It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: neoholographic
if it can happen "by design" then it can happen by accident, the means are viable and so the probability has been demonstrated. evolution can be artificed in small degrees by modern technology but the planet has been doing it for hundreds of millions of years, just like birds inspiring planes. maybe we are just dumb and have a hard time keeping up with basic engineering that is common sense to nature.
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
a reply to: neoholographic
You totally nailed this..you smart.
The fact is, believing in Santa Claus makes more sense than believing in a natural interpretation of evolution.
DNA would have to encode it's sequence first to each amino acid that's used to build proteins, then code the sequence of proteins that form a polypeptide chain to fold into a protein. It would have to encode on a sequence where to stop and to start and it would have to encode itself with the information to build these small molecular machines sometimes made up of 100 different parts that just work together to carry out a specific function.
originally posted by: cooperton
originally posted by: Barcs
Another useless thread repeating all the same bull# as always. Maybe one day an honest creationist will post here and not need to lie about genetics and evolution. Wishful thinking LOL.
You're a thorn in every thread you enter. How about some peaceful productive input for once?
originally posted by: Barcs
originally posted by: cooperton
originally posted by: Barcs
Another useless thread repeating all the same bull# as always. Maybe one day an honest creationist will post here and not need to lie about genetics and evolution. Wishful thinking LOL.
You're a thorn in every thread you enter. How about some peaceful productive input for once?
I'm trying to save people's sense of logic and reason.
The OP has made this same topic dozens of times. Literally nothing new has been brought up here, just the same dishonest assertions about evolution.
originally posted by: Barcs
I'm trying to save people's sense of logic and reason.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
And the same suspicious silence from this hypothetical creation figure.
The book Information Theory, Evolution and the Origin of Life is written by Hubert Yockey, the foremost living specialist in bioinformatics. The publisher is Cambridge University press. Yockey rigorously demonstrates that the coding process in DNA is identical to the coding process and mathematical definitions used in Electrical Engineering. This is not subjective, it is not debatable or even controversial. It is a brute fact:
“Information, transcription, translation, code, redundancy, synonymous, messenger, editing, and proofreading are all appropriate terms in biology. They take their meaning from information theory (Shannon, 1948) and are not synonyms, metaphors, or analogies.” (Hubert P. Yockey, Information Theory, Evolution, and the Origin of Life, Cambridge University Press, 2005)
originally posted by: neoholographic
a reply to: cooperton
Good points! Here's another example to show how silly a natural interpretation of evolution is.
Let's say I have a red cup and a blue cup and I say if the red cup is faced down and the blue cup is faced up then meet me at Longhorn on MLK. If the red cup is faced up and the blue cup is faced down, meet me at Olive Garden on 4th St. Downtown.
I have just encoded information on the sequence of the cups. The cups contain no information. There just the medium. This is the same with DNA. DNA is just a storage medium and we have learned that it's a very powerful storage medium.
DNA could store all of the world's data in one room
www.sciencemag.org...
It's a storage medium.
It doesn't create information, it stores it. We have stored things like books and CD's on DNA because we know the code. DNA, doesn't create the information from the book or CD. Intelligence creates that information and DNA stores it on its sequence.
Let's go back to the above example. Intelligence can keep storing information on a medium's sequence. How long this information stays encoded depends on how durable the storage medium is. So I can say:
I have a red cup and a blue cup and I say if the red cup is faced down and the blue cup is faced up then meet me at Longhorn on MLK and catch an uber and I will take you home..
If the red cup is faced up and the blue cup is faced down, meet me at Olive Garden on 4th St. Downtown and drive your car because I have to go back to the office after we eat.
In the bold text, I just added more information into the same sequence! The cups don't encode its sequence with information. It's crazy that I have to even argue this point but a natural interpretation of evolution is a blind belief so people who support it will accept the illogical.
Here's a Genetic Code chart.
Met is usually the start codon with AUG and you can see the stop codons. Here you have a sequence that's encoded with information. It also builds the machinery to read the information encoded on a sequence. A sequence will look like this:
AUG CCA GAC....
