It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Indigo_Child
It's a man-made structure, and if it is dated 10,000 years ago, it's within the time-frame when a very advanced civilization existed on this planet, the Vedic civilization(during the Rama empire) and it's likely it was a remenant of this civilization. However, it could have been another civilization other than Rama. I just don't know about any others, but as Pyramids are not vedic architecture, it's likely it was another civilization.
It does not matter what anyone tells you, because if they tell you it is natural, there is something wrong with their education. I have already proven that this civilization existed in my other threads. However, I do get a feeling I've wasted my time and nobody really cares for the truth.
[edit on 27-2-2005 by Indigo_Child]
Originally posted by Indigo_Child
It does not matter what anyone tells you, because if they tell you it is natural, there is something wrong with their education. I have already proven that this civilization existed in my other threads. However, I do get a feeling I've wasted my time and nobody really cares for the truth.
Originally posted by IKnowNothing
I remember watching a show about this particular topic. If my memory serves my right, I believe they found carvings of figures in an area they called the 'theatre'. I believe the show was on national geographic or discovery civilization. I'll try to find it.
Originally posted by mythatsabigprobe
I wouldn't rush to say this is a man-made structure though, it doesn't seem to have any man-made qualities and there's a lot about it that says it's natural. The 'stairs' that look so impressive are all irregular heights and most are way too large for a human to use - most also lead nowhere.
Originally posted by skychief
From the pictures, these formations look like they have definitely been worked on by man. I know that the whole region is very dynamic due to volcanic and seismic activity but I doubt some of the more compelling formations could have been caused by "natural" causes. It makes you wonder though, how fast these formations were swallowed up by the sea. Was it a gradual process that took hundreds, if not thousands, of years or was it rather quick? If the latter, is this why we don't find any other similar structures nearby in coastal areas. It also makes you wonder if we should not be studying nearby, submerged, coastal areas around the globe, more closely, looking for signs of ancient civilizations. For example, after the tsunami in Indonesia, artifacts from an ancient port city in India were unearthed.
www.abovetopsecret.com...'
Originally posted by Sugarlump
These ruins are fascinating... I for one don't believe for a second that nature created the ruins. As to what did I don't even want to speculate because I don't know enough to do anything other than muddy the waters.
Originally posted by rwatkins
I think if it was built by a more advanced race or aliens, there would be more complex structures. The Yonaguni site only has simple construction.