What percent DNA before you are considered Native American? Question to liberals.

Well, this question seems to be of interest only to tribe Trump.

So let’s establish a bit of precedence.


How much black blood was a person allowed to have before they were officially considered to be just 3/5’s human?

One drop rule.

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: InTheLight
I'm outta here, no reasoning or debate to be had.

I did not realize there was a debate going on. You said percentage did not matter, I asked a question. It seems like you simply do not want to answer and give your opinion, very odd.

You quoted:

"So 0% and I am Native American" - very odd.

You claimed percentage did not matter. If it does not matter then with 0% Native American DNA am I Native American? If I am not then why not based on your statement percentage does not matter?

originally posted by: Bigburgh

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: OccamsRazor04


Heard it was a minimum of 16%

Elizabeth Warren - 0.09%

That's far more than she has..😊

Actually, the DNA expert admitted he didn't test for actual North American Indian DNA...instead tested for Peruvian and Columbian.

I know she qualifies as White because it's 99.99%

😎

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: InTheLight
I'm outta here, no reasoning or debate to be had.

I did not realize there was a debate going on. You said percentage did not matter, I asked a question. It seems like you simply do not want to answer and give your opinion, very odd.

You quoted:

"So 0% and I am Native American" - very odd.

You claimed percentage did not matter. If it does not matter then with 0% Native American DNA am I Native American? If I am not then why not based on your statement percentage does not matter?

You are not getting it. There has to be a percentage to matter IMO.

originally posted by: Bhadhidar
Well, this question seems to be of interest only to tribe Trump.

So let’s establish a bit of precedence.


How much black blood was a person allowed to have before they were officially considered to be just 3/5’s human?

How about you give us your opinion on the topic at hand? Interesting you made such a long post without even addressing the topic at all. Very curious.

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Bigburgh

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: OccamsRazor04


Heard it was a minimum of 16%

Elizabeth Warren - 0.09%

That's far more than she has..

Actually, the DNA expert admitted he didn't test for actual North American Indian DNA...instead tested for Peruvian and Columbian.

That corrects down to 0.00%

😃

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: InTheLight
I'm outta here, no reasoning or debate to be had.

I did not realize there was a debate going on. You said percentage did not matter, I asked a question. It seems like you simply do not want to answer and give your opinion, very odd.

You quoted:

"So 0% and I am Native American" - very odd.

You claimed percentage did not matter. If it does not matter then with 0% Native American DNA am I Native American? If I am not then why not based on your statement percentage does not matter?

You are not getting it. There has to be a percentage to matter IMO.

If the percentage does not matter then there does not have to be a percentage to matter. You seem to be now claiming the percentage does matter. So you can tell me how much one needs before they can claim they are NA if you will.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Seems it should be at least 33.333%.

Of course the Big Story is how everyone is overlooking the fact we're all 99.99% the same DNA. Meaning we're all trivializing the 1/1024th of the 0.01% DNA we all share.

originally posted by: Breakthestreak
Although I’m not a liberal I do seem to have the ability to apply liberal logic.

And liberal logic says :zero percent, one only has to ‘identify’ as Native American and they can immediately claim to be Native American.

Unless of course you’re a non liberal who ‘identifies’ as Native American, in which case you’re simply ‘racist’.

That didn't work out so well for Rachel Dolezal.

en.m.wikipedia.org...

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

I think the 1/16 rule is a pretty good starting point.

Here's some info from the .gov's

Trace Indian Ancestry

To determine if you are eligible for membership in a federally recognized tribe, contact the tribe, or tribes, you claim ancestry from. It is the individual tribes who set tribal enrollment requirements. Additional information on tracing American Indian or Alaska Native ancestry can be found below:

Cherokee Ancestry

About 200 years ago the Cherokee Indians were one tribe, or "Indian Nation" that lived in the southeast part of what is now the United States. During the 1830's and 1840's, the period covered by the Indian Removal Act, many Cherokees were moved west to a territory that is now the State of Oklahoma. A number remained in the southeast and gathered in North Carolina where they purchased land and continued to live. Others went into the Appalachian Mountains to escape being moved west and many of their descendants may still live there now.

President Trump should get the same test done. What’s the bet he’s a higher percentage than the racist Elizabeth Warren.

Now THAT would be triggering indeed!

originally posted by: Fallingdown
Ironically she attacks trump for exaggerating .

That'd be a funny thread, actually.

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

originally posted by: Fallingdown
Ironically she attacks trump for exaggerating .

That'd be a funny thread, actually.

She does not attack Trump for exaggering, she states that he is a liar. Do you not see the difference?

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Seems it should be at least 33.333%.

Of course the Big Story is how everyone is overlooking the fact we're all 99.99% the same DNA. Meaning we're all trivializing the 1/1024th of the 0.01% DNA we all share.

So, now you are determining what percentage is acceptable?

originally posted by: Breakthestreak
President Trump should get the same test done. What’s the bet he’s a higher percentage than the racist Elizabeth Warren.

Now THAT would be triggering indeed!

Especially if he then started wearing Apache war feathers

a reply to: InTheLight

Being a habitual exaggerater isnt inherently the same thing as being a pathological liar.

And all politicians lie (including Trump).

So she attacks him for becoming what she already was (lying politician) for how many years before him?