It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

A reply from Bob Lazar to our analysis of his video footage taken at Area 51

page: 6
34
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 31 2019 @ 05:14 PM
link   
a reply to: A51Watcher

I'll give it an "A" for effort.

I didn't expect someone to analyze that exact jpeg I posted.

I assumed you, or whoever, would use the VHS recording of the original news broadcast, the same one you've used for your analysis. Didn't you say you had that tape?




posted on Nov, 5 2019 @ 04:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: spf33
a reply to: A51Watcher

I'll give it an "A" for effort.



Very magnanimous of you.



I didn't expect someone to analyze that exact jpeg I posted.

I assumed you, or whoever, would use the VHS recording of the original news broadcast, the same one you've used for your analysis. Didn't you say you had that tape?


The tape used for analysis is not the entire broadcast of "UFOs The Best Evidence" so incorrect assumption.



posted on Nov, 5 2019 @ 04:39 PM
link   
A note for readers - A Forensic Image Analyst is not some kid in their moms basement fooling around with photoshop.

To achieve that title they must attain various certifications attesting to their competency in image analysis.

Their analyses and opinion is given serious weight by the court.

They have to provide a full report on what software was used as well as the settings used in said software so that defense attorneys can challenge said analyses if they so choose.

What software can be used for evidence is regulated by the court.

So an analysts evidence and opinion is rarely if ever overturned in court.


Just an FYI so you understand who we are dealing with here.




posted on Nov, 5 2019 @ 10:56 PM
link   
a reply to: A51Watcher

Can you provide a link to the source video you use for your analyses?



posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 12:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: A51Watcher

A note for readers - A Forensic Image Analyst is not some kid in their moms basement fooling around with photoshop.

To achieve that title they must attain various certifications attesting to their competency in image analysis.

Their analyses and opinion is given serious weight by the court.

They have to provide a full report on what software was used as well as the settings used in said software so that defense attorneys can challenge said analyses if they so choose.

What software can be used for evidence is regulated by the court.

So an analysts evidence and opinion is rarely if ever overturned in court.


Just an FYI so you understand who we are dealing with here.





Thanks for the added insight as it lends greater credibility to the analysis presented. We have a lot of Google PHD experts on ATS who love to espouse their cognitive bias after a 10 second boolean search string.



new topics

top topics
 
34
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join