It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Research indicates that major wildfires now burn nearly double the area they did in 1970, and other factors such as earlier snowmelt contribute to the dry conditions that create the fires.
The California water wars were a series of political conflicts between the city of Los Angeles and farmers and ranchers in the Owens Valley of Eastern California over water rights.
As Los Angeles expanded during the late 19th century, it began outgrowing its water supply. Fred Eaton, mayor of Los Angeles, realized that water could flow from Owens Valley to Los Angeles via an aqueduct. The aqueduct construction was overseen by William Mulholland and was finished in 1913. The water rights were acquired through political fighting and, as described by one author, "chicanery, subterfuge ... and a strategy of lies".[1]:62
Since 1913, the Owens River had been diverted to Los Angeles, causing the ruin of the valley's economy. By the 1920s, so much water was diverted from the Owens Valley that agriculture became difficult. This led to the farmers trying to destroy the aqueduct in 1924. Los Angeles prevailed and kept the water flowing. By 1926, Owens Lake at the bottom of Owens Valley was completely dry due to water diversion.
4) back to water. Yes the present water system can barely support the population. Its not a question of building more dams. There is not a lot of viable places to build anymore. Expansion of existing watersheds and dams is possible, but at some point, you will not be able to balance the needs of agriculture and the population. This is not only a CA issue mind you but cities and states and countries are all struggling with this.
originally posted by: Zrtst
a reply to: FredT
May I happily confess to be the worst kind of denier, and point to Tony Heller's vids as my guide? Guilty...now what happens to me ?
originally posted by: FredT
So to be honest I think its a combination of a ton of things:
originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: network dude
It's time to get rid of fossil fuels with a viable alternative.
originally posted by: Deplorable
originally posted by: FredT
So to be honest I think its a combination of a ton of things:
You left out the possibility that this has been acts of terrorism all along.
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: network dude
It's time to get rid of fossil fuels with a viable alternative.
Totally agree. What should we use?
They are sucking the water dry in California which is why the trees are parched and burn easier.
originally posted by: FredT
While you can debate the cause and how to mitigate it, the reality is that the climate is changing and not for the better.
originally posted by: FredT
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: network dude
It's time to get rid of fossil fuels with a viable alternative.
Totally agree. What should we use?
Obviously wind and solar will go a long way especially if we develop the ability for large scale dispatch-able storage. For that 530 PM conundrum. Off shore wind coupled with solar and any combination of:
Pumped hydroelectric power (excess electricity pumps water to a watershed higher up then releases it when needed)
Compressed air storage (same thing but with air)
Molten Salt storage
Utility grid battery banks