It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: humanoidlord
i bet you have heard of certain cases several times, roswell, rendlesham, betty and barney hill and now the nimitiz footage
you might also have wondered, what makes them special?
well the answer to this question is: nothing
the reason you have heard of them so much is because they are the cases wich the mainstream ufologists woship, because they fit their prejudiced notions of what a UFO is and they have no anomalies wich can't be explained by ETH
the AFOSI disinfo agents love this, they have been working since the late 70's to feed the ETH ruse to gullible ufologists
so if those dumb cases (note: roswell was indeed just a balloon, rendlesham was real sightings mixed with hoaxed testimonies, betty hill was a schizo and the nimitz footage is still up to debate but i ain't holding my breath) aren't the "big ones", then what are they?
carl higdon was a hunter who in 1974 got abducted by a bizzare pseudo-humanoid creature that had a extremmely ugly and deformed face and had strange metalic cones for hands, the being kidnapped higdon inside his weird box shaped vehicle along with a bunch of elk (!) wich higdon had been trying to shoot earlier
originally posted by: AM10101
ETH does fit some reports; and that's the problem I think. There's something else going on with many cases. In a lot of cases you'll have bigfoot sightings, so-called ghost lights, poltergeist activity in the witnesses' home, etc. This "woo" seems to continuously defy one concrete explanation, almost as if some other intelligence is intentionally moving the goal posts and keeping us on the cusp of a revelation but not quite there.