This topic is in the Aircraft Projects discussion forum.  (rss)


Favorite Military Aircraft


<<  1    2    3  >>



reply posted on 14-7-2003 @ 04:33 PM by Pyros


Holy crap, the sheer SIZE of this thing!


AN-225

[Edited on 14-7-2003 by Pyros]

[Edited on 14-7-2003 by Pyros]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 15-7-2003 @ 09:03 AM by groingrinder


F6F HELLCAT

MOONLIGHT HELLCAT



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 15-7-2003 @ 11:26 AM by Uninen

My favorite..

www.topedge.com...
Mig-21 in all its variants!
"The MiG-21 is not known for its radar or hauling capabilities, nor for its target acquisition equipment or range, but its known that in many ways it was a pilot's plane. It doesn't have any computers or fancy navigation equipment. It very much depends on the pilot and his (hopefully) good training and experience. That, we all know now, was the MiG-21's Achilles verse in many of the wars it had to fight, and is responsible for the not so impressive combat records that it actually deserves."


[Edited on 15-7-2003 by Uninen]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 15-7-2003 @ 06:13 PM by $tranger



Originally posted by Uninen
www.topedge.com...
Mig-21 in all its variants!
"The MiG-21 is not known for its radar or hauling capabilities, nor for its target acquisition equipment or range, but its known that in many ways it was a pilot's plane. It doesn't have any computers or fancy navigation equipment. It very much depends on the pilot and his (hopefully) good training and experience. That, we all know now, was the MiG-21's Achilles verse in many of the wars it had to fight, and is responsible for the not so impressive combat records that it actually deserves."


[Edited on 15-7-2003 by Uninen]



israeli mig-21 2000

external image

[Edited on 16-7-2003 by $tranger]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-7-2003 @ 02:31 AM by Uninen

LoL

...Last new build mig-21s were to the mig-21bis standard.. and even in that standart its avionics were inferior to the f-4 of usaf.. with radar range of 20-25km. I rest my case. Modified aircraft do not count..



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-7-2003 @ 07:43 AM by Mat


The F-26 STALMA but only if the project works out.

Otherwise I would go with F - 111 Advark.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-7-2003 @ 08:39 AM by ThermoNuke


Mine is DEFIENTLY the F-14 Tomcat. Although a couple decades old by now, It still remains the NAVY's essential air superiority fighter. It's carries one of the most powerful aircraft mounted radar systems known to man. (AN/AWG-9) which was later replaced with the digital version the (AN/APG71). The F-14 Is alost the only aircraft in the Navy's arsenal that can carry the AIM-54 Phoenix Missle, The Navy's only long range air to air missle with a range in excess of 100 nautical miles. The F-14 was also designed to blow Migs out of the sky, And as far as i know, Its quite good at it

external image

[Edited on 16-7-2003 by ThermoNuke]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-7-2003 @ 10:56 AM by $tranger



Originally posted by ThermoNuke
Mine is DEFIENTLY the F-14 Tomcat. Although a couple decades old by now, It still remains the NAVY's essential air superiority fighter. It's carries one of the most powerful aircraft mounted radar systems known to man. (AN/AWG-9) which was later replaced with the digital version the (AN/APG71). The F-14 Is alost the only aircraft in the Navy's arsenal that can carry the AIM-54 Phoenix Missle, The Navy's only long range air to air missle with a range in excess of 100 nautical miles. The F-14 was also designed to blow Migs out of the sky, And as far as i know, Its quite good at it

external image

[Edited on 16-7-2003 by ThermoNuke]



The Mig31 has got an greater range, with air-tot air refeulling the can fly over 10 hours missions
And the Mig-31's are designed to operate without GCI(Ground Controlled Intercept) or ACI (Air Controlled Intercept) The Mig-31 can operate as an mini-awacs. MiG-31s are most often used in group of four (or even eight), linked together by datalink. Operating together, four MiG-31s can cover a strip of territory 900 km (560 miles) across, and targets can be transferred rapidly from one aircraft to another, with all aircraft sharing the same image on their tactical situation displays
The F-14 can fly at speeds up to Mach 2 It has an Max mach number of 2.35 and and cruise mach number 1.2.
> > While the Mig-31 can fly mach 3 (only for twenty minutes) and the Mig 31 has and cruising speed of mach 2.35 and can fly at this speeds for an longer time
> > The mission radius of an Mig-31 used as an interceptor is 1135 nm. The mission radias of an F-14 is 500 nm. This is without refeulling.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-7-2003 @ 12:54 PM by jetsetter


[Edited on 16-7-2003 by jetsetter]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-7-2003 @ 01:34 PM by Uninen

To the Tomcat..

