So did 2000 mules actually have anything?

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: olaru12

And the whole "Q" thing has you so obsessed and bothered why again? 🐸

edit on Oct-22-2022 by xuenchen because: rama lama ding dong 🎆

:


It's weird, isn't it?

originally posted by: S2022
a reply to: ChiefD

Yeah dont think for yourself, just believe what I say

Where we dupe one, we dupe all!

originally posted by: stosh64

originally posted by: bloodymarvelous

From what I can find out about it, without actually watching it, it seems like it turned out to be kind of a nothing burger.

That's about the level of investigation I have come to expect . Good job

People wonder where the label 'Drones' & 'NPCs' come from?

The second post is the same...

Honestly, the reason that I posted the question is because if you try to google it, the first two pages of results are pretty much nothing but "2000 Mules Debunked!!!"

So I figure I might as well just ask the question of a forum where someone likely to know can answer.

originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: bloodymarvelous

If you want the abridged version, skip to 25 minutes.

www.bitchute.com...


See Also Thread:

Watch The Voter Fraud

www.abovetopsecret.com...

They purchased phone geolocation data from data brokers from October to January in some metro areas.

They then created a geofence around 309 ballot droboxes in the Metro Atlanta area, then they cross referenced people who had been to TEN or more drop boxes and 5 or more visits to one of these "Organizations".. cough cough.

This of course is starting with the worst offenders who met that criteria.

What were the results? 242 people (ballot mules) who averaged visiting 24 drop boxes and coincidently visited on average 8 of these "organizations".

This example shows a single person visiting 28 drop boxes and 5 leftist "organizations" in a single day. (Ballot stash houses).

Then they did the same thing in Phoenix Arizona, identifying about 200 ballot mules. Then Milwaukee Wisconsin and they had about 100 ballot mules who averaged visiting 28 ballot drop boxes each. Then in Michigan, over 500 ballot mules. There are some people in Detroit that visited over 100 different ballot drop boxes.

Philadelphia, over 1100 ballot mules who averaged visiting 50 ballot drop boxes each.

They then got some video of one of these drop boxes, they chose one in Gwinnett county Georgia which showed 1,962 ballots deposited in a 24 hour period Both video and geolocation data showed that only 271 people approached that drop box in that time period.

Then there is video of some of these mules dropping off ballots with gloves and taking pictures of the ballots being dropped in so that they can get paid. More video of a mules walking up to a drop box with little bag full of ballots they are putting in.

These are just the worst offenders.

Undeniable voter fraud.

I think I'm sold enough to watch.

I mostly wanted to know if the total of "mules" x boxes visited x ballots deposited per visit would be enough ballots to affect the outcome.

That amount of man power involves spending a lot of money. It also means a large number of people who could potentially talk about it. But mostly whoever did it would need to be anticipating a big enough financial return to justify the expense.

I'm not sure if I should be more frightened that it happened, or that the person/group who did it expects to make back enough money to cover it?

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: S2022
a reply to: ChiefD

Yeah dont think for yourself, just believe what I say

Where we dupe one, we dupe all!

Trust your Masters

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: S2022
a reply to: ChiefD

Yeah dont think for yourself, just believe what I say

Where we dupe one, we dupe all!

Would that apply to your numerous responses on the Covid and Vaxx threads that are increasingly being shown to be absolutely false?

Aah so youre a victim of propaganda. Pretty telling that google puts all those fake debunk articles before any website that covered it without opinion masked as news.

Also its more frightening that its not being investigated by the FBI and this will just continue but with improved, harder to prove, technique. The criminal traitors to democracy will just use the documentary as a lesson well learned and adjust to it.

originally posted by: CrazyWater

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: S2022
a reply to: ChiefD

Yeah dont think for yourself, just believe what I say

Where we dupe one, we dupe all!

Would that apply to your numerous responses on the Covid and Vaxx threads that are increasingly being shown to be absolutely false?

