What is Dan's relationship to National Security Agency (NSA) Project Preserve Destiny (PPD)?
Dan allegedly worked on Project Aquarius and Project Lotus or STAAR, which are allegedly "bean boxes" or compartmentalized projects within PPD.
What exactially did you find out about thoes topics? Anything that we haven't heard here before?
Very possibly nothing you haven't heard before. Sorry to cop out (I'm a little tired) but there is a wealth of information and data at
Is there anything that we, the members of ATS can do to help Dan and Toni? Or for that matter, yourself and others involved in this case?
Good question. Continued research on all sides of the issue would be of great help. As far as publicity, I wouldn't go there until at the very least,
a court recognises and accepts the documents presented. It may have a ways to go after that no doubt.... Until then, we have, as usual... pure
That leads me in to some bad but not surprising news.
I'll paste in the happenings reported from court today by Don himself. After that is an anonymous post I would sincerely suggest is from Marcia
McDowell, and then one from one of the unknown "players" who seems to steer events every now and then. Following that is a post from "a raven".
These "ravens" have proven themselves to be in the know with Dr Burisch and his surroundings / activities. I don't know if it's one person or
many, as the posts are always anonymous. The final paste is a reply from Don to these anon posters.
Quite the mind #$@% indeed!!!
Joined: Oct 19, 2004
Location: Alberta, Canada
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2005 3:04 am Post subject: Body-blow
Friends, I have some very bad news. The Court DID NOT EVEN LOOK AT IT. The judge had his mind made up. HE DID NOT EVEN CARE. He obviously wanted to
rubber-stamp what the counsel for the Respondent (this would be the 'prosecutor', who in this case is the Minister of Citizenship & Immigration)
said in his response. Basically, because the Respondent did not respond to my Application for Judicial Leave last year (and this is what he said in
response to my question as to why Leave was granted in the first place), this was only an opportunity to assert that there was no error in the
original ruling by the IRB. That is to say, the judge agreed with the findings of that tribunal, which was: there is no public record of Majestic 12,
no precedent, and so it cannot exist. There is no grounds for plausibility, therefore any affidavits concerning these things are rendered moot and
inadmissable. In effect, I was told: "Yes, you seem sincere in your belief, but it isn't possible, so it doesn't matter how many affidavits you
The Court DID NOT EVEN LOOK AT THE DOCUMENT. I had prepared 5 copies, with clear cover and nicely bound, in the required format. I had all the
applicable Rules of the Federal Court Rules and the Immigration & Refugee Act, complete with section and subsection, but when the judge on duty for
that week is a small-minded strict-constructionist (euphemism for 'hanging judge') who is bent on not accepting any additional evidence, despite its
historic import, one can only go past them.....TO THE SUPREME COURT.
Incidentally, even if Dan himself were there, with J-Rod in tow, this particular judge wouldn't have admitted any testimony from him, and would've
probably told him to 'get that freak out of my courtroom'. Had the judge who ordered this proceeding actually presided, I'm certain that at the
very least he would have actually LOOKED at the document. Just to make clear to the reader; there is no longer an APPEALS court for immigration cases,
due to the abuse of the system in the past. However, once judicial leave is granted, it allows additional evidence to be presented that wasn't
available at the time of the original hearing. It is also an opportunity to show any error in the reasoning used in the original ruling. Since that
original ruling was based on the lack of a public record, the assumption that it is too fantastical is supposedly acceptable. Here is a snip from my
TAKE NOTICE THAT the Applicants will make a motion to the Court in
writing under Rule 369 of the Federal Court Rules, 1998 (the “Rules”).
THE MOTION IS TO request leave to enter a Form 255 “Request To Admit” and its concurrent Form 256 “Response To Request To Admit” from Dr. Dan
Burisch, Phd., Majestic badge No. H-6196-Maj-E-ret., of Clark County, Las Vegas, NV, pursuant to Rule 8 (1); Rule 41(4) (b) and (c); and Rule 312 (a)
and (c) of the “Rules”.
THE GROUNDS FOR THE MOTION ARE that:
(i) Rule 8 empowers this Court to extend the time fixed by subsection 341(1) of the Rules after such time has expired;
(ii) The following sections of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act are applicable:
(iii) Sec. 150.1; (1) The regulations may provide for any matter relating to (b) the disclosure of information for the purposes of national security,
the defence of Canada or the conduct of international affairs, including the implementation of an agreement or arrangement entered into under section
5 of the Department of Citizenship and Immigration Act.
