It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Any evidence of pre setup?

page: 10
4
<< 7  8  9   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 5 2018 @ 03:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: democracydemo
a reply to: neutronflux

Correct ,the booms (sound) that start prior to visual (light) of the collapse and continues as collapse progress.

Source of the booms are not air condition units nor transformers, but evidence of pre setup explosive material...exploding.


Based on what evidence.
Again. Just for you.

Which I replied there could be several reasons for what your referred to as booms. Then posted videos of exploding AC units and transformers.

Now. Do you have evidence of a pressure wave with the force to cut steel columns. Again, specially in the context of a supposed CD the WTC buildings had no traps to capture ejected shrapnel that would had sprayed the streets, and caused very specific evidence, damage, and injuries.



Katie Bender's family commemorate 20 years since Royal Canberra Hospital implosion


www.canberratimes.com.au...

The public's attendance was encouraged by the then ACT Liberal Government. Katie was standing more than 400m away from the explosion but killed instantly when she was hit by a piece of flying steel.

Break

Seconds after the explosion on that Sunday afternoon, Katie was was killed instantly by a steel fragment sent flying from 430 metres across the lake. It was thought to be travelling at 140km/h.



What detonations cutting structural members looks like. No confusion or doubts they might be there.



Canberra Hospital Implosion 1997

m.youtube.com...


There were about 48 core columns alone in the twin towers that were supposedly cut without the ejection of material to initiate collapse. While the building was bowing inward. With no evidence of a pressure wave cutting steel?



the-pre-collapse-inward-bowing-of-wtc2.t4760/

www.metabunk.org...


For WTC 7, you can see evidence of internal progressive collapse through WTC 7’s windows, but no evidence of explosives with the force to cut steel columns

It’s sad to see you unable to grasp there is zero evidence of explosions with the power to cut steel columns with no possibly that planted explosives could survive the jet impacts and fires. Especially in the context of the towers where the collapse of the towers started in areas of the jet impacts.
edit on 5-12-2018 by neutronflux because: Fixed this and that

edit on 5-12-2018 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed

edit on 5-12-2018 by neutronflux because: Fixed quote




posted on Dec, 5 2018 @ 03:16 PM
link   
a reply to: democracydemo

Please link or post to “visual (light) of the collapse”. What does that even mean? Items falling and visible in the building windows?



posted on Dec, 5 2018 @ 04:07 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux
Photons dear neutron, and the speed of em.

start again @ 14:40 marker
edit on 5-12-2018 by democracydemo because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 5 2018 @ 08:17 PM
link   
a reply to: democracydemo

Video that kills your own theory. Sad.

One


Bell J-2A helicopter at 100 ft (100 dB).

Which is eight times as loud as 70 dB.
www.chem.purdue.edu...



Structural Steel cutting charges are at least 130 dB. 120 dB is 32 times louder than 70 dB.

Cutting charges would be clearly heard over the sound of the helicopter in the video.

Two. There was no flashing indicative of steel cutting charges setting off. Especially in the context of supposedly removing the resistance floor by floor.

Below is what a prepared building for implosion looks like. Notice actual flashes from charges setting off.



coolest building implosion

m.youtube.com...


Let’s recap. Your tantrum of trying to create proof of charges cutting structural steel out of thin air is pitiful.

The twin towers did not fall through the path of greatest resistance. The vertical columns were the last things to topple, after the complete collapse of the floor system.

There is zero evidence of CD

You have not presented any evidence of flashing from the detonation of planted pyrotechnics.

You own video betrayed you. There is no 130 dB blasts indicative of charges with the force to cut structural steel that should have been easily heard above the sound of the helicopter.

The collapse initiation of WTC 2 shows inward bowing and buckling. There is no evidence of a shockwave with the force to cut steel while the tower walls are being drawn inward. No ejection of material being hurled out of the building at 140km/h. Especially for a building not setup to capture shrapnel like a normal implosion. With no effort to remove pieces of the structure to minimize the ejection of material.



www.metabunk.org...

the-pre-collapse-inward-bowing-of-wtc2.t4760/



Your booms are in line with ac units exploding in sound and magnitude. Or other items common to large buildings.

And any planted charges would not have survived the jet impacts and fires to initiate collapse in the areas of jet impacts.

Your arguments are sad, let it go. Or do you want to keep using “evidence” that contradicts and betrays your narrative.
edit on 5-12-2018 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed



posted on Dec, 5 2018 @ 08:41 PM
link   
a reply to: democracydemo

More on tower flashing of light.


explained-flashes-of-light-during-the-world-trade-center-collapse.t10224/

www.metabunk.org...



posted on Dec, 7 2018 @ 04:49 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux




Bell J-2A helicopter at 100 ft (100 dB). Which is eight times as loud as 70 dB.

Yes at 100ft
Mr. Huibregtse was not at 100ft. He was at 292 Greenwich Street.



posted on Dec, 7 2018 @ 05:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: democracydemo
a reply to: neutronflux




Bell J-2A helicopter at 100 ft (100 dB). Which is eight times as loud as 70 dB.

Yes at 100ft
Mr. Huibregtse was not at 100ft. He was at 292 Greenwich Street.



What does that have to do with the helicopter was not stationary, was flying around the towers, detonations of explosives with the power to cut steel would be on a whole magnitude of loudness greater than the helicopter, and you still have zero evidence of detonations with the force to cut steel columns, and with no explanation how the CD systems survived jet impacts and fires.




top topics



 
4
<< 7  8  9   >>

log in

join