It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"Happy to continue this debate on the Floor of the People’s House, but it’s clearly not productive to engage here with some of your radical followers," Scalise tweeted.
So to many in the msm;
random twitter person makes fun of AOC dancing = Republicans are bad to make fun of her
random twitter person defends AOC and advocates shooting a Republican that has been shot = ignore the story or do a headline focusing on his comment about her followers being radical.
Imagine the headlines this morning if Trump or Scalise supporters had been calling for Cortez to be shot, and she said "I am done with this debate on Twitter because Scalise supporters are being radical"
They would have condemned violent Republicans, and applauded the poor victim AOC who is being threatened
originally posted by: lakenheath24
a reply to: Grambler
Pffffft, take it to the floor for a maningful debate. Twitter is for Teenagers, not serious political debate from some old man. As far as OC goes, she probably gets it far worse as seen on this site.
I swear politics is like watching 3rd graders fuss.
originally posted by: FrostyFlakes
3rd graders fussing.
I think its a tactic to weaken USA. The population has alot of weaponry, you dont want to attack directly, so you weaken the minds and behavior of as many of the gun owners and purdy soon half the gun holders are now willing (due to ignorance and emotional driven thinking mistakes) to help (invaders) against the other half.
The enemy has patriotic Americans using Marquiss of Queensbury rules while CNN etc are fighting dirty. Dumb people are prime for taking advantage of. USA is collectively dumb.
21 trillion and counting...money means little to 3rd graders...orange man say bad word.
a reply to: lakenheath24
originally posted by: odzeandennz
Then which Democrats are making fun of Scalise? Just random online people as well?
You're more and more arriving to contrite conclusion based on single occurrences, blowing things out of proportion you cant just create these predicaments and accept them as facts.
So to many in the msm;
random twitter person makes fun of AOC dancing = Republicans are bad to make fun of her
random twitter person defends AOC and advocates shooting a Republican that has been shot = ignore the story or do a headline focusing on his comment about her followers being radical.
Imagine the headlines this morning if Trump or Scalise supporters had been calling for Cortez to be shot, and she said "I am done with this debate on Twitter because Scalise supporters are being radical"
They would have condemned violent Republicans, and applauded the poor victim AOC who is being threatened
First show which Democratic leader said Republicans are making fun of AOC dancing, if not for just online users who said this so as well..
Hypothetically suggesting if trump did or said 'x' then 'y' would be the outcome is purely conjecture and is simply an assumption being passed as fact..
The people who said aoc was being made fun of are part of the twittersphere as are the ones calling to snipe scalise