Blood clot risk higher for COVID-19 patients than after vaccination: study

Here comes the Mainstream News Media Outlets cherrying picking the polls and the so called studies turning and making Covid into even more scarier virus then in most countries.

In some Asian countries the virus varient isnt as deadly comapred to the orginal but that isnt stopping the MSM from protecting the vaxs which are causing blood clots.

According to the cherry pick study. Covid Patients have a more of a risk of contracting blood clots from covid than the vaccines like AstraZeneca or Pfizer shots.

Dispute the so many reports of people and paitents who had reported more blood clots after receiving AstraZeneca. This is the MSM cheery picking studies for their narrative like how they did with the poll claiming that the majority of people in every country support vax mandates and vax passports.

These kind of studies arent any different its nothing more then cherry picking.

Blood clot risk higher for COVID-19 patients than after vaccination: study

Here are the headlines cherry picking the title for their narrative.
Contracting COVID-19 increases risk of rare blood clots more than getting vaccine, study shows

Here is the narrative from other stories.

80% of Canadians support COVID-19 vaccine passports for travel: poll

Poll shows majority of Canadians support barring unvaccinated from public gatherings

Poll finds most Canadians support vaccine passports Post navigation < > 67 per cent of respondents favour proof of vaccination for non-essential services

Remember last year?

Can farts spread COVID-19? This Australian researcher claims so!

Now they are claiming that that Contracting COVID-19 increases risk of rare blood clots more then vaccination. Yet there are more reports of BC after vaccination so why are they doing these kind of stories?

Fear Mongering.

Are they claiming that Blood clot risk higher for COVID-19 patients than after vaccination problary because there are more reports of BC in some of the vaxs? probably.

MSM never mentioned last year that you can Blood Clos from last year. Till Blood Clots started appearing in Vaxs this when the story shifted.

A rare BC yet you can get BC from Covid? nonsense
Lisa Shaw: Radio host died due to rare complications of AstraZeneca vaccine, inquest told

I never heard of how covid can cause blood clot considering there is no mechanism for this to occur so I'm calling this study BS.

a reply to: HawkEyi

The MSM has been weaponized against humanity
The health authority has been weaponized against humanity
The scientific community has been weaponized against humanity
The government in the US, China and many other countries around the world have been weaponized against humanity.
The DOJ in US and around the world have been weaponized against humanity.
The CIA has been weaponized against humanity.
The federal reserve and large banks have been weaponized against humanity.
Big tech and social media has been weaponized against humanity

It might seem hopeless, but we can win pretty easily as long as enough people wake up to what is going on. Oh and humanity has God on its side. Nothing can stop what is coming.

a reply to: amazingexplorer
You can indeed get micro clots frtom a virus. But incredibly rare and even if you do, your body produces its own anticoagulant (in limited quantities) to sort them out. But it is incredibly rare for viral clotts to cause any problems.
Rainbows
Jane

June, 2020:

More than one-third of patients seriously ill with COVID-19 worldwide are afflicted with dangerously high levels of blood clotting

www.nature.com...

May, 2020

Purple rashes, swollen legs, clogged catheters and sudden death — blood clots, large and small, are a frequent complication of COVID-19, and researchers are just beginning to untangle why. For weeks, reports have poured in of the disease’s effects throughout the body, many of which are caused by clots.

portside.org...

October, 2020

Early on during the COVID-19 pandemic, it was observed that patients suffering from COVID-19, especially those requiring intensive care unit (ICU)-level care, had high rates of blood clotting, or thrombosis.

journals.sagepub.com...

a reply to: SeventhChapter

It would take enough for the vaxed to realize that they would require every five months of booster shots if they want to continue to enjoy their so called "New Normal" they are already calling this a new normal not old normal.

Its population control while invading our privacy.

a reply to: Phage

There are terms for this sensational reporting.
Anything to prop up fear.


Its what MSM does

a reply to: HawkEyi

You said there was not talk of blood clotting before the vaccines.

It seems you were mistaken. There was quite a lot of talk about it.

Blood clots were a serious concern with covid 19 patients before any of the vaccines were even out of the lab.

But I'm guessing people here won't believe a word of it regardless of the countess papers and articles easily available.



a reply to: Phage

For men or for women? Women are usually excluded from these “studies”.

Can you please provide the data showing that blood clots are more common as a result of a vaccine than they are from covid 19.






a reply to: HawkEyi

I don't think the chance of blood clot depends on either vaccine or covid. Neither has any mechanism to make a blood clot, unless the person already has genetic vulnerability to blood clot anyway.

This article predates the vaccines and talks about blood clots in covid 19 patients.

There's plenty more up to date information out there but it tends to focus more on the vaccines.

theconversation.com...


a reply to: amazingexplorer

a reply to: HawkEyi

I did the math.
You are a thousand times more likely within the same year to have a stroke without the vaccine than you are with it.
CDC estimates suggest that 795000 people have a stroke each year in the United States. Divide that number by the total population and its roughly 0.0024%.
Per million covid vaccine recipients, 14 cases of stroke (blood clot in the brain). This represents 0.000014%.
As the doctor suggests in the video, these statistics make it difficult to tell if the stroke was going to happen anyway, regardless of the vaccine, or if in fact the vaccine is what caused the stroke.

a reply to: Allenb83

Math? We don't need no stinkin' math!

Technically we don't need any maths that contradicts anti Vax nonsense.

Manipulated maths that supports whackjob quacks is a vital part of ATS now.



a reply to: Phage

a reply to: nonspecific

Its Safe and Effective > MSM. Says study done in matter of a month. With No long term studies for the vaxs.

So saying that the vaccine mRNA and virus both make spike proteins is correct, right?

The vaccine is a limited number as mRNA hits half-life in like 8 hours, so you got like a day or so with mRNA making protein. ALL proteins can only last about 3 weeks at best, but in this case the body quickly starts attacking the protein the mRNA made, so maybe a week at best and all that protein is out of your system.

Now you have a virus that can be reproducing for weeks before you get symptoms, and it can take you a week or much longer to get rid of it. During this time the virus is reproducing making a lot of protein over and over flooding your body with it for many weeks not a day like mRNA does.

So saying all this which one do you all think might just be more serious about blood clotting if that is something spike protein can cause?