Quite good taking out migs? The f-14.. *Hmm* 2 libyan downgraded mig-23 variants (the s model?) and 2 su-22 of the same airforce.. have tomcats downed.. back into 80s (83 and 89?) ..that tells me only that libyans dont know how to fly..



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-7-2003 @ 01:38 PM by Leveller


I've got two.
The Spitfire and The Hurricane.

They saved my skanky butt.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-7-2003 @ 03:51 AM by Seekerof


You guys can scoof all day if you want to concerning the F-14, but the Russians (and $tranger, in all his stubborness over Russian aircraft) should atest to what I am going to say.......but the Russians actually feared that plane and the Pheonix system it utilized.

Fess up $tranger....be honest for once concerning US equipment.

regards
seekerof



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-7-2003 @ 08:19 PM by Bob88


when I think of dogfights I don't think they are the same these days as in WW II. So, I think the P51 was a great plane: Great range, great kill ratio, speed, etc. And being able to escort bombers all the way to their target must surely have helped end the war just a little sooner!

In terms of bombers I once stood directly under a B2 at an airshow during a fly by. The crowd, myself included, was in total awe. I can't explain it other than it just didnt seem like any aircraft I'd ever seen. Sounded different, was 'odd'.

the A10 is also a neat aircraft and also the F14 (ever since seeing Top Gun when I was a kid)



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-8-2003 @ 08:10 PM by Uninen

:)

But if was forced to chose some other than Mig-21.. (witch is still my nro.1) I would chose F-18 c/d (In our airforce they are F- not F/A- as they are used only as interceptors and we have no air to ground weapons for them .. in Finland) It is allso quite impressive and i have seen those planes from very near.. (In Finnish defence force.. AAA shooting camp they flew with those target sorties for us.. over flew directly over me [and our gun position.. simulating a incoming fighter-bomber target] at 100m about 20 times.. great noise they make!)

[Edited on 6-8-2003 by Uninen]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-8-2003 @ 08:19 PM by Thorfinn Skullsplitter


f-14 Tomcat has always been my favorite ever since the old f-14 Tomcat VF-1 Wolfpack toys, I believe they were...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-8-2003 @ 05:24 AM by Russky


My all time favorite Western aircraft is F-4 Phantom II.
My favorite Soviet plane is MiG-21.


Originally posted by Uninen
...Last new build mig-21s were to the mig-21bis standard.. and even in that standart its avionics were inferior to the f-4 of usaf.. with radar range of 20-25km. I rest my case. Modified aircraft do not count..

Every plane is built for a certain mission. It's not wise to demand a long range interceptor capability from a frontline fighter, isn't it? Will you ask an A-10 to be as good in BVR combat as an F-15? If an aircraft succeeds in a role it was built for then we can say it is a good one. Just ask Phantom II pilots who fell prey to the Vietnamese and Arabian MiGs.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-8-2003 @ 07:03 PM by DJDOHBOY

F14

It just has to be the Gruman F14 Tomcat

external image



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-8-2003 @ 07:25 PM by Uninen

:/

This Russian guy totally miss understood me.. My point in telling of mig-21s "bad avoinics" was to point out that even with these sortages it was in combat when flown by TRAINED pilots much better than American planes of same generation..

And other thing.. i really dont understand this F-14 hype.. sorry to tell you that it is obsolete (by now..) and a bad dogfighter.. It aint agile at all.. just clumsy and heavy.. Only good what it has is speed and range..

[Edited on 7-8-2003 by Uninen]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 8-8-2003 @ 06:38 PM by SilverDeath


The MiG-25... fastest jet fighter of all time at Mach 3.2, well for now at least.


external image


external image

the jet kind of reminds me of a paper air plane but nethertheless it is an awsome piece of machinary sure it had crappy electronics but it has pheonomenal speed and rate of climb.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-8-2003 @ 11:48 AM by Outtis


SU-25! What a great airplane. Feared by mujahideen soldiers!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2    3  >>







Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:















































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.138 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread