It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Ksihkehe
Trying to manipulate an online meaningless poll...
TREASON, CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS, WWIII, TO THE GALLOWS!
originally posted by: Christosterone
Can any liberal answer this one question...
How did the Russians [or a website poll] cause my wife and I to vote for trump?
-Chris
originally posted by: Extorris
originally posted by: Ksihkehe
Trying to manipulate an online meaningless poll...
TREASON, CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS, WWIII, TO THE GALLOWS!
Not really.
Just one more drip of pathetic fail.
Sure, it would be a huge scandal for any President with even a crumb of integrity or credibility left with the public, but now the steady parade of desperate stupid is just good for chuckles.
My advice is for the Right Wing to keep defending him ferociously. Chain yourselves to this ship.
Trust me, the echo chamber bubble here wont pop!
DONALD TRUMP APPROVAL RATING AVERAGE IN FIRST TWO YEARS IS LOWEST FOR ANY PRESIDENT SINCE WORLD WAR II
www.newsweek.com...
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: Mahogany
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Mahogany
In hindsight, was that the only poll that was accurate?
Maybe.
The article says they failed to influence them, even after the attempts, so it remains that it could have been accurate.
An attempt is still conspiracy to commit a crime.
Remember the polls showing Clinton favored to win 97% to Trump's 3% chance?
originally posted by: Extorris
originally posted by: Ksihkehe
Trying to manipulate an online meaningless poll...
TREASON, CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS, WWIII, TO THE GALLOWS!
Not really.
Just one more drip of pathetic fail.
Sure, it would be a huge scandal for any President with even a crumb of integrity or credibility left with the public, but now the steady parade of desperate stupid is just good for chuckles.
My advice is for the Right Wing to keep defending him ferociously. Chain yourselves to this ship.
Trust me, the echo chamber bubble here wont pop!
DONALD TRUMP APPROVAL RATING AVERAGE IN FIRST TWO YEARS IS LOWEST FOR ANY PRESIDENT SINCE WORLD WAR II
www.newsweek.com...
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Arnie123
So in other words, No.
originally posted by: Mahogany
originally posted by: jjkenobi
Cohen also asked Gauger to create a Twitter account with the handle @WomenForCohen that would be run by a female friend of Gauger's to portray Cohen as a "sex symbol" and hype his statements in favor of Trump's presidential campaign, the Journal reported.
"Women who love and support Michael Cohen. Strong, pit bull, sex symbol, no nonsense, business oriented, and ready to make a difference!" reads the account profile. The profile was created in May 2016 and remains active with just 527 followers as of Thursday morning.
This dude is a real winner. Does he have any evidence that Trump asked him to do these things?
www.usatoday.com...
No. The Special Counsel does... they raided Cohen's office and took all the evidence. It's in the article.
Cohen is a liar, why should we suddenly believe him? Oh, because Orange Man Bad?
Don't buy it.
Evidence.
Testimony alone doesn't convict.
originally posted by: jhn7537
a reply to: Mahogany
I wonder what's worse, rigging a CNBC poll or rigging the DNC primaries???
Anyone have a thought?
originally posted by: Sillyolme
LOOK These guys obviously cheated right from the start. Before they even got on that escalator they were already cheating.
The most disgusting president ever... complete slime.
originally posted by: Justoneman
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Arnie123
So in other words, No.
originally posted by: Mahogany
originally posted by: jjkenobi
Cohen also asked Gauger to create a Twitter account with the handle @WomenForCohen that would be run by a female friend of Gauger's to portray Cohen as a "sex symbol" and hype his statements in favor of Trump's presidential campaign, the Journal reported.
"Women who love and support Michael Cohen. Strong, pit bull, sex symbol, no nonsense, business oriented, and ready to make a difference!" reads the account profile. The profile was created in May 2016 and remains active with just 527 followers as of Thursday morning.
This dude is a real winner. Does he have any evidence that Trump asked him to do these things?
www.usatoday.com...
No. The Special Counsel does... they raided Cohen's office and took all the evidence. It's in the article.
Cohen is a liar, why should we suddenly believe him? Oh, because Orange Man Bad?
Don't buy it.
Evidence.
Testimony alone doesn't convict.
You mean testimony where he got in trouble for lying doesn't count in YOUR opinion. The majority of the rest of the planet will most certainly disagree with YOUR opinion if that is what it is.
originally posted by: SouthernForkway26
Wow, some people need to step back and use some common sense.
The article said this was before his campaign. Before he went up against 19 Republicans or even knew who they were.
Before downing Hillary. Before the whole crazy 2016 campaign. To think a pre-campaign internet poll influenced even a single vote is lunacy.
He probably used the poll to impress Melania or friends or something.
It's nowhere near a criminal offense.
It won’t change one thing in the deplorable camp. Their minds are like a steel trap when it comes to their support for trump.
