It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mwm1331
wrong interepid, America does not belobng to everyone, it does not for example belong to you, you are not American. America belongs to Americans
Originally posted by DrHoracid
How is it that tax dollars are taken at "gunpoint" so a very small group of "anti-god" biggots can spew their vile vommit on our children? Too many have removed there children from public schools becuase the schools didn't teach values or really much of anything except "social engineering" BS.
Make the all powerful "OZ" edu-crates accountable. Stop paying school taxes until they change or make congress provide vouchers.
Don't just "take-it" and move on. Take back our schools............
Originally posted by dawnstar
I don't know Doc.
How is it that my husband's tax money can be taken from him, to provide medical care for someone else's snotty nosed kid to see a doctor and learn that it's a cold, but when I ask for help, well, it's too bad, tough luck, sorry we can't help you....even when I can prove it on paper that we can't even afford the monthly insurance payment and retain the roof over our heads, food on the table, transportation to work, ect..let alone the additional costs. And, it's quite possible the my condition might deteriorate to the point where I can no longer walk!!
I'm sick of the "christian" bickering of their rights being so horribly violated.
Originally posted by DrHoracid
Christian values are being taken away by thieves in black ropes almost daily.
Originally posted by marg6043
Originally posted by Off_The_Street
marg says:
Marg, Mr. Horacid and Mr. Nygdan and Mr. Intrepid and I are having a grownup conversation here.
Hum......may be you all should start your own conspiracy site, all in the name of religion and fundamentalism.
By the way the ATS forums is for everybody not only some...........so I may take it as an isult.
Originally posted by Odd
just because some of you are not Christians does not mean that others do not have the right to worship as they choose. For all your posturing and claims of loving freedom, you sure do spend a lot of time telling people that they ought not to be able to raise their kids how they bloody well please.
so Christians are stupid, and the religion should be banned?
how can you call yourself a lover of freedom, or of America, when you obviously believe that the only way is your own?
james the lesser
Anyways, George Washington was a Mason, not a christian. So there goes founded on christian values
drhoracid
Your right and teaching so called "multi-culturalisim" which is basically every religion other than Christianity
Someone please tell the the "HARM" is allowing parents to send their kids to a "values" based school?
How is it that tax dollars are taken at "gunpoint" so a very small group of "anti-god" biggots can spew their vile vommit on our children?
Christian values are being taken away by thieves in black ropes almost daily.
Originally posted by Nygdan
I would agree tho that america is not a 'christian country', its government is, and was intended to be, secular, by most of the founders themselves. They created a republic, not a theocracy.
drhoracid
Your right and teaching so called "multi-culturalisim" which is basically every religion other than Christianity
Again, more untruth and distortion from you. Historical studies that explain the basic beleifs of other religions are not teaching other religions and are not limiting christianity, any more than explaining what lead to protestant and catholic warfare in europe is endorsing either of those religions and slamming greek orthodoxy.
Someone please tell the the "HARM" is allowing parents to send their kids to a "values" based school?
Using public money to teach religion.
Madison's original proposal for a bill of rights provision concerning religion read: ''The civil rights of none shall be abridged on account of religious belief or worship, nor shall any national religion be established, nor shall the full and equal rights of conscience be in any manner, or on any pretence, infringed.'' The language was altered in the House to read: ''Congress shall make no law establishing religion, or to prevent the free exercise thereof, or to infringe the rights of conscience.'' In the Senate, the section adopted read: ''Congress shall make no law establishing articles of faith, or a mode of worship, or prohibiting the free exercise of religion, . . .'' It was in the conference committee of the two bodies, chaired by Madison, that the present language was written.
The danger of silent accumulations & encroachments by Ecclesiastical Bodies have not sufficiently engaged attention in the U.S. They have the noble merit of first unshackling the conscience from persecuting laws, and of establishing among religious Seas a legal equality. If some of the States have not embraced this just and this truly Xn principle in its proper latitude, all of them present examples by which the most enlightened States of the old world may be instructed; and there is one State at least, Virginia, where religious liberty is placed on its true foundation and is defined in its full latitude. The general principle is contained in her declaration of rights, prefixed to her Constitution: but it is unfolded and defined, in its precise extent, in the act of the Legislature, usually named the Religious Bill, which passed into a law in the year 1786. Here the separation between the authority of human laws, and the natural rights of Man excepted from the grant on which all political authority is founded, is traced as distinctly as words can admit, and the limits to this authority established with as much solemnity as the forms of legislation can express.
The law has the further advantage of having been the result of a formal appeal to the sense of the Community and a deliberate sanction of a vast majority, comprizing every sect of Christians in the State. This act is a true standard of Religious liberty: its principle the great barrier agst usurpations on the rights of conscience. As long as it is respected & no longer, these will be safe. Every provision for them short of this principle, will be found to leave crevices at least thro' which bigotry may introduce persecution; a monster, that feeding & thriving on its own venom, gradually swells to a size and strength overwhelming all laws divine & human....
