rwatkins
Well, the marines the US deployed began training to respond to the event a year or so before it happened, and when they landed they were armed to the teeth and backed up by missle boats. It was more like an invasion than a rescue mission. America has hospital ships that were not deployed. India too has a hospital ship, at least one, and it was deployed right away. I think if anyone gained, it was the US government, they were free to 'discreetly' slaughter the Tamil Tigers to clear up those pesky problems they've been having with sabotage of their equipment and kidnapping of their workers.

Of course Russia might have gained if there was serious damage to the ExxonMobile LNG pumping stations and shipping apparatus, but that wasn't the case for unknown reasons. There didn't appear to be any damage, and production actually picked up after the event because the Tigers gave it a rest (to regroup and bury their dead). Russia is also known to have tsunami weapons, they were developing them as far back as the 70's-80's, openly too.

And FYI: They haven't just been having aftershocks, they've at least one 5.0 every day since the day after the event, that's unprecedented and inexplicable. Those aren't aftershocks, those are full blown earthquakes. Every day since. It's very strange.

My running theory is that the event cracked open an enormous lava chamber, and the 5.0s are explosions touched off when hot magma touches cold sea water. It's the only explanation I can think of.

The damage would also be consistent with an asteroid impact.

mrsdudara
I'm not sure, I didn't hear anything about it. Unless you're talking about combination fission/fussion bombs, which leave almost no trace radiation because they progress to criticality very rapidly? I doubt those would be tested so callously though. Are you maybe thinking of explosive, fuel/air daisy cutters? But again, I find it hard to believe they would test those in FL though...

If you find any additional information maybe start a thread.

Has the process of nationalization gone ahead as planned? I don't think so.

I'd say the energy barons saw a chip getting taken away from them at the big table and kicked the other player under the board. It makes sense, motive wise. Means, yes, that's been discussed. Oppurtunity, certainly, there are probably 2 dozen oil service ships in the region at any given time, perfectly capable of dropping a diving bell housing the device or dispatching a ROV to deliver it more precisely.

Originally posted by WyrdeOne
rwatkins
Well, the marines the US deployed began training to respond to the event a year or so before it happened, and when they landed they were armed to the teeth and backed up by missle boats. It was more like an invasion than a rescue mission. America has hospital ships that were not deployed. India too has a hospital ship, at least one, and it was deployed right away. I think if anyone gained, it was the US government, they were free to 'discreetly' slaughter the Tamil Tigers to clear up those pesky problems they've been having with sabotage of their equipment and kidnapping of their workers.

I have not heard of this, and would like to check it out. Have you got any good links?

I still think that it's not an effiecent method to use just to take out a few bad guys. That would be like burning the entire orchard to get rid of a few bad apples. America has special forces and conduct black ops for that sort of thing. It's much more precise.

Unless you think they underestimated the size of the devistation or something? You mentioned something about opening a lava chamber. Do you think they accidentally created a bigger problem than what they expected?

Regards.


[edit on 3/27/2005 by rwatkins]

Interesting thread title, nonetheless, however I think today's events.. "8.7 mag earthquake" in the same region may have already debunked your potential conspiracy.

However, you may want to consider this, why didn't they experiment with this potential on Cuba in the '60s? (or are they currently with all the Hurricanes that backfire and hit the SEastern US)

or perhaps Japan in the '40s? Why admittedly drop the bomb, when they could have utilized several tsunamis and blamed the deaths on mother nature??

Just my two cents. (Edit for 2 pennies)

[edit on 3/28/2005 by wizdumb2003]

OH CRAP THEY DID IT AGAIN



hehehe sorry I couldnt resist.

BUT, hay, I was almost a believer, oh well on to the next conspiricy.

I think it is the greys doing these earthquake.You must remember that they are our enemies or it could be the NWO doing it so as to cripple other nations and force them to join NWO.

Yeah, I think this second quake is proof that it wasn't anything other than mother nature. I feel sorry for those people, luckily this one did not generate a tsunami. The number of aftershocks is amazing.

I was wondering where the "HAARP caused the Indonesia earthquake" threads were, hehe.... Seems I found it...

Am I the only one to note that there was a recent planetary alignment between the moon and Jupiter which could have impacted upon these events as well.

