It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Charlie Murphy
Perhaps Im sounding a little negative, but what if we just believed anything and everything. If there was any proof at all of God I would believe but to date I have not found any so I will remain Agnostic. You may think I am not looking but if God wanted me to believe wouldn't he/she/it tell me?
Originally posted by Charlie Murphy
That is the exact opposite of what I'm trying to say. Accusations must be assumed false until proven true. That sounds like innocent until proven guilty to me.
Originally posted by junglejake
Theories are not human, and they do not feel feelings. As a result, innocent until proven guilty should not be applied.
Originally posted by junglejake
Many claim evolution is one of those theories. Other, less intellectually honest folk, say it has been proven, though, which is false as well.
Originally posted by expert999
ok I have a question, if evolution is true, then how do you determine what is right and what is wrong?
and by that I mean, where is the standard?
Originally posted by expert999
ok I have a question, if evolution is true, then how do you determine what is right and what is wrong?
and by that I mean, where is the standard?
Originally posted by spamandham
Originally posted by junglejake
Theories are not human, and they do not feel feelings. As a result, innocent until proven guilty should not be applied.
I'm wondering how you have enough energy to make it through the day. The presumption of falseness does two things; first, it places the burdon of proving something onto the person who makes the claim. Since time and effort must be expended to prove things, people will only propose those things that they have a reason to propose. Second, if the burdon is reversed, then an often impossible obligation is put on everyone else of proving a negative.
From the Indian Vedas of course. The only two possibilities are that evolution is true and morality originates from the Indian Vedas, or evolution is false and morality was handed down to us from aliens.
These are the only two possibilities. If you disagree, it's because you have a different wolrd view, not because there's anything wrong with my reasoning.
Originally posted by junglejake
Er...I thought that's what I had said. However, y'all got me wondering why you're wondering how I have enought energy to make it through the day. I don't think I've been complaining online about the massive influx of worthless, boring meetings at work the past few weeks...
Originally posted by junglejake
I will, however, say there's not a preponderance of evidence that species macro evolve.
Originally posted by junglejake
Can you justify that? I have no idea what you're talking about, largely because I have no idea what the Indian Vedas is, but I'm guessing its a religious text.
Originally posted by junglejake
Also, for someone who seems really upset at willing ignorance, you certainly make a point of discounting any possibility of God. After all, it's either the Indian Vedas with evolution or it's aliens, only two options, no space for God. Is it not possible, just possible, that you could be wrong in your assumption that there is no God figure?
Originally posted by Charlie Murphy
Saint, I will always have an open mind for God, but I doubt you will suddenly change my mind.
Originally posted by Charlie Murphy
Even if everything in the Bible is true it could easily be attributed to Aliens.
Originally posted by Charlie Murphy
I'm not even saying God doesn't exist, just that maybe we haven't met it yet.
Originally posted by Charlie Murphy
I hope you have an open mind towards evolution, or The Big Bang. I will continue to learn as much as I can, and hope you do. Maybe sometime within my lifetime we will find bacteria on Mars, to change my beliefs completely.
If you wish to share your proof, then by all means do.
What do you mean by 'macro' evolve?
Originally posted by expert999
micro evolution is in fact scientific. there are different species of the same kind. in other words a variety of the same kind. kinda like small dog big dog, different types of dogs but they are all the same KIND of animal.
Originally posted by expert999
What do you mean by 'macro' evolve?
macro evoution would be the change from one KIND of animal or plant to a different KIND of animal or plant.
Originally posted by junglejake
Yet, with all those experiments, all those millions of generations being put through the ropes forcing evolution, never, I repeat, never has a friut fly ever given birth to anything but another fruit fly.
Originally posted by saint4God
I know I can't change your mind, but can hope and pray that you'd get the proof you need soon. In the meanwhile, I'll offer to help you get connected. Just let me know what you need. If you're not sure what you need, a good place to start is by trying to identify what obstacles are in the way.
I've talked with Him, felt him, come to know a lot, and heard him (but not through the ears).
I have an open mind towards evolution and The Big Bang. Too gappy for me to be convinced of evolution and was a supporter of The Big Bang until recent info stating red-shift spectroscopy is showing that the universe is not expanding from an epicenter. Whooboy, rock my scientific world baby! So now what?
Er...how would that change your beliefs completely?
Originally posted by junglejake
They never developed a digestive system and mouth to extend their lives. They never consistently developed a mutation such as 4 wings instead of two....
Originally posted by Charlie Murphy
Maybe if you told me why you believe(I know its not that simple) it could give me a different perpspective. Could you tell me why you hope it happens soon?
When you talk to God that is perfectly normal, but when he talks back people call you crazy. Do you think God told Adolph Hitler to slaughter millions of jews?
Even if the Big Bang is totally and completely false, when we discover new information a new theory will build upon the throey of The Big Bang in a way that makes sense. In that way I see that science can never be wrong because it is always changing.
Well maybe not my beliefs but I would view, or do things very differently. Just think about how it would affect humanity. Even if it is only bacteria, then "little green men" would be taken more seriously. Maybe we would feel more united as mankind and stop foolishly fighting countless wars that accomplish nothing.
Originally posted by expert999
you cannot take two KINDS of animals and get offspring.