It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Senate votes 100-0 to release Trump whistleblower complaint

page: 5
14
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 04:47 AM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04



Now what will you think if the whistleblower's complaint and the transcripts don't match?

Exactly what everybody will think. That he altered the transcripts. Because that's his reputation. He lies. He cheats and he gets caught at it all the time.
That is what everybody will think. He changed it.
Apparently there are a team of people who listen in to these phone calls and they then get together to create one complete record of the conversations. One may pick up something someone else missed or have a better understanding of what was said. Its not up to just one person. At least that is what I heard tonight from someone who worked in Obamas sit/room and had this job. They are all intelligence agents.
That means there will be more than one person who can attest to what was said. If the transcript reads like a normal conversation that will be good. If it reads like a statement it is not the actual transcript.




posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 04:51 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Hahahahahaha, yes, Trump altered it. Whatever the person who hates Trump says is what happened, even if they never heard the conversation.

Thank you for the laugh.


Apparently there are a team of people who listen in to these phone calls and they then get together to create one complete record of the conversations.


And the whistleblower was not on that team. The whistleblower did not listen in and was not part of it. So what happens then the IC says yep this is the real transcript, not altered, and it doesn't match any wrongdoing the whistleblower talks about. I guess #OrangeManBad forever.



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 04:55 AM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Lets wait to see what that persons role was before we dismiss them since the IG found the complaint credible okay?
Even if they were only filing away paperwork they are an intelligence agent.
This didnt come from the cleaning lady so stop acting like it did.
Its a credible complaint.

There are probably three or four people who were listening in to this phone call and taking notes so that the record could be as complete as possible.
If it was someone on the team collating the notes of the team they would not have to have listened to know what was said. All they needed to do was read the notes of the agents assigned to maintain the record of the call.

No you guys are going with what? A dumpster diver? Give me a break. Just who do you guys think this person is and what do you imagine their capacity within the DNI office is that the fact that they didnt listen in directly means something?
This whole angle about the whistleblowers credibility is not going to fly I hate to tell you and they are going to move ahead pretty quickly on this impeachment inquiry too. Like a brush fire.



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 04:58 AM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

So who is the whistleblower that you dismiss so easily? What is their job?



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 05:04 AM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Yeah I'm sure you do.
What if it was someone in charge of the transcripts of the call? Would they be credible. Remember these are the transcript you are depending on exonerating him with later on today. What if it was somebody who heard him talking to Rudy about what he should do in Kiev?

Admit it you would dismiss anyone who made a claim that trump broke the law even if it was Jesus himself.
Because to you he can do no wrong.



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 05:05 AM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

OH now its someone who hates trump? That's his baby cry all the time... Oh they dont like me.

Wonder of wonders.



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 05:08 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

So who is the whistleblower that you dismiss so easily? What is their job?

How about you answer that. What the outlets who broke the story all say is they never heard the phone call.



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 05:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Yeah I'm sure you do.
What if it was someone in charge of the transcripts of the call? Would they be credible. Remember these are the transcript you are depending on exonerating him with later on today. What if it was somebody who heard him talking to Rudy about what he should do in Kiev?

Admit it you would dismiss anyone who made a claim that trump broke the law even if it was Jesus himself.
Because to you he can do no wrong.

Get me all the people who heard it to come out and say Trump changed it and I will listen. It will never happen, nothing will be changed.



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 06:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Lets wait to see what that persons role was before we dismiss them since the IG found the complaint credible okay?



A senior Trump administration official told Fox News late Tuesday that the administration will release a document showing the intelligence community inspector general found the whistleblower who leveled an explosive accusation against President Trump concerning his talks with Ukraine had “political bias” in favor of “a rival candidate” of the president.

www.foxnews.com...

So what happens if IG found them to have a political bias. I guess that doesn't fit the narrative you have been pushing.



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 08:46 AM
link   
a reply to: ErEhWoN

I disagree, and the REAL story is how Joe Biden and another Democratic Senator used the clout of their positions of power to obstruct an investigation into how Hunter Biden, crack head was paid 50 grand a month, significantly more than the 15 an hour they advocate for everyone else. Deeper is the story of how Hunter Biden recieved 1.5 billion from Chinese officials while Papa Joe was negotiating on behalf of the US. If unable to see the facts, it's because your blind



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 08:51 AM
link   
a reply to: thedigirati

Wow...what a scary couple of prospects. Papa Joe is gone, he just doesn't realize it yet. Sometimes its better to lose as it will lead to winning. Let Warren win and have her day. When she fails to deliver what she promises, she will be returned to the pile of failed socialist that have come before her



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 08:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
they are going to move ahead pretty quickly on this impeachment inquiry too. Like a brush fire.


thats what we're hoping!

they're willing to burn their own house down to try and impeach Trump over a phone call.

If the transcript released shows nothing wrong and all the people around come out and say that's a legitimate record - the democratic charade blows up!

they'll need to impeach on ''obstruction'' and ''stormy payoff''.. which, if anyone's been paying attention, is a total load of %(*@

Didnt you say Trump would be impeached on Russia Collusion?.. or was it Comeys firing, no no no, it was stormy, sorry wrong again it was Trump Jnr Hotel meeting, no wait it wasnt that it was .......



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 08:53 AM
link   
That's the republican lead senate. 100 to zero.
I wouldn't be so sure about them not getting the votes to remove him from office.



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 09:02 AM
link   
the transcript just got released
There's nothing there.

boom



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 09:02 AM
link   
a reply to: ErEhWoN

Uh, Trump wanted it released. The Conservatives voted yes because there's nothing damaging, the liberals voted yes in hopes that there IS something damaging.

Only Reeee I hear is coming from your OP.



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 09:04 AM
link   
a reply to: DanDanDat

Because in his world, everything is done along party lines, therefore he thinks it's the same with the other party.



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 09:06 AM
link   
it mentions crowd-strike and 'the server' and Trump basically asks them to look into rumours that Biden pressured for the prosecutor to be fired.



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 09:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: toysforadults



originally posted by: solve
a reply to: ErEhWoN

Maybe it does not matter who is the president and who gets elected...

Maybe it only matters, that the people are divided.


surprised this didn't get more stars, to many brain dead members now


Look who's talking. This whole thing is just a rumor and your side is using it as an impeachment measure. That's the epitome of brain dead.



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 09:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: solve
a reply to: ErEhWoN

Maybe it does not matter who is the president and who gets elected...

Maybe it only matters, that the people are divided.


More and more I agree with this as they just play one against the other, all the while its business as usual for the true powers that be.



posted on Sep, 25 2019 @ 09:20 AM
link   

originally posted by: ErEhWoN



Maybe it only matters, that the people are divided.
a reply to: solve


But they aren't divided.

38% percent voted John in. That means 62% DIDN'T.


30 states voted Trump in. 20 for Clinton.
2,626 Counties voted Trump in. 487 for Clinton.
304 Electoral Votes put Trump in. 227 for Clinton.

Please learn how elections work. And while you're at it, learn how the popular vote works. Out of 128,838,342 voters, 49% went to Trump. Without CA, Trump wins the popular vote, too.



new topics

top topics



 
14
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join