The disparity in media coverage has little to do with demographics, and much to do with racism. The fact is, missing black children don't matter to most of America, and missing middle class white children do.
Thanks for repeating your statement. I fail to see how giving links matters any.
You just contradicted yourself. Which is it? The fact is, most throwaways and abductions occur in cities, while most runaways come from the suburbs and rural areas and gravitate towards the nearest city, or NY (the mecca of runaways).
I didn't contradict myself. The news focuses on whats different, not what's common. If it isn't common in the suburbs, and if when it happens in the suburbs it's pretty much a given it'll be a white kid, then that explains why they are normally white kids getting covered.
And that makes it okay in your mind? Because I still see it as wrong and deplorable and offensive.
I fail to see what's so evil about it as you try to make it. The media reports only what people care about. People don't care about the typical cases in the city. They care about the out of the ordinary.
Ooohhh, now the truth reveals itself. You have a personal bias against me, so you chose to disagree with me, and attempt to defend an indefensible position. I don't want race warfare, it's not about race anymore. It is about the haves and the have nots.
I don't give a damn about you. I do care about this moral hypocracy shown by liberals, where your idea of kindness is using the government to force the rich to give what they earned to the poor, who are usually poor because of their own mistakes, and not lack of oppertunity.
However, race is still a prime motivating factor in determining what gets air time and what doesn't. There is racism in the reporting of missing and exploited children, that's a fact. Whether it's fueled by a quest for ratings or a personal grudge is irrelevant to this discussion, the fact is, the disparity exists.
That is illogical and baseless. Race is not the factor.