In regard to my COVID and vax posts, I usually only echo the official and orthodox opinions. I think you will find that, more often than not, I have been correct. Though I do accede that there have been times i have used inappropriate metaphor or allegory.

It is actually fairly funny that I am often accused of being a mindless follower, by numerous doom-porn believing 'conspirasists' who are not even original enough to phrase their counter arguments in their own vocabulary. All the sheep bleat the same.

originally posted by: bloodymarvelous

Even if each one was visiting 10 boxes, and did so 10 times, that's only about 500 or 600 ballots each. I guess it could add up, with enough "mules" doing it.

We lets say 20 mules in AZ dropped 10 times each each day for 2 weeks and did 5 per drop. That is 1000 per day, so 14,000 in two week and it took 12,000 ballots in AZ to swing the election.

originally posted by: ElitePlebeian
Aah so youre a victim of propaganda. Pretty telling that google puts all those fake debunk articles before any website that covered it without opinion masked as news.

Also its more frightening that its not being investigated by the FBI and this will just continue but with improved, harder to prove, technique. The criminal traitors to democracy will just use the documentary as a lesson well learned and adjust to it.

It could have been. True The Vote approached the GBI with claims of a witness. When the GBI and FBI said basically ok great, we will speak with the witness, True The Vote ghosted. FBI followed up with a letter to them. Still ghosted.
They seemed to think a better way was to put out a misleading documentary, still not have the witness come forward and make a few million. But yeah um ok.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: bloodymarvelous

Even if each one was visiting 10 boxes, and did so 10 times, that's only about 500 or 600 ballots each. I guess it could add up, with enough "mules" doing it.

We lets say 20 mules in AZ dropped 10 times each each day for 2 weeks and did 5 per drop. That is 1000 per day, so 14,000 in two week and it took 12,000 ballots in AZ to swing the election.

But wait, Dinesh said in the interview I posted that the ballots were likely all legal. So how did it swing anything? He states they should not be considered legal. But he never states they were fake or not registered voters who filled out the ballots.

DeSouza has no way to know where the ballots themselves came from, such as whether they were harvested . He can claim to be certain the same person who visited 10 boxes wasn't just delivering their own ballot, plus family. That would be insanely unlikely.

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: ElitePlebeian
a reply to: ChiefD



At this point you guys are so brainwashed by msm you wouldnt recognize fraud or corruption even if you were hit in the face with it. Which the documentary basically does.

AT this point you guys are so far up Qanon and Alex Jones bung and Bitchute you are totally brainwashed you don't even try to abide by ATS mantra of "deny ignorance" Your confirmation bias has you brain in lock down, unable to see anything that isn't MAGA. Pathetic. It's the real TDS...own it!!

The difference between them saying it and you saying it, is they actually give evidence and/or examples.


In this case, it is starting to appear that 2000 Mules has met, at a minimum, the burden of evidence that is met by climate change models.

I don't see random delivery drivers going to 10 drop boxes in the same shift by chance. With traffic, a person can only drive to so many locations in one day, so hitting all 10 should usually require intention.

a reply to: frogs453

Source?

a reply to: frogs453

They wore 1 glove. Not even 2. Are you wearing one?

a reply to: frogs453

Pretty sure it did.

a reply to: bloodymarvelous

What I would like tracked is those trucks that delivered thousands of ballots after offices closed, you know the one that everyone went to bed thinking trump won at 3-4am, and then those trucks arrived carrying thousands of ballots just enough to win the election.. Where is that data?

We don't need to track the "mules" 5-6 ballots. We need to track where the many, many trucks came from. Where they went and collected ballots, because 10,000+ one sided ballots don't just show up at 4am out of no where, across the country at the same time.

I want those drivers tracked, and everyone that was in 5 feet of those trucks. I think we will be surprised at the results. The 5-6 mule ballots weren't enough to win the election as Trump's lead was pretty much a done deal until the overnight delivery of Democrat only ballots.


Especially when they found thousands of trump ballots in ditches.

