Words are worth 13x more than sexual abuse

a reply to: JinMI

Should Trump sue?

He Should Johnny Depp her ass

Amber Heard Sued Johnny for assault/abuse and wins millions of dollars from him and Defaming him in the process.

Johnny Depp knowing that he is innocent and that she can prove nothing then sues her right back for all of the money he had to pay her.

Trump could easily do the same.

a reply to: charlest2

2 juries didn’t believe she fabricated the story.

a reply to: asabuvsobelow

He could "try."


In NYC, I don't think the just and lawful result would be the outcome.

originally posted by: IgorMartinez
a reply to: charlest2

2 juries didn’t believe she fabricated the story.

No?

Then why wasn't he liable for rape?


Regardless, this isn't about the jury. I asked you, Igor, if you could point me to one piece of evidence that best proves that the 80 some million is just, to show it.

originally posted by: IgorMartinez
a reply to: charlest2

2 juries didn’t believe she fabricated the story.

Apparently they did or Trump would be in jail . Do you realize the penalty of rape/Sexual Assault ?

originally posted by: asabuvsobelow
a reply to: JinMI

Should Trump sue?

He Should Johnny Depp her ass

Amber Heard Sued Johnny for assault/abuse and wins millions of dollars from him and Defaming him in the process.

Johnny Depp knowing that he is innocent and that she can prove nothing then sues her right back for all of the money he had to pay her.

Trump could easily do the same.

Where's Rick Hoffman when you need him?

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: asabuvsobelow

He could "try."


In NYC, I don't think the just and lawful result would be the outcome.

In the End mate the DOJ and all of these Judges could give a damn about the Truth , they are just trying to Break Trump Financially so he will back down.

a reply to: asabuvsobelow

Well yea, I think that's a foregone conclusion.


Yet what does this reduce the justice system to?


That is my entire point.

a reply to: JinMI

I respect the plaintiff’s testimony and jury decision. You have no fact to prove they are wrong.

Like I said, those reports include non liquid assets, like property and business value.

Looks like he will have to sell property to pay his legal bills IMO.

a reply to: IgorMartinez

I respect the plaintiff’s testimony and jury decision. You have no fact to prove they are wrong.

In other words, you don't have anything that backs up your opinion. Yet your opinions are so very strong! The definition of an NPC.

Also, we don't prove innocence.......

Thank you for your participation, here's a trophy

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: asabuvsobelow

Well yea, I think that's a foregone conclusion.


Yet what does this reduce the justice system to?


That is my entire point.

Reduced to something very very very bad .

The DOJ has massive power , They can take all of your money , possessions and Lock you away for life and or even kill you . The DOJ has the most power of any branch/department save perhaps the DOD.

Combine a corrupt DOJ with rigged elections and what do we have . A Banana Republic as it's been said many times.

a reply to: IgorMartinez

2 hand-picked juries where exactly? And a hand-picked judge to boot. New York City? The nation's bastion of law and order, and democracy, right up there with Washington DC?
(SARC)

a reply to: asabuvsobelow

Yes, I agree with you about the DoJ.

The last bastion of security from them lies within the judiciary.

Should that be as compromised as is being demonstrated, we are in freefall Constitutionally speaking.

a reply to: IgorMartinez

I respect the plaintiff’s testimony and jury decision. You have no fact to prove they are wrong.

Of course you do , you're such a good little Lamb . Don't think just let us handle the thinking I wouldn't want you to break sweat or grab your stress blanket.

originally posted by: charlest2
a reply to: IgorMartinez

2 hand-picked juries where exactly? And a hand-picked judge to boot. New York City? The nation's bastion of law and order, and democracy, right up there with Washington DC?
(SARC)

I just want someone, anyone to point to one piece of compelling testimony from Carroll that justifies this 80million price tag.

Just one.

Even without the funding, politics, character flaws and lack of tangible evidence that lies beyond testimony.

Just a few quotes that convinced them.

a reply to: JinMI

She is an unsuccessful, failed writer and author looking for gold. And a sexual deviant to boot.

Stormy Daniels is proud of this woman. Caroll succeeded where she failed.


This Republic is so f*c*ed. There is no hope for salvage.

a reply to: charlest2

Ok now you’re discriminating against all New Yorkers.

a reply to: Boomer1947

1. There was no evidence it happened
2. If he says it did not happen, but someone else says it does, how is that worth 80 million dollars?

There was no proof of harm. They had one witness who said she thinks she said something about threats. She deleted emails and texts...

There is no reason for this except to try to humiliate and bankrupt a political opponent.

a reply to: asabuvsobelow

Well I don’t get stressed about Trump losing like so many here seem to.

originally posted by: IgorMartinez
a reply to: asabuvsobelow

Well I don’t get stressed about Trump losing like so many here seem to.

It would appear you are only concerned with things that you are told to be concerned with.

I mean, that's what's been demonstrated here and with our past exchanges.


You can prove me wrong by telling me what piece of testimony convinced you that this 80 mil price tag is justice.