Proof Creationism Is BS

a reply to: CoyoteAngels
Now you've done it!
You went and opened that can of worms lol.

I can give you the short answer, which is strictly my opinion.
Many that deny an Intelligent Designer believe time is the intelligent designer.
To the evolutionist, time is their god, anything and all things can be done and are possible, through time.
The evolution theory is their holy scripture.
Much of it is taken on faith (belief without proof).
To these folks, evolution is a form of religion.
It's actually why we see threads like this pop up from time to time.
The OP probably had something come up that made them question their faith and had to solidify that faith by bashing someone else's.
Again, just an opinion.

We are all born Trans until we Select our Gender.

originally posted by: PolyATS
We are all born Trans until we Select our Gender.

....
Wrong thread?

I'm not catching on to what you are saying. It went over my head. ✈🤷

originally posted by: Untun
a reply to: CoyoteAngels

In my mind evolution was linked to Neanderthal, some dark Medieval times, some gaps and future dinosaurs.

a reply to: Quadrivium

And both roads lead back to the same question.... what came before the bang and who struck the match? 💥

a reply to: CoyoteAngels
We are not so sure anymore that there was a bang, as extrapolating all the way back to a singularity leads to predictions that disagree with what we currently observe.
But I get your drift.

originally posted by: Quadrivium
Many that deny an Intelligent Designer believe time is the intelligent designer.

I have to disagree because they don't ascribe intelligence to it.

While I may agree that some do seem religious about their POV, I see a big difference in how they, compared to people who hold actual religious beliefs, can drop what they believe if a good enough source of data is offered.

For example: James Webb Space Telescope Images Challenge Theories of How Universe Evolved

While not everyone might go down this path, it does show the difference between science as being something still being worked on (not religion) and those clinging to an explanation with nothing but faith supporting it (actual religion).

a reply to: Peeple

God likes nipples. The End. 😎

originally posted by: daskakik

originally posted by: Quadrivium
Many that deny an Intelligent Designer believe time is the intelligent designer.

I have to disagree because they don't ascribe intelligence to it.

While I may agree that some do seem religious about their POV, I see a big difference in how they, compared to people who hold actual religious beliefs, can drop what they believe if a good enough source of data is offered.

For example: James Webb Space Telescope Images Challenge Theories of How Universe Evolved

While not everyone might go down this path, it does show the difference between science as being something still being worked on (not religion) and those clinging to an explanation with nothing but faith supporting it (actual religion).

I think you misunderstood, but maybe not.
Let me clarify:
I was talking about "evolutionists".
These folks bash other religious folks over the head with evolution.
They go out of their way to try and prove Creation wrong.
Those that see evolution for what it is, a scientific theory, and understand how science works don't do this.
They understand that objectively, science does not and cannot disprove an Intelligent Designer.

originally posted by: Quadrivium
a reply to: CoyoteAngels
We are not so sure anymore that there was a bang, as extrapolating all the way back to a singularity leads to predictions that disagree with what we currently observe.
But I get your drift.

So what else explains why the universe is expanding,which we can demonstrate.

I have to have physics explained to me like I'm 13.

originally posted by: Quadrivium
I think you misunderstood, but maybe not.

I get your drift.

Let me clarify:
I was talking about "evolutionists".
These folks bash other religious folks over the head with evolution.
They go out of their way to try and prove Creation wrong.

Seems to me both sides like to play that game.

Those that see evolution for what it is, a scientific theory, and understand how science works don't do this.
They understand that objectively, science does not and cannot disprove an Intelligent Designer.

Here we have the crux of the matter, science may not disprove an Intelligent Designer but it might disprove your Intelligent Designer. In other words it might disprove the Intelligent Designer depicted in the bible.

They might not have a win, but they might be able to thwart your's.

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels

originally posted by: Quadrivium
a reply to: CoyoteAngels
We are not so sure anymore that there was a bang, as extrapolating all the way back to a singularity leads to predictions that disagree with what we currently observe.
But I get your drift.

So what else explains why the universe is expanding,which we can demonstrate.

I have to have physics explained to me like I'm 13.

You don't wanna know....
But you asked, so......
The BIG BOUNCE (see? I told ya, you don't wanna know).
It's kinda like a balloon expanding and contracting.
Each cycle is like the universe starting over.......Aw hell nvm, just Google "Big Bounce"

a reply to: daskakik
Best of luck to them.
If they try, it proves my point.

a reply to: Quadrivium

Oh, the oscillating universe. Ancient Hindu's knew this. A day and a night of Brahma.

Have they found enough mass to start a contraction?

Has the universe been oscillating for all of infinity? Did some force or phenomena perform the first 'blow' of the balloon?

originally posted by: Quadrivium
a reply to: daskakik
Best of luck to them.
If they try, it proves my point.

No it doesn't.

It proves you think only your version of an Intelligent Designer is valid, and it might not be.

originally posted by: daskakik

originally posted by: Quadrivium
a reply to: daskakik
Best of luck to them.
If they try, it proves my point.

No it doesn't.

It proves you think only your version of an Intelligent Designer is valid, and it might not be.

Exactly!
Faith.
Belief without evidence.

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: Quadrivium

Oh, the oscillating universe. Ancient Hindu's knew this. A day and a night of Brahma.

Have they found enough mass to start a contraction?

Has the universe been oscillating for all of infinity? Did some force or phenomena perform the first 'blow' of the balloon?

Sounds like you are on it. Let me know what you find!
You're doing great.

originally posted by: Quadrivium
Exactly!
Faith.
Belief without evidence.

There is enough evidence to put your Intelligent Designer in doubt.

That is what the thread is about. You had to shift it from the biblical god to the general Intelligent Designer to argue your point.

if you like your nipples
you can keep your nipples,

if your nipples displease you,
strike them off.

you're lucky, there are some poor bastards that don't have them.

like some babies are born with their brains on the outside of their skull. "cough cough"

god is always screwing with people, he must be a democrat. look at quasimodo.

sanctuary!

There are two creations of man described in the Bible. In genesis chapter 1 God creates man in his/their image. In Chapter two Lord God creates man "Adam" from the dust on the ground.

Why Lord God formed Adam with nipples and a navel/belly butten you have to ask Lord God. My take on it is that Lord God created a copy of the man God created in chapter 1.

In Chapter 1. God created man male and female in theri image. That might explain why we we have nipples and a belly butten. Because who every they are have them. Man is created in a image and not by some scientific reasoning that have to be explained.