City of Minneapolis Secretly Legalizes Voter Fraud

originally posted by: Gothmog
Isn't that Ilhan Omar's constituency ?

Yes it is.

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

"A study released the same year by News21, an Arizona State University reporting project, identified a total of 10 cases of alleged voter impersonation in the United States since 2000. The same study found that for every case of voter impersonation, there were 207 cases of other types of election fraud."

Every study has shown voter fraud IS NOT A PROBLEM.

However, voter suppression prevents millions of Democrats from voting.

a reply to: dfnj2015

The California vote harvesting is still being investigated 😎

I'm in no way defending "vouching," but thought I'd share what I found concerning this topic. In 2012, this article gave a reason for the need for vouching:

In any given election there are thousands of voters who are living in new or temporary addresses. There are thousands of voters who have no address because they are in shelters or on the street. And then there are thousands that live in nursing homes or other group homes. It’s estimated that 200,000 or more of these people currently have no valid photo ID. Many seniors for instance have let their drivers licenses expire because they no longer drive. Many people living in group homes of various types can’t drive in any event. Many college students from other states and other MN towns don’t have current state issued photo IDs. Of course it goes without saying that homeless people don’t have valid IDs with a current address on them. These are all people who are constitutionally guaranteed a right to vote, and who are currently voting. The way we currently accommodate these voters is to allow another registered voter to vouch for them. A registered voter can vouch for up to 15 people. Why 15 people? This is NOT about driving around a van and shuttling voters from one polling place to the next. Minnesota law currently licenses residential facilities i.e. group homes for developmentally disabled, mentally ill, battered women, chemical dependency, etc. to house 15 residents in most cases. The vouching system was set up so these people could be taken to the polling place by resident staff and cast their vote. A voucher testifies that you know this person, they are who they way they are, and they currently live in the precinct where they are voting. When you vouch for someone you basically sign an affidavit, it’s perjury to lie on an affidavit and in MN this is a felony offense.

While one can imagine bus loads illegal voters, the truth is that this vouching allows thousands of MN’s the chance to exercise their constitutional right to vote. Eliminating vouching won’t disenfranchise all of those voters, but it will disenfranchise some of them.

www.minnpost.com...

Personally, I say go ahead and "disenfranchise" some of these voters. IMO, there's just too big of a risk for voter fraud to take place. If you don't have a VALID ID...YOU SHOULD NOT BE ABLE TO VOTE.

a reply to: shawmanfromny

How else did that gargantuan bag of crap get elected?

a reply to: dfnj2015

Atch---BS---chuuuu...

Up to 5.7 million non-citizens could have voted in Obama's 2008 election.

Study supports Trump: 5.7 million noncitizens may have cast illegal votes

This was before democrats/liberals implemented laws that are now allowing illegals to get driver licenses and are being automatically selected to vote...

Only RACIST liberals/democrats claim that LEGAL minorities can't get a driver's license and can't subscribe to vote...

a reply to: shawmanfromny

Those are only excuses to allow voter fraud, plain and simple.

Watch and inform yourself contrary to what the criminal democrats/liberals keep claiming...



Watch it all please.

a reply to: Asktheanimals

We can only hope.

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
Is this real life?

Welcome to our not-so-soft civil war.

Welcome to the communist revolution in the US. These people mean business. Omar is part of it.

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
Is this real life?

Welcome to our not-so-soft civil war.

Double post.
The communists have not given up. But they will not prevail.

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Meh, minnesota was the only blue state in the 1984 election. Trump wasn't going to win that anyway.

However, this raises a few important questions:
1) At what point do state/local governments have to respect federal election laws?
2) Why is it so difficult to get voter ID through?
3) What is the point of elections if a few more state's hop on board with this?

The third point is the scariest. Once that thought becomes the mainstream, our government ceases to function. If we can't trust our elections, why would we follow the laws created by those legislators and executives we "elect?" Why would we believe the interpretations of the people appointed by these illegitimate elected officials.

Okay. So if we know vouches won't be abused and used for fraud it's a great idea and extends the right of voting to those who would otherwise be disenfranchised.

If it is so safe and protected against fraud, then the same system can be used to expand people's right to own a gun. You can walk into a gun shop and buy a gun for up to eight different people who can not physically be there or do not have the necessary paperwork due to the same reasons they wouldn't be able to vote.

Those who support a voting vouching system should obviously support such a system.

a reply to: GenerationGap

...and don't forget that requiring a person to show their ID to purchase a firearm is suppression of the 2nd amendment and is racist.

Secondly as for the voter voucher system, ballot harvesting. no photo id, rank preference voting and the lefts push to allow non citizens to vote goes hand in hand with the lefts attempt to backdoor an illegal and unconstitutional national popular vote by having states award their electoral college votes to the person who wins the nonexistent national popular vote.

The left wants to re-litigate everything... Sadly for them a second civil war will also end in their defeat, just as the 1st one did.

Anyone have an idea where the next America might be?

a reply to: Tempter

It will still be there after the Civil War, just less a few nutters.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

F Minneapolis and F Minnesota

Even a liberal Judge will throw this out. Voting for people is not going to make it to voting day as an official position. They will still cheat but lets not allow a stamp of approval for any person to vote for another, EVER.

a reply to: Lumenari

The best thing republicans or a red state do for the right IS to do this EXACT same thing. Then cnn etal will have no choice but to cover all of them when brought up.

Do Werewolf votes count ?

Is it Minnesota they call little Somalia now?

a reply to: ElectricUniverse


Umm, no. Ya'll BADLY misread that. A voucher cannot vote for someone else. They can only vouch for the other person's identity, up to a maximum of 8 other voters. And none of those being vouched for can vouch for another person.