Exclusive: Hunter Biden Pictures of Himself Half Naked and Exposed With Certain Minor

originally posted by: Annee
Really don’t care.

...sure, you care so little you opened the thread and commented.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

If this was not Hunter with a minor why wouldnt Hunter come forward and state who is the censored person in the picture? Pretty easy to come clean on this unless they had something to hide.

Pretty sure exposing yourself to a minor on purpose is illegal. Folks have been locked up for far less. In fact, fully clothed men have faced charges for becoming erect with a child in lap. This scumbag needs to be perp-walked.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Ringsofsaturn777
Suggesting that only pedos want this looked into further is idiotic.

I left out useful idiots who are being played to make this the topic instead of the potential influence pedaling. The only place this crap is being discussed is on fringe sites because most people need proof which there is zero of.

There you go again pretending that proof is required before any reasonable person would support further investigation. That is so dumb.

originally posted by: drewlander
If this was not Hunter with a minor why wouldnt Hunter come forward and stare who is the censored person in the picture? Pretty easy to come clean on this unless they had something to hide.

Probably because the only place trash like this is being posted is on fringe sites, he probably doesn't even know.

What he does know is about influence pedaling but the ATS Pedo Patrol is doing a good job shifting focus to a non-issue because they are getting played. Hard.

originally posted by: Ringsofsaturn777
There you go again pretending that proof is required before any reasonable person would support further investigation. That is so dumb.

Yeah, it's so dumb to post a picture of him and the alleged minor in bed and say, 'Who is this person?'.

Mental gymnastics = Olympic levels.

originally posted by: Annee
Really don’t care.

Agreed. Do you care if joe is owned by China? Or is that an acceptable price to pay to get Trump out BAMN?

originally posted by: Ringsofsaturn777

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Ringsofsaturn777
Suggesting that only pedos want this looked into further is idiotic.

I left out useful idiots who are being played to make this the topic instead of the potential influence pedaling. The only place this crap is being discussed is on fringe sites because most people need proof which there is zero of.

There you go again pretending that proof is required before any reasonable person would support further investigation. That is so dumb.

It's astonishingly ignorant argument if he does not agree that proof works both ways.

originally posted by: tinktinktink
Pretty sure exposing yourself to a minor on purpose is illegal.

Nope, many parents are seen nude by minors.. adults get nude in locker rooms with minors around..

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

That is your best argument? Its all over the news. Everyone knows about this. Who do I believe? The people trying to figure out who the person is or the guy literally smoking crack that has said nothing?

originally posted by: Annee
Really don’t care.

That is very sick and disgusting.

originally posted by: drewlander
That is your best argument? Its all over the news.

Actually it's not.

Everyone knows about this.

Actually, they don't.

Who do I believe? The people trying to figure out who the person is or the guy literally smoking crack that has said nothing?

You want to figure out who it is? Ask that trash site for the un-pixilated photo of the two of them on the bed not engaged in anything inappropriate, problem solved.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

Yeah, it's so dumb to post a picture of him and the alleged minor in bed and say, 'Who is this person?'.

Mental gymnastics = Olympic levels.

Yes your mental gymnqstics. I said its dumb to pretend that proof is needed before any reasonable person would support further investigation. If we needed proof before any investigation into possible child abuse etc. the pedophiles and other abusers would be ecstatic. Fortunately that isnt how it works.

originally posted by: Ringsofsaturn777
Yes your mental gymnqstics. I said its dumb to pretend that proof is needed...

A pixelated photo is not good enough. Where's the actual evidence?

News flash: There isn't any.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Guess what? In the court of public opinion I do not need a preponderance of evidence to be inclined to believe a crack addicted amateur pornographer may have engaged in lewd activity with a minor. The potential is there. Its not my responsibility to clear his name.

originally posted by: drewlander
Guess what? In the court of public opinion I do not need a preponderance of evidence to be inclined to believe a crack addicted amateur pornographer may have engaged in lewd activity with a minor. The potential is there. Its not my responsibility to clear his name.

Guess what? The court of public opinion is a zero factor in all of this. The court of public opinion is distracting from the actual issues with this stupidity.