It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Hillary Clinton: Anyone other than Trump would have been indicted for obstruction

page: 2
46
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 23 2019 @ 05:05 PM
link   
a reply to: mobiusmale

Seriously? Hillary Clinton blows off its piehole accusing anyone of a crime? Please trump, please, bring the pain!

Cheers - Dave




posted on Apr, 23 2019 @ 05:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: network dude

I will agree that Hillary should be taken to court and be tried by a jury of her peers.

If the evidence is sound and shows that she committed a crime. Then jail her ass immediately.

Fair?


fair. But again, this one sided justice system MUST GO. I don't give a rats ass who breaks the law, only that those who do, are dealt with the same. Even if you are a rich democrat, or a homosexual, or black, or all of the above.

Equal justice for all, or shove your justice up your backside.



posted on Apr, 23 2019 @ 05:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: watchitburn
Can't she just die already?


Serendipity. I saw this just before I read your post. I thought it was pretty good and I was tempted to give it its own thread.




posted on Apr, 23 2019 @ 05:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: mobiusmaleShe's a brave one, if not a future felon...



Hillary has balls, that’s for sure.

Oh sorry, my mistake, that was Michelle.
It’s Michelle Obama that has the balls.

Sorry, won’t happen again.

Oh wait, it’s Michael that has the balls.
That’s right, it’s First Lady Michael Obama that has balls.



posted on Apr, 23 2019 @ 05:21 PM
link   
a reply to: VictorVonDoom

Loved it, thanks for sharing...........is that his real hair?



posted on Apr, 23 2019 @ 05:21 PM
link   
And a few have been indicted for less than her when it comes to mishandling classified material..



posted on Apr, 23 2019 @ 05:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: jhn7537
a reply to: mobiusmale

This broad really has some nerve... I would guess this move is being made in efforts to put press out there in the event she comes under fire over the Russia hoax falling apart - which i believe is a possible scenario that could happen soon... Once the heat turns up on her, she will say "this is only happening due to the way i spoke about trump "..... i can see it now. She will claim Trump is jailing people with opposing views (or who claimed Impeach Trump!). Like its retaliation or something.


She is too senile these days to think that way, hell she doesn't even carry tabasco sauce in her purse anymore unless she is told to.



posted on Apr, 23 2019 @ 05:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: mobiusmale

I think the only people that still believe in Hillary are 3 lesbians who own a stall at the local mall that sell purses that are tie-dyed.



jesus, the 60's called and they want their homophobia back.....



posted on Apr, 23 2019 @ 05:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: jimmyx

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: mobiusmale

I think the only people that still believe in Hillary are 3 lesbians who own a stall at the local mall that sell purses that are tie-dyed.



jesus, the 60's called and they want their homophobia back.....


Oversensitive much? You poor thing.



posted on Apr, 23 2019 @ 05:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: Bluntone22

No no.

It is hypocritical to claim that you care about one politician doing something wrong. But then when your team does it they get a pass.

Hillary should of gone to jail or been fined for having that server. I agree with that.

We need to also need to agree that what Trumps team has done is wrong and there needs to be an investigation.

Otherwise Republicans have no credibility.



What a load of crap
When one team breaks a rule and nothing happens that means both teams get to break the rule.

Standards have been set,,, or lack of standards



posted on Apr, 23 2019 @ 06:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Tartuffe

Presidential Records Act

en.wikipedia.org...

Is a non criminal act. But still a law.

In addition to what you said. Communications must be stored no more than 20 days after they are sent. ie forward a copy of what was sent for records keeping.

Sounds like Trumps staff broke the law.



posted on Apr, 23 2019 @ 06:02 PM
link   
a reply to: network dude

We can agree on that.

The people in office work for us. Not the other way around.

Everyone in Washington D.C. needs to be held accountable. And if they have broken a law they need to investigated.

Both Hillary and Trump.



posted on Apr, 23 2019 @ 06:10 PM
link   
a reply to: Bluntone22

The standard should be that if a government official breaks the law then that government official needs to be tried in court.

If your party has been clamoring for years to send someone to jail for x reason. And then your person on your team does something similar. And you want to give him a pass... because the other guy did it.

Well that's just hypocrisy.

And I can't take your team seriously anymore.
edit on 23-4-2019 by grey580 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 23 2019 @ 06:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: Tartuffe

Presidential Records Act

en.wikipedia.org...

Is a non criminal act. But still a law.

In addition to what you said. Communications must be stored no more than 20 days after they are sent. ie forward a copy of what was sent for records keeping.

Sounds like Trumps staff broke the law.


That's why, according to Kushner's lawyer, Kushner took screenshots and forwarded them to his Whitehouse account and the National security council.

Sounds like he didn't break the law after all.



posted on Apr, 23 2019 @ 06:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: jimmyx

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: mobiusmale

I think the only people that still believe in Hillary are 3 lesbians who own a stall at the local mall that sell purses that are tie-dyed.



jesus, the 60's called and they want their homophobia back.....


Sorry.

Didn't mean to offend you.

I meant non-binary gender fluid organic carbon-based bipeds.

Here, have a kitten.



posted on Apr, 23 2019 @ 06:13 PM
link   
a reply to: mobiusmale

This is worthy of repeating/posting?




posted on Apr, 23 2019 @ 06:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: jimmyx

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: mobiusmale

I think the only people that still believe in Hillary are 3 lesbians who own a stall at the local mall that sell purses that are tie-dyed.



jesus, the 60's called and they want their homophobia back.....


Sorry.

Didn't mean to offend you.

I meant non-binary gender fluid organic carbon-based bipeds.

Here, have a kitten.


No thanks, they have hardly any meat and upsets my stomach. Leptospirosis, I suppose.




posted on Apr, 23 2019 @ 06:19 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut




posted on Apr, 23 2019 @ 06:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: chr0naut




Still not sure what tune you are trying to sing.

Can you hum a few more bars?




posted on Apr, 23 2019 @ 06:53 PM
link   
a reply to: grey580
Republicans don’t have any credibility. Once I’ve been lied to a few times I start to believe everything put forth after that is a lie . You must be new here .
They’re as credible as the democrats , which is not at all



new topics

top topics



 
46
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join