Senate committee finds no russian collusion

a reply to: carewemust

The bottom you say?
Will Bottom?

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Bluntone22

the Senate Intelligence Committee is approaching the end of its investigation into the 2016 election, having uncovered no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia

no evidence
interesting
wonder if it will be accepted?

Not likely.

The leftist loons will start take bites out of Mueller.

Adam Schiff has already complained that Mueller wasn't thorough enough

Told ya so

a reply to: Erno86

The point is, the people who are on the intelligence committees (both House & Senate) don't know of any contacts between Trump or his people and Russia that would prove collusion. And remember, roughly half the people on those committees are Trump's political enemies and would not hide such information. This means we can be reasonably certain that the US intelligence community knows of no such contacts.

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
a reply to: Erno86

The point is, the people who are on the intelligence committees (both House & Senate) don't know of any contacts between Trump or his people and Russia that would prove collusion. And remember, roughly half the people on those committees are Trump's political enemies and would not hide such information. This means we can be reasonably certain that the US intelligence community knows of no such contacts.

It seems that for some, it's a hard pill to swallow.

Welcome to the Bullsh!t reality of politics numbnuts!

Looks like the Dog and Pony charade is finally over. Mueller and company must have finally shredded any and all evidence into all crimes from previous elected officials.

Outcome: No one will be jailed for feats such as (Benzaghi), no rather the tax payers paid for one of the most expensive scrubs ever accomplished!

End Result: Tax payer lost

End Quote:

So they have finally cleared Hilary of collusion?

I thought that Uranium One deal was a slam dunk.

a reply to: Bluntone22

What about the FBI and the CIA? The GOP led senate is not a true reflection of the facts. Sorry. May as well be Devin Nunes.

originally posted by: Bluntone22
Senate has uncovered no direct evidence of conspiracy between Trump campaign and Russia

Well there ya have it..
How much wasted money there....

"WASHINGTON — After two years and 200 interviews, the Senate Intelligence Committee is approaching the end of its investigation into the 2016 election, having uncovered no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to both Democrats and Republicans on the committee."

www.google.com...

Interesting to see how many will dismiss this.

Who has oversight of the DOJ?

Again not exctly the exoneration you are claiming it to be. LOL.

But investigators disagree along party lines when it comes to the implications of a pattern of contacts they have documented between Trump associates and Russians — contacts that occurred before, during and after Russian intelligence operatives were seeking to help Donald Trump by leaking hacked Democratic emails and attacking his opponent, Hillary Clinton, on social media.

Sen. Mark Warner, D.-Va., ranking member of the committee, told reporters in the Capitol Tuesday that he disagrees with the way Burr characterized the evidence about collusion, but he declined to offer his own assessment. "I'm not going to get into any conclusions I have," he said, before adding that "there's never been a campaign in American history ... that people affiliated with the campaign had as many ties with Russia as the Trump campaign did."

]

Mueller has people in jail and others are waiting to go to jail for lying about their contacts with the Russians who were working to get trump elected.

no evidence

"If we write a report based upon the facts that we have, then we don't have anything that would suggest there was collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia," Burr told CBS.

bipartisan including one of those virginia democrats

Burr also described an environment of bipartisanship within the committee, which he oversees with Vice Chair Mark Warner (D-Va.). Burr told CBS he found it difficult to believe the committee would splinter along partisan lines, as was the case in the House Intelligence Committee's Russia investigation, which was shuttered by its then-GOP majority last year.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
Again not exctly the exoneration you are claiming it to be. LOL.

But investigators disagree along party lines when it comes to the implications of a pattern of contacts they have documented between Trump associates and Russians — contacts that occurred before, during and after Russian intelligence operatives were seeking to help Donald Trump by leaking hacked Democratic emails and attacking his opponent, Hillary Clinton, on social media.

So now they're calling WikiLeaks "Russian operatives"?

originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: Bluntone22

What about the conspiring between the Clinton campaign and the media, Russians, FBI, doj, intelligence community, UK intelligence, Australian diplomats...?

No investigations by the Trump admin have brought any charges or evidence forth. The politicians have all investigated themselves and they all agree that they are all innocent. On all sides.

Cases closed.

originally posted by: carewemust
Adam Schiff says the Trump family colluded with Saudi Arabia and douche bank to commit multiple crimes, and he's going to get to the bottom of it!

I think he is a reincarnated Joseph McCarthy... Scary for both parties...

So just a few days ago it has come to light that old Adam has had past relationships with Fusion GPS. Ya that one...Seems Adam was one of the biggest voices for Sessions' recusal from just one meeting as an official senator with Russia, so now that Adam's been caught hobnobbing with Fusion GPS should he do the same?

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
a reply to: Erno86

The point is, the people who are on the intelligence committees (both House & Senate) don't know of any contacts between Trump or his people and Russia that would prove collusion. And remember, roughly half the people on those committees are Trump's political enemies and would not hide such information. This means we can be reasonably certain that the US intelligence community knows of no such contacts.

You do know that the minority gets no say in the reports or conclusions if the majority suppresses them...

GOP has had control of the committee investigation from day one.

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

originally posted by: Sillyolme
Again not exctly the exoneration you are claiming it to be. LOL.

But investigators disagree along party lines when it comes to the implications of a pattern of contacts they have documented between Trump associates and Russians — contacts that occurred before, during and after Russian intelligence operatives were seeking to help Donald Trump by leaking hacked Democratic emails and attacking his opponent, Hillary Clinton, on social media.

So now they're calling WikiLeaks "Russian operatives"?

Where have you been? People have been saying that since Assange went on to have a show with RT years ago.

funny. Republicans talking about wasting money..caugh ..Benghazi...caugh

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
a reply to: Bluntone22


What a massive f#cking waste of money.

Anyone with half a brain could have predicted this outcome two years ago.

Some of the "smartest" people I know bought into this Russia BS.

If I were that way inclined I would gloat about "I told you so" but honestly, I just feel sick thinking about it.

I don't blame them, I blame the MSM propaganda.

The left was damned and determined and now they look RIDICULOUS and made those smart people hopefully even more intelligent. How could you trust any of their bullchite, lol at least with Trump its obvious when he is full of crap. Which now means the lefts only option is to double down continue the investigations and hope the public is just weary of it all
come election time. But they have no answers or magic plans, beyond orange man bad LOL. So sick of hearing that tell me what you are going to do thats different, so everybody can make an intelligent decision on who might not screw it up the least. Personally think its Tulsi, but Trump just might have enough juice to win against a battle weary DNC candidate.

Both the House and the Senate find no collusion.
Mueller will announce the same in his report.

Democrats will cry and launch new investigations, instead of apologising to the people and asking for forgiveness.

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

originally posted by: Sillyolme
Again not exctly the exoneration you are claiming it to be. LOL.

But investigators disagree along party lines when it comes to the implications of a pattern of contacts they have documented between Trump associates and Russians — contacts that occurred before, during and after Russian intelligence operatives were seeking to help Donald Trump by leaking hacked Democratic emails and attacking his opponent, Hillary Clinton, on social media.

So now they're calling WikiLeaks "Russian operatives"?

Where have you been? People have been saying that since Assange went on to have a show with RT years ago.

They would be the idiot people saying that.
Larry King has a show on RT. Is he a Russian spy too?