It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

US Navy Patents Anti Gravity - B64G1/409 Unconventional Spacecraft Propulsion Systems

page: 1
16
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 17 2019 @ 11:52 PM
link   
Well this is very interesting: Craft Using An Inertial Mass Reduction Device

Under the classification: B64G1/409 Unconventional Spacecraft Propulsion Systems


ABSTRACT:

A craft using an inertial mass reduction device comprises of an inner resonant cavity wall , an outer resonant cavity , and microwave emitters . The electrically charged outer resonant cavity wall and the electrically insulated inner resonant cavity wall form a resonant cavity . The microwave emitters create high frequency electromagnetic waves throughout the resonant cavity causing the resonant cavity to vibrate in an accelerated mode and create a local polarized vacuum outside the outer resonant cavity wall.

TR3B ???


The Levitating Frog for a visual reference. I'm not comparing anything other than the apparent use of electromagnetism.

A frog is levitated using a 10 tesla magnetic coil using diamagnetism



edit on 17-4-2019 by 1point92AU because: (no reason given)




posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 12:02 AM
link   
a reply to: 1point92AU

Can you please with icing on top break this down for me? Sounds SUPER fascinating but I am not educated in this manner to understand this.



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 12:43 AM
link   
This could revolutionize hoverboards, provided they can fix that whole "may explode at any moment" problem.

Seriously though... very cool, if it is real. S&F



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 12:51 AM
link   
a reply to: 1point92AU

Way cool!: Hopefully, this tech sees the light of day in the consumer sector.



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 12:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: 1point92AU
TR3B ???
That patent has nothing to do with the TR3B.

Someone has alleged this patent is related to the TR3B....
US20060145019A1 - Triangular spacecraft

but...
Edgar Fouche’s TR-3B is most likely a hoax


There is no doubt that Fouche himself was also a fraud and played to the gullibility and naivete of his audience.


a reply to: Allaroundyou
1point92AU has no clue and neither does anybody else. You can file for a patent for a mass reduction device but there's no requirement that such a thing is even possible. The only thing the US patent office won't issue patents for are perpetual motion machines. But mass reduction devices and other non-existent technology is fair game, they will issue patents for those and don't require any working model to do so. Nobody has reliably demonstrated any mass-reduction technology, so the patent is likely useless, and there are many other useless patents where the claims for the devices are beyond any scientific proof.



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 01:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: lostbook
a reply to: 1point92AU

Way cool!: Hopefully, this tech sees the light of day in the consumer sector.


Doubtful as the patent states this:

STATEMENT OF GOVERNMENT INTEREST
The invention described herein may be manufactured and used by or for the Government of the United States of America for governmental purposes without payment of any royalties thereon or therefor.

edit on 18-4-2019 by 1point92AU because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 01:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: Arbitrageur

originally posted by: 1point92AU
TR3B ???
That patent has nothing to do with the TR3B.

Someone has alleged this patent is related to the TR3B....
US20060145019A1 - Triangular spacecraft

but...
Edgar Fouche’s TR-3B is most likely a hoax


There is no doubt that Fouche himself was also a fraud and played to the gullibility and naivete of his audience.


a reply to: Allaroundyou
1point92AU has no clue and neither does anybody else. You can file for a patent for a mass reduction device but there's no requirement that such a thing is even possible. The only thing the US patent office won't issue patents for are perpetual motion machines. But mass reduction devices and other non-existent technology is fair game, they will issue patents for those and don't require any working model to do so. Nobody has reliably demonstrated any mass-reduction technology, so the patent is likely useless, and there are many other useless patents where the claims for the devices are beyond any scientific proof.


The first of the "experts" shows up with their absolute claims of how it's impossible for advanced technology to exist yet cannot offer a reasonable counter argument other than "because it doesn't".


edit on 18-4-2019 by 1point92AU because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 01:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: 1point92AU

Can you please with icing on top break this down for me? Sounds SUPER fascinating but I am not educated in this manner to understand this.



Just read through the patent. You can download the PDF and read it in its entirety from the link I provided in the OP.



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 02:36 AM
link   
a reply to: 1point92AU

This would work to levitate a craft, but good grief the "pilots" in the 'crew compartment' would be done like that frog and how would you direct it forward and back? That's just using earth's magnetic field more or less, would be kind of like getting behind the wheel of a automobile blindfolded.

Microwave emitters doesn't work well with the human body....I'd like to know how to guide the thing.



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 02:57 AM
link   

Everything that surrounds us, ourselves included, can be described as macroscopic collections of fluctuations, vibrations, and oscillations in quantum mechanical fields. Matter is confined energy, bound within fields, frozen in a quantum of time. Therefore, under certain conditions (such as the coupling of hyper-frequency axial spin with hyper-frequency vibrations of electrically charged systems) the rules and special effects of quantum field behavior also apply to macroscopic physical entities (macroscopic quantum phenomena).