Now translation knows where to start. This code is transcribed into mRNA then translated. This is of course shortened and simplified.
Reading the chart, you get the amino acid Proline then Aspartic Acid. We know this because this information encoded on it's sequence. This has to come from intelligence.
The information encoded on its sequence is abstract. Like, meet me at Longhorn at 4 PM or you can build the machinery to assemble a microwave. The information to build the microwave comes from an intelligent mind. The parts of the microwave don't encode instruction on how to build a microwave.
DNA is the same thing. As intelligent minds, we recognize this and can use the code to encode information like a book or CD. You can write code now on a computer, that code will then be compiled into DNA and the computer code you write can be inserted into bacteria. Here's more from Yockey:
The book Information Theory, Evolution and the Origin of Life is written by Hubert Yockey, the foremost living specialist in bioinformatics. The publisher is Cambridge University press. Yockey rigorously demonstrates that the coding process in DNA is identical to the coding process and mathematical definitions used in Electrical Engineering. This is not subjective, it is not debatable or even controversial. It is a brute fact:
“Information, transcription, translation, code, redundancy, synonymous, messenger, editing, and proofreading are all appropriate terms in biology. They take their meaning from information theory (Shannon, 1948) and are not synonyms, metaphors, or analogies.” (Hubert P. Yockey, Information Theory, Evolution, and the Origin of Life, Cambridge University Press, 2005)
evo2.org...
A natural interpretation belongs on Fantasy Island with Tattoo!
originally posted by: moebius
a reply to: neoholographic
For every successful mutation there have been countless failures/errors. More DNA changes are harmful than being beneficial. The harmful ones are then weeded out by natural selection.
Intelligent design proponents like you only see the successful mutations and then arrive at the erroneous assumption that those mutations could not have happened by chance.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: neoholographic
a reply to: cooperton
Good points! Here's another example to show how silly a natural interpretation of evolution is.
Let's say I have a red cup and a blue cup and I say if the red cup is faced down and the blue cup is faced up then meet me at Longhorn on MLK. If the red cup is faced up and the blue cup is faced down, meet me at Olive Garden on 4th St. Downtown.
I have just encoded information on the sequence of the cups. The cups contain no information. There just the medium. This is the same with DNA. DNA is just a storage medium and we have learned that it's a very powerful storage medium.
DNA could store all of the world's data in one room
www.sciencemag.org...
It's a storage medium.
It doesn't create information, it stores it. We have stored things like books and CD's on DNA because we know the code. DNA, doesn't create the information from the book or CD. Intelligence creates that information and DNA stores it on its sequence.
Let's go back to the above example. Intelligence can keep storing information on a medium's sequence. How long this information stays encoded depends on how durable the storage medium is. So I can say:
I have a red cup and a blue cup and I say if the red cup is faced down and the blue cup is faced up then meet me at Longhorn on MLK and catch an uber and I will take you home..
If the red cup is faced up and the blue cup is faced down, meet me at Olive Garden on 4th St. Downtown and drive your car because I have to go back to the office after we eat.
In the bold text, I just added more information into the same sequence! The cups don't encode its sequence with information. It's crazy that I have to even argue this point but a natural interpretation of evolution is a blind belief so people who support it will accept the illogical.
Here's a Genetic Code chart.
Met is usually the start codon with AUG and you can see the stop codons. Here you have a sequence that's encoded with information. It also builds the machinery to read the information encoded on a sequence. A sequence will look like this:
AUG CCA GAC....
Now translation knows where to start. This code is transcribed into mRNA then translated. This is of course shortened and simplified.
Reading the chart, you get the amino acid Proline then Aspartic Acid. We know this because this information encoded on it's sequence. This has to come from intelligence.
The information encoded on its sequence is abstract. Like, meet me at Longhorn at 4 PM or you can build the machinery to assemble a microwave. The information to build the microwave comes from an intelligent mind. The parts of the microwave don't encode instruction on how to build a microwave.