One more thing. Indonesia is a largely Islamic country. Given that Islamic people are largely seen as the force behind terror why would these quakes aimed (if you will) at countries like Indonesia and Pakistan?

I have had only one problem with this ... Why ??? And i think I have just discovered. Maybe we are trying out a weapon on a new submarine. There has been alot of talks about subs here lately in the news and all. Hmmm ... maybe a cover up /..??? The really really wierd thing is that another earthquake happend just the other day and they evacuated thee entire coast all around it was less than 200 miles from the last one. Awkward. Would it be possible to move that much water with any man made device.


Another totally different side ... maybe a bomb test gone wrong ???

(posted by mrsdudara)
Hay, what was the name of that new bomb the US tested in Floridia last year? The one that was like a nuke but no ratiation. They said they were going to use it as a scare tactic or something.

I think I know what you're talking about since, in those days, I was following the news daily and around the clock, so I have it all down on paper.

On March 11 or 12, 2003, the U.S. presented to the world its MOAB bomb, the Mother Of All Bombs (conventional, non-nuclear ones, that is), the ultimate blockbuster bomb and the most powerful of all the conventional bombs that have ever been put together (unless there's an even bigger one now).

They did this by making one go off somewhere (wish I knew where...one of the square states maybe?). They were killing three birds with one stone here: not only were they 1) showing it off, but they were also 2) testing it and 3) intimidating Iraq, a country they were threatening to invade.

Specifications
Total weight: 9,450 kilograms (i.e., nearly 9.5 tons)
Explosive load: 8.5 tons of high-power explosives

The bang makes a mushroom-shaped cloud that can be seen from miles away. Its destructive power is 50 percent greater than that of the Daisy Cutter, its predecessor (which WyrdeOne mentions). Satellite guidance makes it 100 percent accurate.

One week later (Mch. 20) the war started with the bombing of Baghdad. Now we need an expert to tell us why no MOABs were used during the war...or were they? Apparently not. That would've been big news and nobody would've missed it.
*

Originally posted by JamesBlonde
Am I the only one to note that there was a recent planetary alignment between the moon and Jupiter which could have impacted upon these events as well.

Jupiter and the moon are in alignment at least once a year, if not more often. Jupiter's pull (even when combined with the moon) is SO small that it doesn't even change the tides one bit.

If it's not strong enough to change the tides, how could it suddenly be strong enough to cause an earthquake and tsunami??

Originally posted by Indellkoffer
Jupiter and the moon are in alignment at least once a year, if not more often. Jupiter's pull (even when combined with the moon) is SO small that it doesn't even change the tides one bit.

If it's not strong enough to change the tides, how could it suddenly be strong enough to cause an earthquake and tsunami??

Well I am thinking something along the same lines as metal fatigue. If you keep playing with it it will fall off.

I only brought this up as what I see as a likely contributing factor.

Seekerof...

Thanks 4 the link...so 2 yrs. later, exactly, it turns out that the data heard on the TV news programs were all sound. The additional ones given out by the U. of Phoenix are noteworthy...

-- Daisy Cutters were used in VN & Afghnst.
-- They're fat and more like harmless satellites or lunar modules, MOABs look mean & slim

...but still no explanation about why they were not used in a war they were developed for. This sounds suspicious. Maybe they were never meant to be used as weapons, but are quakebombs.

MOAB Quakes?
MrsDudara's insight is noteworthy too: the use of conventional bombs so there will be no telltale radiation afterwards. Imagine 200 MOABs placed along a faultline and made to explode at the same instant.

Then you have the sinister Biblical overtones: Moab, son of the Job who was warned to leave the doomed city.
*

answered this before in a few threads but an 8.7 on the richter scale = 1gigaton explosion. we dont have the technology for that. if we used a smaller, physically possible blast to trigger it, it still would have shown up on the richter scale directly prior to the quake.

Originally posted by jprophet420
answered this before in a few threads but an 8.7 on the richter scale = 1gigaton explosion. we dont have the technology for that. if we used a smaller, physically possible blast to trigger it, it still would have shown up on the richter scale directly prior to the quake.

Do you have a link for the seismic charts of the time? I'm a little late to the party with this one and there's too many threads to sort through.