It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

What Republicans should do to end the impeachment farce

page: 13
18
<< 10  11  12    14  15 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 16 2019 @ 08:32 PM
link   
November 16, 2019

Schiff Impeachment Witness TIM MORRISON testifies that ALEXANDER VINDMANN exhibited poor judgement, and was a "leaker".

Source: twitter.com...




posted on Nov, 16 2019 @ 08:39 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I know where extraordinary appears in the Constitution. Article 2, Section 3....and man, would sparks fly if it was put into play right now.


he may, on extraordinary occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in case of disagreement between them, with respect to the time of adjournment, he may adjourn them to such time as he shall think proper;

edit on 16-11-2019 by Ahabstar because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 16 2019 @ 08:40 PM
link   
Sat 11/16/2019

A "leak" from today's disposition in Schiff's basement bunker.

Rep. Lee Zeldin says: twitter.com...

Pelosi-Schiff's slow-motion impeachment train wreck continues.



posted on Nov, 17 2019 @ 08:46 AM
link   
a reply to: Ahabstar

Yes, I posted that previously. It's the only place it appears.



posted on Nov, 17 2019 @ 10:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: Ahabstar
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I know where extraordinary appears in the Constitution. Article 2, Section 3....and man, would sparks fly if it was put into play right now.

"he may, on extraordinary occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in case of disagreement between them, with respect to the time of adjournment, he may adjourn them to such time as he shall think proper;"

That would be hilarious!



posted on Nov, 17 2019 @ 10:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: Ahabstar

Yes, I posted that previously. It's the only place it appears.

Says the guy that believes that impeachment is just an ordinary, every day power subject to ordinary every day rules.



posted on Nov, 17 2019 @ 11:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: tanstaafl
Says the guy that believes that impeachment is just an ordinary, every day power subject to ordinary every day rules.


It is because the Constitution says it is.

But feel free to forward your plan to numbnuts Nunez and see if that dope runs with it.



posted on Nov, 17 2019 @ 11:58 AM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

The Extraordinary Powers Clause hasn't shown up yet?

Dang.



posted on Nov, 17 2019 @ 12:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Ahabstar

They've already agreed on the term however.



posted on Nov, 17 2019 @ 12:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
The Extraordinary Powers Clause hasn't shown up yet?

Dang.


Not yet, maybe Devy Cowhater can introduce a proposal to change the Constitution to make our friend happy.

Right after he gets through mauling Twitter...



posted on Nov, 17 2019 @ 12:06 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Oh, you were thinking the issue of impeachment...I was thinking of the many, many other issues that the House and Senate are divided upon.



posted on Nov, 17 2019 @ 12:07 PM
link   
a reply to: Ahabstar

Mmhmm.




posted on Nov, 18 2019 @ 07:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: tanstaafl
Says the guy that believes that impeachment is just an ordinary, every day power subject to ordinary every day rules.


It is because the Constitution says it is.

Oh really? By all means, show us where in the Constitution it says that 'the Power of Impeachment' is an ordinary power.



posted on Nov, 18 2019 @ 07:44 AM
link   
a reply to: tanstaafl

"Hur-dur, prove a negative.'

The fact that it doesn't have a qualifier means it's the same as Congress' other responsibilities.


(post by tanstaafl removed for a manners violation)

posted on Nov, 18 2019 @ 07:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
The fact that it doesn't have a qualifier means it's the same as Congress' other responsibilities.

Yeah... in spite of the fact that it has only been used 3 times in the entire 250+ year history of our country. Oh, and never mind that fact that if successful, it actually has the result of negating the will of the people who elected the President.

Yeah, pretty danged ordinary, you got me there.



posted on Nov, 18 2019 @ 07:48 AM
link   
a reply to: tanstaafl

Its usage amount does not magically add a qualifier as you so feverishly desire.



posted on Nov, 18 2019 @ 07:51 AM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Like coining money and regulating the value there of, maintaining the postal roads, issuing Letters of Marque and Reprisal. Common Congress stuff instead of gun grabbing, baby killing and maintaining a standing army...



posted on Nov, 18 2019 @ 07:53 AM
link   
a reply to: Ahabstar

Yup, the checks and balances aspect is the same as all of their other responsibilities.



posted on Nov, 18 2019 @ 10:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: tanstaafl

Its usage amount does not magically add a qualifier as you so feverishly desire.

-yawn-

Since you're so intent on stalking me, the least you can do is give me a decent massage...



new topics

top topics



 
18
<< 10  11  12    14  15 >>

log in

join