It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: network dude
that may be the case, but didn't he work very closely with Epstein's people? Perhaps I misread that part.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: network dude
Then focus on that. It only hurts your argument when you come in here trying to pass off Photoshopped images as legitimate.
originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: asabuvsobelow
So what do you suggest? The only facts we have, are the documents from the warrant. The documents from NARA and the documents from Trump himself such as the 2 separate letters regarding who he provided access to.
I mean I guess in that case there shouldn't be 10 threads with why this isn't real or arguing about whether he declassified everything. We should all just be waiting for further evidence.
originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: asabuvsobelow
So what do you suggest? The only facts we have, are the documents from the warrant. The documents from NARA and the documents from Trump himself such as the 2 separate letters regarding who he provided access to.
I mean I guess in that case there shouldn't be 10 threads with why this isn't real or arguing about whether he declassified everything. We should all just be waiting for further evidence.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: NorthOfStuff
Like I've said before, if an arrest is made, it will come after a grand jury indictment. It will be a lot harder for Trump to claim political hit job if the decision to arrest him is made by 16+ random citizens.
originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: asabuvsobelow
Lol, I certainly don't think he had nuclear codes in the basement. However I do believe he had classified documents that he refused to give back.
Funny enough lots of the info I get comes from things from right wing media posted and usually love to use as source material here that refutes what a lot of posters are claiming in their excuses. It seems to make people very angry.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: NorthOfStuff
Like I've said before, if an arrest is made, it will come after a grand jury indictment. It will be a lot harder for Trump to claim political hit job if the decision to arrest him is made by 16+ random citizens.
Why would they have to lie in a warrant, when someone close to the President and Kash himself publicly stated there was classified info. That was the opposite of what the Trump lawyer attested to in June.
In nearly every administration during the last 60 years, materials have been erroneously categorized and/or misplaced. That doesnât mean a crime occurred. Subsequent negotiations with the National Archives is the rule, not the exception. Disagreements can be protracted but are usually resolved amicably.
This makes Attorney General Merrick Garlandâs decision to convene a grand jury and seek a criminal warrant to search and seize documents at Trumpâs home all the more confounding and suspicious. Equally bewildering was his defensive and self-righteous news conference that lasted all of five minutes.
originally posted by: asabuvsobelow
a reply to: Xcalibur254
How does it make anything moot?
Because your not debating Facts , your debating a NARRATIVE .
A media drawn Narrative , Just like the Russia Narrative that ' Networkdude ' just mentioned .
I've said it before I'll say it again , If they had anything on Trump Anything at all we would know about it . I'll also say again that I am not a Trump supporter nor do I like the guy as a person , But his decisions for the USA as POTUS were undeniably wise and forward thinking .
and when Congress Impeached a sitting President for absolutely nothing and laughed about it , I cast aside any Political Affiliation I had Left or Right .