that that kinda sounds, and looks like Godzilla ? Weird, eh ? )

Wishing all of the best to Her Very Super-Duper Royal Highness : Queen Charlotte-of-Sausage-on-Thames,
and King-Kong Godzilla-of-Windsor-We-Smile-and-Wave-Because-You-Paid-For-All-of-This-Ridiculous-Oppulencechestershire.

Doing their part for Equality, Diversity, and Whatever agenda or narrative is in opps !

All for one !!
What was that other part ?

Maybe Uncle Jimmy and Uncle Eppy can finally come-out of the program, and get-back to what they all love, eh ?

They stand before us, naked emperors.
Some see, some don't.

I invite all to look.

originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: Phantom42338

He has probably got Turbo cancer just like Kate. We are seeing an unprecedented death rate in celebrities, They didn't pull the Astra Zenaka shot because it was safe and effective. I would have thought giving an experimental jab to heads of state was a "No NO' but maybe a few got it. Either way, I wish them all the best as they are all part of our lives whether we want them to be or not.

I'm a cancer researcher. Never heard of "turbo cancer". Does Kate have cancer too? Haven't read that.

a reply to: KnowItAllKnowNothin

"Doing their part for Equality, Diversity, and Whatever agenda or narrative is in opps !"

Guess you missed my link to his Prince's Trust which does precisely that?

"King Camilla"?

Thanks for your sage contributions to the thread.

a reply to: Phantom42338

There's no such thing, and no, she does not seem to have cancer
.

Only in some folk's imagination

a reply to: quintessentone

Because replacing the constitutional monarchy with something else could be problematic never mind most likely costly for some reason or another, because well when is change anything else these days.

We did Brexit and look how that turned out thus far.

I agree that it is probably time for change in the UK, past time even, but what we would replace it with remains to be seen or proposed.

a reply to: quintessentone

Better than a Trump or a Biden type hegemony? Perhaps?

a reply to: andy06shake

A sized down monarchy?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: quintessentone

Better than a Trump or a Biden type hegemony? Perhaps?

You would pick the worst example. lol

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: quintessentone

Better than a Trump or a Biden type hegemony? Perhaps?

Really?
Using Charles' cancer as a springboard to bash US candidates?
Shame.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Yeah try taking away the majority of the aristocrat's land and titles and we are apt to end up with a war between Parliament and the House of Lords methinks.

Might be fun to watch for a while but it's apt to end in tears.

Cost the general public an arm and a leg and most likely end up with us ultimately having to bail out the monarchy as well as the bankers all over again.

I've not got any answer ether all the same.

It's like pulling threads or Jenga i suppose.