It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Remember the "sonic attacks" in Cuba? Yeah, now it's spreading.

page: 1
26

log in

join
share:
+3 more 
posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 03:12 PM
link   
‘V iolent Nosebleeds’ and Dogs Vomiting Blood: Victims of Cuba, China ‘Sonic’ Attacks Speak


Catherine Werner, an American diplomat diagnosed with an unexplained brain injury she received in Guangzhou, China, linked to the similar illnesses or injuries confirmed in over two dozen Americans working in Cuba cannot go back to work despite returning to the United States for treatment. According to mother Laura Hughes, who suffered similar symptoms after spending time in her daughter’s Guangzhou apartment, Werner was diagnosed with “vision, balance and hearing problems along with an organic brain injury.”


Now they're happening in China too. And they're targeting Canadian as well as American diplomatic personnel. Canada is apparently trying to cover up the incidents against its people, to avoid straining Canadian-Cuban relationships.




posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 03:17 PM
link   
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

So some food for thought.

Attacking diplomats in this manner makes no sense. Makes me wonder if the technology being used actually causes the damage as a side effect to the technology's true purpose?

Wonder what THAT could be? Mind reading? Thought recording?

Spooky stuff, huh.



posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 03:20 PM
link   
I remember the good ol' days when the "brown sound" was sufficient to do the job.
Dogs puking blood...titty fookin' Christ.

edit on 20-11-2018 by skunkape23 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 03:20 PM
link   
Psh...wait till the thousands of sattelites are launched for our "internet" we already have.



posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 03:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

So some food for thought.

Attacking diplomats in this manner makes no sense. Makes me wonder if the technology being used actually causes the damage as a side effect to the technology's true purpose?

Wonder what THAT could be? Mind reading? Thought recording?

Spooky stuff, huh.




That's a far more plausible theory assuming there is truth to these stories...



posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 03:27 PM
link   
a reply to: loam

Yeah wouldn't make sense why would they want to hurt a diplomat ? Got to be a side effect of something .



posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 03:27 PM
link   
a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

It's happened way too many times to dismiss it. Some of these people have medically documented brain damage as a result of these incidents. It is literally a weapon.



posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 03:27 PM
link   
OH NO! I bet it was the evil 5G going live!!! haha



posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 03:35 PM
link   
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

I would bet there are people in the defense department having sleepless nights trying to figure out what to heck is going on and how do you defend someone from such an attack..

These attacks could be just part of R&D on a small scale (call it proof of concept).. It would be interesting to find out where the transmitters are and their frequency and power output.. Will people have to start wearing a 4 or 5 sided micro wave door helmet ?

Since it is an area type device I wonder what else it is doing to the body since the brain is first to show degradation..?



posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 03:35 PM
link   
a reply to: Gargoyle91

Whelp, "diplomats" are sometimes spies , or so I've read in some Ludland novel or something.

But I do like the "unexpected side effects from thought reading tech" mentioned above... makes more sense than weapon testing. Plenty of poor, powerless folks in slums to do that sort of testing on.

Mind intrusion tech is not just for paranoid schizophrenic fantasy anymore... or so I read in some novel, heh.

Gee whiz, this world is swell, huh? I can't wait to see what the nifty weapons researchers come up with next!



posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 03:42 PM
link   
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan


Some of these people have medically documented brain damage as a result of these incidents.
Not really "documented", as such. The damage diagnoses were based on psychological testing which may have been flawed.

Leighton and other scientists have questioned whether the JAMA paper actually measured harm caused by a sonic attack. One symptom investigated in the study, white matter changes in the brain, made headlines. White matter is composed of axons, the long extensions of nerve cells that connect different parts of the brain.

“As a result, people got the impression this was some sort of ultrasonic death rifle,” Leighton says. But only three people in the study had white matter abnormalities, and the researchers couldn’t attribute those changes to a sonic attack. They may just have been physical differences that those people’s brains had all along.

What’s more, in the JAMA study, scores that classified diplomats as having a deficit in brain function fall into humans’ normal variation, says Sergio Della Sala, a cognitive neuroscientist at the University of Edinburgh.