DNA is the same thing. As intelligent minds, we recognize this and can use the code to encode information like a book or CD. You can write code now on a computer, that code will then be compiled into DNA and the computer code you write can be inserted into bacteria. Here's more from Yockey:
The book Information Theory, Evolution and the Origin of Life is written by Hubert Yockey, the foremost living specialist in bioinformatics. The publisher is Cambridge University press. Yockey rigorously demonstrates that the coding process in DNA is identical to the coding process and mathematical definitions used in Electrical Engineering. This is not subjective, it is not debatable or even controversial. It is a brute fact:
“Information, transcription, translation, code, redundancy, synonymous, messenger, editing, and proofreading are all appropriate terms in biology. They take their meaning from information theory (Shannon, 1948) and are not synonyms, metaphors, or analogies.” (Hubert P. Yockey, Information Theory, Evolution, and the Origin of Life, Cambridge University Press, 2005)
evo2.org...
A natural interpretation belongs on Fantasy Island with Tattoo!
If intelligent design is so easily reverse engineered then why haven't humans being upgraded in the last few thousand years? Why are homo sapiens still the most advanced species when we can easily improve on so called divine design using the same tools written in your bible? Why is it so hard to fix our world when its a simple matter of coding?
WHAT IS BIODESIGN?
Put simply, biodesign is the intersection between biology and design: It’s a growing movement (literally) of scientists, artists, and designers that integrates organic processes and materials into the creation of our buildings, our products, and even our clothing. That can mean, for example, growing a chair out of mycelium, the mushroom fungus that makes for a surprisingly durable material for furniture. It can mean actually altering the DNA of living organisms using genetic engineering techniques, such as with GMO foods.
A scientist has a DNA sequence of interest and wants a list of all CRISPR targets contained in the sequence. Finding every target by hand is tedious and error prone.
The scientist wants a simple program where they can input a DNA sequence and have all possible Cas9 target sites returned. The scientist would also like the cut position and PAM sequence for each target site.
EXAMPLE INPUT (from Figure 1): 'CCACGGTTTCTGTAGCCCCATACTTTGGATG'
EXAMPLE OUTPUT: [[ 'cut_pos': 6, 'pam_seq': 'TGG', 'target_seq': 'GTATGGGGCTACAGAAACCG',
originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: cooperton
I probably wouldnt be. Im the sort of person who believes any sort of authority position requires actual leadership skills and not just necromancy that is convenient for their personal agenda.
originally posted by: cooperton
originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: cooperton
I probably wouldnt be. Im the sort of person who believes any sort of authority position requires actual leadership skills and not just necromancy that is convenient for their personal agenda.
Leadership skills such as willing to die for their truth that cause no one harm? Jesus epitomized every archetypal trait of a good leader. Why do you have such resentment towards him?
originally posted by: moebius
a reply to: neoholographic
For every successful mutation there have been countless failures/errors. More DNA changes are harmful than being beneficial. The harmful ones are then weeded out by natural selection.
Intelligent design proponents like you only see the successful mutations and then arrive at the erroneous assumption that those mutations could not have happened by chance.
The book Information Theory, Evolution and the Origin of Life is written by Hubert Yockey, the foremost living specialist in bioinformatics. The publisher is Cambridge University press. Yockey rigorously demonstrates that the coding process in DNA is identical to the coding process and mathematical definitions used in Electrical Engineering. This is not subjective, it is not debatable or even controversial. It is a brute fact:
“Information, transcription, translation, code, redundancy, synonymous, messenger, editing, and proofreading are all appropriate terms in biology. They take their meaning from information theory (Shannon, 1948) and are not synonyms, metaphors, or analogies.” (Hubert P. Yockey, Information Theory, Evolution, and the Origin of Life, Cambridge University Press, 2005)
originally posted by: Barcs
Another useless thread repeating all the same bull# as always. Maybe one day an honest creationist will post here and not need to lie about genetics and evolution. Wishful thinking LOL.