Exclusive: Hunter Biden Pictures of Himself Half Naked and Exposed With Certain Minor

originally posted by: KansasGirl
How old is the minor? Are we talking about a 17 year old? Or 12? What?

It appears that it would have been a 14 y/o girl at the time of the incidents.

a reply to: Ringsofsaturn777

You said this was worth investigating. So what “evidence” are we talking about? Would that be videos (that people have said they watched, which is against the law)? Would that be photos with a girl of an unknown age? Because someone on the internets said so?

What’s your “evidence that makes it worth investigating”?

Temporarily closed to allow members to read this:

Not only is this is NOT the Mud Pit!!!

It is also not a place where attacking other members happens.
Members must also Stay on Topic and Respect each other!!!
Reaffirming Our Desire For Productive Political Debate (REVISED)
Community Announcement re: Decorum


Is There Civilization Without Civility


You are responsible for your own posts.....those who ignore that responsibility will face mod actions.
Including temporary Posting Bans.


Remember
Terms And Conditions Of Use


and, as always:

Do NOT reply to this post!!

They have to by law pixelate her face to protect her identity.

So theres pictures of him totally naked holding a crack pipe, with her in bed, and pictures of them both in bed together.

Also in the footjob video the person in it hands him her phone and you can see its the same phone case that Natalie Biden has in her photos she puts on social media.

So the likely story is that yes its Hunter Biden and his 14yo niece, yes he is smoking crack, yes she is being molested by her uncle, and yes Joe Biden and his brother sought to cover it up. That's on top all of the Russian, Ukrainian, Iranian, and Chinese money they took in exchange for influence while Joe was VP, you know quid pro quo, what they impeached Trump for.

Meanwhile all those people who were saying, Trump is a rapist, quid quo pro, russian collusion, are totally silent now saying it's a nothing burger, when there are vastly more evidence showing that its real, even here in our own conspiracy forum.

Shameful.

I see the Biden family pep squad are active today. I seriously can't fathom taking so much time to defend this family. Even if I thought it was all fake. Odd.

Maybe I'm just super awesome at multi-tasking, but I can care about the economy, the state of our nation AND whether or not the Democratic Presidential candidate might be corrupt, or a pedo creep or a target for blackmail or other national security related concerns due to the sexcapades and drugging his son and daughter did, particularly if the son did any of it in foreign countries or if daughter's diary was floating around claiming he showered with her as a child. If I were a LEO and an email hit my desk that suggested that the mother of a minor didn't want said minor to be around someone because he exposed her to inappropriate sexual situations, I would most definitely check it out. Same goes for the diary. I'm sure it is all being investigated and rightly so.

But go on. Defend away. Not a hill I'd choose to die on, personally.

originally posted by: snarfbot
They have to by law pixelate her face to protect her identity.

You by law have to pixelate a minor's face that is not engaged in any lewd, lascivious or illegal activity? Since when?

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

In one photo, of many. Given the context and the existence of more than one sextape, then yes blurring the face is absolutely the correct thing to do, by law, since at least 1998 with COPPA Childrens Online Privacy Protection Rule.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

So being in bed with a naked 49 year old crack addict isn’t lewd or lascivious?

Says you.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
I can't tell if you're playing devils advocate or have some personal stake in this. Multiple thread drifts, vehemently downplaying the seriousness if the situation is true with a minor.

In the game, a 16 year old will easily convince herself to sleep with a dealer to get her fix. May even convince themselves they are in love, even though the dealer passes her around to customers the next week.

But it's all good and dandy and requires no investigation if she isn't screaming for help. Good thing there is no thing as grooming.

originally posted by: Aallanon
Can it be bad that he is a traitor as well as a pedo?

Yes. Evidence keeps mounting and being posted to the GNews.org website.

Also, Whistleblower Tony Bobulinski exposed much of it last night.

Source: www.foxnews.com...

originally posted by: TerryDon79
I just love how people are openly admitting to being pedos.

“Hey everyone! I can 100% confirm that this is real because I watched kiddie porn!” says the group.

“You’re going to jail and being put on a list!” says the judge.

Oh the irony........

If someone is a pedophile for looking at images/video from BH's hard drive.....That certainly makes BH a pedophile by default.

originally posted by: RickinVa

originally posted by: TerryDon79
I just love how people are openly admitting to being pedos.

“Hey everyone! I can 100% confirm that this is real because I watched kiddie porn!” says the group.

“You’re going to jail and being put on a list!” says the judge.

Oh the irony........

If someone is a pedophile for looking at images/video from BH's hard drive.....That certainly makes BH a pedophile by default.

I don’t know where the irony is because I haven’t stated any different.

originally posted by: snarfbot
In one photo, of many. Given the context and the existence of more than one sextape, then yes blurring the face is absolutely the correct thing to do, by law, since at least 1998 with COPPA Childrens Online Privacy Protection Rule.

Doesn't apply, she's allegedly over 13. Try again.

originally posted by: Aallanon
So being in bed with a naked 49 year old crack addict isn’t lewd or lascivious?

For an adult? Don't care what adults do.

As soon as you can figure out that this is a child you should let the authorities know since the Gateway Pundit hasn't.

originally posted by: Nivhk
...if the situation is true with a minor.

As soon as you can prove that it is I'll take it seriously, until then it's a distraction from the actual issues,