I think ANYONE involved in touching ballots even for a second should have their data public for 2-3 months with a blacklist on their house address only. Unless 2-3 or more non family members(ballot handlers) are located at said address at the same time.

Anyone caught handling ballots and grouping outside of designated areas (pickup and delivery points; excluding family.). Should be convicted of tampering. Especially if said rules are in place and known. Before you think this isn't doable, trial jury members aren't allowed to meet outside of the hearings.

With a max of 1 member per household allowed to be a handler. I think that would be perfect rules to prevent tampering.

Having this data will show us who was throwing away votes, where the ballots actually came from. It would also reduce tampering 100fold, with criteria encoded in the trackers. With their covid exposure app it should be a cinch.

To cut down on the "I forgot my phone" bs all handlers should have a temp sticker on their car and in their wallet that pings tower locations. Anyone who forgets their card/tracker should be automatically disqualified and photo proof of someone out of line 10,000$ fine and 5,000$ reward. Easily verifiable via city cams.

Btw, it's easy to put timers and other defining codes in this type of tracking to account for car bypass. Or even public transportation.

Also with transportation, we will use casino deck rules: No truck can be used to deliver ballots twice. Unless it is an EV with door/lock/hatch timers sent to the cloud for public viewing. So if a truck is being loaded in Walmart parking lot it can ping gps cords and time of locks. Or if is being dropped off and picking up sorted ballots for another location. It would reflect on the time range compared to other trucks. All delivery trucks should have cargo cams with facial recognition that flags any truck who has a face that doesn't match the system for that day. *If* a truck is flagged, police should be sent to the scene and all ballots of said truck taken into evidence and ballots to be sorted and gone through by handwriting recognition software. (Yes they have it). Duplicates get tossed, and the rest are returned to the delivery point via 5-6 uniforms. (Because said ballots will of been opened and tested extra security would be needed). Once video has been gone through, the pickup point should be fined 50,000$ per offences and 2nd offense up to 1million dollars in fines, 3rd offense the property gets shut down. This money gets divided into supporting poor families, and to support the program.


I don't care who you vote for, it's clear that the election system is untrusted, and extremes need to be applied.

edit on bSundayam2022-10-23T05:41:48-05:00kamSun, 23 Oct 2022 05:41:48 -0500Sun, 23 Oct 2022 05:41:48 -050020220 by BlackArrow because: (no reason given)

originally posted by: bloodymarvelous

I mostly wanted to know if the total of "mules" x boxes visited x ballots deposited per visit would be enough ballots to affect the outcome.

that's a good question. With the parameters set, they find a good bit of fraud, but have to extrapolate to come up with enough to overturn the election. But they only looked at some key spots, and there is a chance this was much larger than what was looked at here.

The end result is there is enough smoke to warrant looking for a fire. If some DERP tells you not to watch it, you know they are puss heads trying to keep you from seeing facts.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: CrazyWater

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: S2022
a reply to: ChiefD

Yeah dont think for yourself, just believe what I say

Where we dupe one, we dupe all!

Would that apply to your numerous responses on the Covid and Vaxx threads that are increasingly being shown to be absolutely false?

In regard to my COVID and vax posts, I usually only echo the official and orthodox opinions. I think you will find that, more often than not, I have been correct. Though I do accede that there have been times i have used inappropriate metaphor or allegory.

It is actually fairly funny that I am often accused of being a mindless follower, by numerous doom-porn believing 'conspirasists' who are not even original enough to phrase their counter arguments in their own vocabulary. All the sheep bleat the same.

LOL, it's funny in that you would pretend not to be a mindless drone, but admit to it at the same time.

originally posted by: ElitePlebeian
a reply to: frogs453

Source?

The link is in this thread. Maybe page 3? If you read the thread you'll find it.

originally posted by: ElitePlebeian
a reply to: frogs453

They wore 1 glove. Not even 2. Are you wearing one?

At that time to pump gas, sure did. Didn't need both hands for the pump.

One would think that Trump's team would be all over this evidence, if it had merit.