Fox's defense of CNN lawsuit over Acosta shows corrupt MSM sticks together

originally posted by: UKTruth
I did not use the word shoved - you just did.

I say, good chap, when using the Queens English, 'forcibly pushing someone away' implies shoving, as, when one pushes them away, they are no longer as close to as when you began your forcible interdiction. Cheerio, pip pip, and all that.

Have a warm beer on me.

a reply to: Grambler

All things are in flux. They may be targets of the WH eventually. Self interest. It's also the right thing, so.....

EXTRA! EXTRA! Read All About It!

The Latest: Breaking News:
Judge says White House must immediately return press credentials of CNN’s Jim Acosta
The Latest: CNN's Acosta is he's ready to 'go back to work'
www.yahoo.com...

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: UKTruth
I did not use the word shoved - you just did.

I say, good chap, when using the Queens English, 'forcibly pushing someone away' implies shoving, as, when one pushes them away, they are no longer as close to as when you began your forcible interdiction. Cheerio, pip pip, and all that.

Have a warm beer on me.

Are you still on that?
Good lord, lol.


p.s. it would be 'old chap', not 'good chap'.

originally posted by: UKTruth
p.s. it would be 'old chap', not 'good chap'.

I'm neither old nor good

a reply to: UKTruth

Pardon me? Pushing the lady's arm down to stop her taking the mic is not forceful?

Poor dear

Thank god for the me too movement - and double thanks for the protection of the White House. Women everywhere are ever so grateful

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: FlyingFox

originally posted by: Grambler
Acosta was not doing his job well.

He refused to give up the mic when directed to.

Acosta treated the White House aid like she was a walk-on in an episode of Cops.

He made the inane mistake of yanking back on the microphone when it was being grabbed. This is a reflex action for a journalist.

Problem is, it wasn't his mic, not this time. His bad.

For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

He was yanking the microphone back because she was trying to yank the microphone away.

It's simple physics.

I understand physics. Do you understand who owned the microphone?

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: FlyingFox

originally posted by: Grambler
Acosta was not doing his job well.

He refused to give up the mic when directed to.

Acosta treated the White House aid like she was a walk-on in an episode of Cops.

He made the inane mistake of yanking back on the microphone when it was being grabbed. This is a reflex action for a journalist.

Problem is, it wasn't his mic, not this time. His bad.

For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

He was yanking the microphone back because she was trying to yank the microphone away.

It's simple physics.

I understand physics. Do you understand who owned the microphone?

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: FlyingFox

originally posted by: Grambler
Acosta was not doing his job well.

He refused to give up the mic when directed to.

Acosta treated the White House aid like she was a walk-on in an episode of Cops.

He made the inane mistake of yanking back on the microphone when it was being grabbed. This is a reflex action for a journalist.

Problem is, it wasn't his mic, not this time. His bad.

For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

He was yanking the microphone back because she was trying to yank the microphone away.

It's simple physics.

I understand physics. Do you understand who owned the microphone?

a reply to: Grambler

Even Online News Sites are Guilty of Dishing Out Disinformation , CNN and FOX Included . To " FIND " " Reliable Sources " Nowadays , is like Looking for an Imaginary Treasure on Oak Island , and Actually Finding it .......

originally posted by: FlyingFox

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: FlyingFox

originally posted by: Grambler
Acosta was not doing his job well.

He refused to give up the mic when directed to.

Acosta treated the White House aid like she was a walk-on in an episode of Cops.

He made the inane mistake of yanking back on the microphone when it was being grabbed. This is a reflex action for a journalist.

Problem is, it wasn't his mic, not this time. His bad.

For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

He was yanking the microphone back because she was trying to yank the microphone away.

It's simple physics.

I understand physics. Do you understand who owned the microphone?

There is this old saying that possession is nine tenth's of the law.



But seriously, do you think he intended to steal the microphone away, or perhaps to say his piece, get an actual answer and then give it back?

a reply to: chr0naut

" But seriously, do you think he intended to steal the microphone away, or perhaps to say his piece, get an actual answer and then give it back? "


Or have the President step[ Down from the Podium , walk over to Jimmy Boy , Slap him in the Face and take the Microphone away from him in a Sincere Effort of Reestablishing Public Decorum in that Press Conference ? ..Hmm....