It is possible to reduce the inertial mass and hence the gravitational mass, of a system/object in motion, by an abrupt perturbation of the non-linear background of local spacetime (the local vacuum energy state), equivalent to an accelerated excursion far from thermodynamic equilibrium (analogous with symmetry-breaking induced by abrupt changes of state/phase transitions). The physical mechanism which drives this diminution in inertial mass is based on the negative pressure (hence repulsive gravity) exhibited by the polarized local vacuum energy state (local vacuum polarization being achieved by a coupling of accelerated high frequency vibration with accelerated high frequency axial rotation of an electrically charged system/object) in the close proximity of the system/object in question. In other words, inertial mass reduction can be achieved via manipulation of quantum field fluctuations in the local vacuum energy state, in the immediate proximity of the object/system. Therefore it is possible to reduce a craft's inertia, that is, its resistance to motion.




edit on 4/18/2019 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 03:04 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Well I'm glad you would be in the crafts (T.O.D.) transmission operation department LOL



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 03:18 AM
link   
a reply to: ArchangelOger

I wonder which one would be faster.


The gravitomagnetic field, propagated outward, orthogonally to the walls of the hollow superconductive shield, forms a pressure anomaly of inflationary vacuum state in the area of propagation. The pressure anomaly of inflationary vacuum state is comprised of an area of relatively lower vacuum pressure density in front of the space vehicle and an area of relatively higher vacuum pressure density behind the vehicle.

The difference in the vacuum pressure density propels the space vehicle of this invention forward.

patentimages.storage.googleapis.com...

edit on 4/18/2019 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 03:19 AM
link   
a reply to: Arbitrageur

So why then would the US Navy expend the time, and associated expense in seeking such a patent?



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 03:26 AM
link   
a reply to: pseudoless

The US Navy is the assignee, that does not mean the Navy had anything to do with it. Anyone can assign their patent to anyone they wish, or as could be the case here, Pais is in the Navy (or is a contractor of some sort) and therefore is required to assign the patent to the government.


Assignees don't create a unique invention or design. They also don't go through the lengthy patent process. They simply assume exclusive rights to intellectual property.
www.upcounsel.com...


There is no requirement that an invention be demonstrated to work in order to obtain a patent.

Pais’ other patent applications feature descriptions for an “inertial mass reduction device” and a “high-frequency gravitational wave generator” for driving spaceships without conventional fuels. If effective, his three proposed inventions could make possible the development of devices currently limited to the realm of science fiction and transform the modern world. Given the lack of evidence to support these proposals, however, they seem unlikely to come to fruition.
eandt.theiet.org...

edit on 4/18/2019 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 03:36 AM
link   
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Posted a while ago.
Patents mean nothing and when the subject matter incorporates multiple emerging theories- it is nigh on impossible to tell if a well educated author is being "breakthrough"- or simply indulging in scientific edge-lordery.

Found it interesting they were using their own acronym for the proposed output - a "HAUC -Hybrid Aerial Underwater Craft" when several alternatives already exist in the military domain.



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 03:45 AM
link   
I read the Patent Application. It is merely an "Application" under pending review, a patent has not been granted. It describes its operation in ambiguous and obfuscatory language. Tesla used to write his descriptions of his devices in the same type of intentionally flowery, ambiguous, and confusing English. If you knew how his devices worked, then you could see the verbiage described them fairly well. If you did not know how the devices worked, you would never, ever guess how they worked (he got burned by Edison/Marconi/JP Morgan/et al, many times).
I think the Navy bought this guy out, and is using his application to cover itself, in case parts of it actually work.
I was hoping somebody made a big leap, or was leaking something. I did not learn anything new, nor see any concrete revelations in the Patent Application's nebulous claims. But If the Navy paid money for this, then somebody has.

P.S.; Where is the working model?



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 03:48 AM
link   
a reply to: EHowardHuntClub

Actually, the patent was granted. 10,144,532.


But If the Navy paid money for this, then somebody has.
If he's in the Navy, he was paid his salary.


P.S.; Where is the working model?
Not required.
edit on 4/18/2019 by Phage because: (no reason given)

edit on 4/18/2019 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 03:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: madmac5150
This could revolutionize hoverboards, provided they can fix that whole "may explode at any moment" problem.

Seriously though... very cool, if it is real. S&F


Victor Grebennikov solved the hoverboard issue long ago.www.youtube.com...



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 04:00 AM
link   
a reply to: one4all

Bug wings?



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 05:12 AM
link   
a reply to: Arbitrageur




The only thing the US patent office won't issue patents for are perpetual motion machines. But mass reduction devices and other non-existent technology is fair game, they will issue patents for those and don't require any working model to do so


Seems like quite a contradictory and odd policy the US patent office has.




top topics



 
16
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join