(iv) Sec. 113; (a) an applicant whose claim to refugee protection has been rejected may present only new evidence that arose after the rejection or
was not reasonably available, or that the applicant could not reasonably have been expected in the circumstances to have presented, at the time of the
rejection; of the Federal Court Rules, 1998 (“the Rules”).
(v) Sec. 182; (1) In conducting an inquiry, the judge is not bound by any legal or technical rules of evidence and may receive, and base a decision
on, evidence presented in the proceedings that the judge considers credible or trustworthy in the circumstances of the case.
Now the fight gets serious.
I just hope the judge hadn't gone duck-hunting with Dick.....
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:06 am Post subject: Reply with quote
Don and Starry,
I'm so sorry to hear the news and can't even begin to imagine the frustration you must be feeling. What a load of crap. I can't help but wonder if
the outcome was decided before you ever set foot in court.
Please know you guys have many supporters here who care about you.
I have a feeling this fight still has a long way to go.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:07 am Post subject: DONDEP READ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Reply with quote
YES TOMORROW IS A NEW DAY BUT TODAY SOMETHING IS CREEPING AWAY FROM YOU THAT YOU MIGHT NOT REALIZE!!!!!!!!!!! YOU FIND YOURSELF IN THE MIDDLE OF A WAR
BETWEEN THE MAJI AND THE ILLUMINATI AND THE PRESSURES COULD CHANGE THE MAJI'S MIND ON ALL THIS AND IF THAT HAPPENS NO MATTER WHAT THEY HAVE SAID THEY
WILL PRESSURE DAN TO SHUT HIS MOUTH!!!!!!!!!! GOD IN HEAVEN IF THAT HAPPENS EVERYTHING THAT HAS BEEN WON HERE IN THE REAL WORLD, A LEGAL PAPER, WILL
GO TO NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THE REQUEST TO ADMIT SAYS "FOR THIS HEARING ONLY"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I SUGGEST, NO I REALLY SUGGEST YOU GET A HOLD OF MCDOWELL IF STILL POSSIBLE REALLY QUICK BEFORE SHE CREEPS BACK INTO THE WOODWORK AND TAKES DAN RIGHT
IF SHE DOES AND HE DOES, THAT PIECE OF PAPER YOU HAVE IN YOUR HANDS NO MATTER WHAT THE HONESTY DAN GAVE UP THERE - IT WILL ONLY BE WORTH FOLDING PAPER
TO STOP YOUR DESK FROM WOBBLING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
IT'S ALWAYS BAD TO HAVE TO GO BACK TO THE SAME TROUGH AND ASKING MORE OF DAN AFTER HE HAS DONE WHAT HE HAS DONE WILL REALLY BE ASKING A LOT FROM A
GUY THAT IS RETIRED AFTER 20 YEARS, BUT DAMNIT IF YOU DON'T, THE ONLY THING YOU WILL HAVE IN YOUR HANDS IS A GOOD FEELING, NOTHING, NOTHING, NOTHING
YOU NEED YOU REALLY NEED A GENERAL AFFADAVIT THAT CAN BE USED IN ANY COURT ANYWHERE AND FOR ANYTIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DON'T LOSE CONTROL OF THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IF YOU CAN STILL CONTACT HER, YOU BEST GET WRITING OR SLEEP THROUGH THE HISTORY.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:18 am Post subject: Reply with quote
Yea he's (Dan) lost a lot of weight. The damage is moving through his body. He's dying. He is on special medication to slow "it" but it won't
stop "it". He only has a few years left. He knows it. That's why the video autobiography and him being willing to tell the truth.
Joined: Oct 19, 2004
Location: Alberta, Canada
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:57 am Post subject: Duly-Noted
Duly noted. I suspect that all is not as it seems; as one of us has mentioned recently, it almost seemed too Hollywoodesque to be 'real'. That's
okay, we've been down this road before and it'll get worse before it gets better. That Court was a sham, and I gather it was constructed that way
Again, it's only 10% what happens to us, it's 90% how we deal with it.
Boomer, now that you're back, don't fade away just because of this. This ain't Hollywood, yet anyway.
Thanks for the update, raven. Give him our best if you can. Tell him that the theft at the Soda Shop has been well-documented both from within and
without, and we know all about Snotface and the POLB. If they thought they would change their image in our eyes only to pull the rug out from under
us, all the while looking like the Good Guys, "they got another think comin'."
The battle continues....................