His support is eroding in the middle. And this will help continent his decline among them. I think the Democrats could run Clint Eastwoods’ empty chair in 2020 and beat trump at the rate he’s going.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Justoneman
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Arnie123
So in other words, No.
originally posted by: Mahogany
originally posted by: jjkenobi
Cohen also asked Gauger to create a Twitter account with the handle @WomenForCohen that would be run by a female friend of Gauger's to portray Cohen as a "sex symbol" and hype his statements in favor of Trump's presidential campaign, the Journal reported.
"Women who love and support Michael Cohen. Strong, pit bull, sex symbol, no nonsense, business oriented, and ready to make a difference!" reads the account profile. The profile was created in May 2016 and remains active with just 527 followers as of Thursday morning.
This dude is a real winner. Does he have any evidence that Trump asked him to do these things?
www.usatoday.com...
No. The Special Counsel does... they raided Cohen's office and took all the evidence. It's in the article.
Cohen is a liar, why should we suddenly believe him? Oh, because Orange Man Bad?
Don't buy it.
Evidence.
Testimony alone doesn't convict.
You mean testimony where he got in trouble for lying doesn't count in YOUR opinion. The majority of the rest of the planet will most certainly disagree with YOUR opinion if that is what it is.
They raided Cohen's office and retrieved evidence.
Where the evidence does not support the testimony, or the testimony doesn't support the evidence, there is doubt. Where the evidence supports the testimony, you have grounds to convict.
What you hear on the media, is just talk and could be lies, no matter who says it and which 'side' it favors.
If what is said is supported by evidence, then it is highly likely to be the truth, especially if there is no contradictory evidence.
Cohen is spilling the beans now, because what he said previously was contradicted by the evidence that the prosecution has gathered.
Just because it is on Fox News, does not mean that it will stand up in court where the criterion for determining truth is tougher.
originally posted by: Mahogany
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Mahogany
In hindsight, was that the only poll that was accurate?
Maybe.
The article says they failed to influence them, even after the attempts, so it remains that it could have been accurate.
An attempt is still conspiracy to commit a crime.
originally posted by: soundguy
originally posted by: SouthernForkway26
Wow, some people need to step back and use some common sense.
The article said this was before his campaign. Before he went up against 19 Republicans or even knew who they were.
Before downing Hillary. Before the whole crazy 2016 campaign. To think a pre-campaign internet poll influenced even a single vote is lunacy.
He probably used the poll to impress Melania or friends or something.
It's nowhere near a criminal offense.
It’s called manipulating the news cycle. Those news folks like to run stories about people surging in the polls. The thing I find humorous about this entire thing is. He was telling the deplorables right to their faces that the polls are rigged. I was able to understand exactly what he meant. And as it turns out, I was right.
originally posted by: Justoneman
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Justoneman
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Arnie123
So in other words, No.
originally posted by: Mahogany
originally posted by: jjkenobi
Cohen also asked Gauger to create a Twitter account with the handle @WomenForCohen that would be run by a female friend of Gauger's to portray Cohen as a "sex symbol" and hype his statements in favor of Trump's presidential campaign, the Journal reported.
"Women who love and support Michael Cohen. Strong, pit bull, sex symbol, no nonsense, business oriented, and ready to make a difference!" reads the account profile. The profile was created in May 2016 and remains active with just 527 followers as of Thursday morning.
This dude is a real winner. Does he have any evidence that Trump asked him to do these things?
www.usatoday.com...
No. The Special Counsel does... they raided Cohen's office and took all the evidence. It's in the article.
Cohen is a liar, why should we suddenly believe him? Oh, because Orange Man Bad?
Don't buy it.
Evidence.
Testimony alone doesn't convict.
You mean testimony where he got in trouble for lying doesn't count in YOUR opinion. The majority of the rest of the planet will most certainly disagree with YOUR opinion if that is what it is.
They raided Cohen's office and retrieved evidence.
Where the evidence does not support the testimony, or the testimony doesn't support the evidence, there is doubt. Where the evidence supports the testimony, you have grounds to convict.
What you hear on the media, is just talk and could be lies, no matter who says it and which 'side' it favors.
If what is said is supported by evidence, then it is highly likely to be the truth, especially if there is no contradictory evidence.
Cohen is spilling the beans now, because what he said previously was contradicted by the evidence that the prosecution has gathered.
Just because it is on Fox News, does not mean that it will stand up in court where the criterion for determining truth is tougher.
Ok so what FOX or any MSM TV actors say? I skip all TV news and read mine they all lie even the papers but I dont get BODY language and acting from print> Please stop that insult.
The evidence Cohen is presenting is from a statement not a raided data situation. As far as I can tell it was only a statement.
Did he have hard data and photos to prove it? A Pre-election season action that violates not one law. IF so then we have a bunch of polls with issues because hindsight being 20-20 we clearly see 100% proof "cheating occurred" to sway voters for HRC. So this incident is reported after the raid of the liar Lawyer who got his hands caught in the cookie jar and is forced to come clean.
Cohen is rolling for a get out of jail free card. Only an idiot would trust a word he says without moving pictures with good sound.