(you can find the rest of the "Detached Memorandum" here)
"[I]t is proper to take alarm at the first experiment on our liberties....Who does not see that the same authority which
can establish Christianity, in exclusion of all other Religions, may establish with the same ease any particular sect of
Christians, in exclusion of all other Sects? that the same authority which can force a citizen to contribute three pence
only of his property for the support of any one establishment, may force him to conform to any other establishment
in all cases whatsoever?"
-From the "Memorial and Remonstrance," 1785
“The Constitution of the U.S. forbids everything like an establishment of a national religion."
-"Detached Memoranda"
"In the Papal System, Government and Religion are in a manner consolidated, & that is found to be the worst of
Govts. In most of the Govts. of the old world, the legal establishment of a particular religion and without or with
very little toleration of others makes a part of the Political and Civil organization and there are few of the most
enlightened judges who will maintain that the system has been favorable either to Religion or to Govt."
-Letter to Jasper Adams, 1832-1833
Originally posted by DrHoracid
Christian values are being taken away by thieves in black ropes almost daily. Not through the congress as required by the constitution, but by cowards called "judges" that don't have the authority.
Originally posted by intrepid
Originally posted by DrHoracid
Originally posted by intrepid
What about the rest of that post Doc, you know, the part you didn't quote?
Keep missing that for some reason.
One, no seperation ask and answered
Two funding ask and answered
Three ask and answered.
OK, I see I have to get the finger puppets out to point you in the direction you are conveniently missing. Will you answer this? Just once?
Originally posted by intrepid
Originally posted by DrHoracid
The absence of religion in the schools I pay for is a violation of "MY" right of religion. "The congress shall make no law respecting religion"
Removing prayer from the schools is a 'state" support of religion.
Well, if you put it that way, I guess we'll just put everybody's rights on the shelf so you can have yours.
Originally posted by DrHoracid
Again the 'tryany" of the minority is ruining "my" america. The "good" of the one does no outweight the "rights" of the many.
What's that I'm smelling here Doc? Could it be hypocrisy?
You stated two different reasonings here, to whatever suited you at the time. Don't worry though, I've got money on you ignoring this conundrum again.
BTW, when I Googled "school budget cuts" I was wondering why I got 2.7 million hits. Seems funny considering the previous data, don't you think?
I'm home now, so I can concentrate on this.
Originally posted by marg6043
he wants debate on good and evil.
drhoracid
-The US was never founded to be "secular" do some "REAL" history research.
There are a vast number of news stories to that effect
It is "Public" money, it belongs to all the people not just a few anti-religion biggots
They should not be required to HIDE their faith of leave it at the school door.
Public schools are "pushing" tolerance of almost everything[/'quote]
Ah, so because public schools don't let student go out fag bashing or whatnot then they are somehow anti-christian? 'Tolerance' means tolerance for everyone, it not in and of itself anti-christian to expect students to tolerate unchristian behaviour in society and their classmates.
Originally posted by DrHoracid
Again the 'tryany" of the minority is ruining "my" america. The "good" of the one does no outweight the "rights" of the many.
The absence of religion in the schools I pay for is a violation of "MY" right of religion. "The congress shall make no law respecting religion"
Removing prayer from the schools is a 'state" support of religion.
BTW- 06/21/00- Updated 09:51 AM ET, Source: USATODAY/Gallup/CNN poll. Religion in schools. Seventy-one percent of Americans say the Bible should be used in classes. ...
The three major religions Christianity, Judaisim, and even Islam all use the same source for the ten commandments.
[edit on 7-3-2005 by DrHoracid]
Originally posted by DrHoracid
Next, school funding has gone up by trillions of dollars in the last 20 years. There was no funding "cut".
[edit on 7-3-2005 by DrHoracid]
Originally posted by intrepid
I win, I win, I win. You totally ignored my post.
Thanks for showing that you have no position, just hollow words.
You ignored this 3 times, that leads me to believe you're a................... .
Originally posted by DrHoracid
I would think you should work on YOUR comunication skills if you think I ignored your questions. So humor my obviously inept reasoning and restate your questions.
Originally posted by intrepid
Originally posted by DrHoracid
The absence of religion in the schools I pay for is a violation of "MY" right of religion.
Well, if you put it that way, I guess we'll just put everybody's rights on the shelf so you can have yours.
Originally posted by DrHoracid
The "good" of the one does no outweight the "rights" of the many.
What's that I'm smelling here Doc? Could it be hypocrisy?
Originally posted by intrepid
Originally posted by DrHoracid
I would think you should work on YOUR comunication skills if you think I ignored your questions. So humor my obviously inept reasoning and restate your questions.
Once again with the finger puppets. This time I'll edit out the unnecessary words, then maybe you'll get it.
Originally posted by intrepid
Originally posted by DrHoracid
The absence of religion in the schools I pay for is a violation of "MY" right of religion.
Well, if you put it that way, I guess we'll just put everybody's rights on the shelf so you can have yours.
Originally posted by DrHoracid
The "good" of the one does no outweight the "rights" of the many.
What's that I'm smelling here Doc? Could it be hypocrisy?
Do you see the hypocracy of the 2 statement? They are in conflict, it's all about you.
[edit on 9-3-2005 by intrepid]