In an experiment, Della Sala and University of Edinburgh colleague Robert McIntosh substituted random numbers for diplomats’ test scores and ran a simulation of possible outcomes, using the standards from the JAMA study. The result? “Everybody tested would result affected, everybody. To make sure, we repeated the simulation 1,000 times,” Della Sala wrote in an email.

www.sciencenews.org...


In four separate letters to the Journal of the American Medical Association, which published the original medical study, groups of doctors specialising in neurology, neuropsychiatry and neuropsychology described what they believed were major flaws in the study.

Among the criticisms, published on Tuesday, are that the University of Pennsylvania team which assessed the diplomats misinterpreted test results, overlooked common disorders that might have made the workers feel sick, or dismissed psychological explanations for their symptoms. Doctors at the University of Pennsylvania defended their report in a formal response in the journal, but the specialists told the Guardian they stood by their criticisms.
www.theguardian.com...


edit on 11/20/2018 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 04:38 PM
link   
microcystins paper

Perhaps it is not a sonic weapon attack, but is Cyanobacteria toxins or microcystins from algae blooms either getting into the water supply or being aerosolised. The symptoms are very similar. Could be a lot of poeople have been getting this but it only hits the news because they are diplomats or someone could be poisoning their water.

cyanobacteria toxins
edit on 20-11-2018 by CthulhuMythos because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 04:59 PM
link   
Guys, perhaps it's more along the lines of some advance listening device.

Whatever it uses to penetrate the walls to observe and listen must be what is causing those symptoms, most likely as a side effect of prolong exposure.

The Chinese probably have tons of spies in Cuba.



posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 05:02 PM
link   
This might be US job. It's much easier to test something on subjects that you can later do med exams on.



posted on Nov, 20 2018 @ 06:02 PM
link   
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

I am certain the US already has this technology themselves and probably far more highly developed as well as directed microwave weapon's whose symptom's can appear in victim's as brain damage.
So it is logical, the US should do as was done to them but likewise completely in secret, an eye for an eye since this is undoubtedly state sanctioned not individual attack's, they should find state's were there suspected attacker outside the US such as embassy's of China - if they are completely comfortable that the Attack was made by China and do unto them but importantly it should be on a much, much larger scale in order to send a message push and we shall push back.

To not respond in kind is actually to show weakness and make those responsible feel as if they are secure in this action so they shall do it again and again.

Personally I would use long range microwave weapon's, they are virtually undetectable since they are a narrow beam and it sound's almost as if a similar technology was used by the aggressor.
Certainly the Chinese have been making rapid inroads into this field of study with directed energy weapon's but they are still likely to be decades behind the west unless they were able to hack the information from some idiot's unprotected data base somewhere but even if they were able to obtain the information that way the expert's in the field with the real knowledge would still be in the west.
Some frequency of microwave weapon's can cause embolism like injury's to the brain or interfere with the nervous system even triggering heart attack's so as you can see the CIA or rather some branch of it will definitely already have that technology since it is too useful not too and can be used for clinical assassination's without drawing too much attention since the symptom's would appear as natural death's.
Also the US need's to invest in making it's staff accommodations on the site or there embassy's with little america's if you like, they could then use there own blocking technology to render such directed weapon's useless and also using specialized detectors to identify attack's and attack sources, basically they need to make there embassy compound's as secure as EW hardened military sites and to treat them as forward stations, since Embassy's and by default Embassy staff accommodation's (though to a far lesser extent if external to the embassy compound) are regarded as sovereign territory to the nation whose embassy it is then if this was an attack by a foreign power it is actually an act of war.

www.directedenergyweapons.net...
In case this Url is too long here is the video from the site.


So we had this from the 60's, how far behind are the Chinese by this and if we want to return the favor upon them of what they have done to the US embassy and probably our own as well as the Canadian's then why in the blazes are we NOT doing so now when in fact we very definitely really, really should be.


BUT there is one other fact.
We don't know that it was the Chinese or anyone else, we DO know the US has this technology and COULD they have been using this on there own staff?.
You see my response is strike back and of course that would be most people's response so is this actually what you call a false flag attack to get us to be defensive and to support there plan's to attack a nation that has not then attacked them?.

edit on 20-11-2018 by LABTECH767 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 21 2018 @ 08:35 AM
link   
Saw this the other day, since its related I'll share:

spectrum.ieee.org...



new topics

top topics



 
26

log in

join