It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: NiNjABackflip
originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: carewemust
What i find strange is we have reporters saying they don't want access to the documents. Think about this the press is saying no we don't want to see this information. And actually saying it should not be released to the public.
Very strange days when our press is demanding less documents be released.
Perhaps because they’re implicated in it. Strzok And Page, for instance, were clearly motivated by whatever showed up in their google news feeds.
originally posted by: OneArmedBandit
originally posted by: Kharron
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Kharron
Phonecalls from the leaders of the United Kingdom and Australia, and potential info that disrupts the Mueller probe, are why a wholesale declassification didn't happen this week.
Your title is extremely inaccurate. Is that by design, or do you just not comprehend what you read in that article? If it's the latter, I'm willing to help you understand what's happening with the declassification process and why.
Tip -- clicking on the links I put in the OPs will reveal where the title comes from, 99% of the time.
FYI the Failing New York Times and Washington Compost are behind a paywall.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: OneArmedBandit
originally posted by: Kharron
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Kharron
Phonecalls from the leaders of the United Kingdom and Australia, and potential info that disrupts the Mueller probe, are why a wholesale declassification didn't happen this week.
Your title is extremely inaccurate. Is that by design, or do you just not comprehend what you read in that article? If it's the latter, I'm willing to help you understand what's happening with the declassification process and why.
Tip -- clicking on the links I put in the OPs will reveal where the title comes from, 99% of the time.
FYI the Failing New York Times and Washington Compost are behind a paywall.
The New York Times is attempting to reverse it's financial nosedive today, by helping the President. (Rosenstein article). Maybe Trump will say something nice about the NYTimes at the next rally.
originally posted by: Kharron
a reply to: BlueAjah
Not true.
The DOJ is who persuaded him to back track, citing many issues out of it.
Why don't people read for information? You believe I will just accept your opinion after having read about what really happened?
Tsk, tsk.
Edit to add: Literally the first paragraph of the second link.
President Trump on Friday walked back his order earlier this week to declassify information in the ongoing probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election, saying Justice Department officials and others had persuaded him not to do so for the time being.
originally posted by: OneArmedBandit
a reply to: Lumenari
Yep, like i said in other thread, this has McCabe written all over it.
Great summary post you did here.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Lumenari
Good points. Thanks. Did you also hear today that Rosenstein is likely the "high ranking government official" who wrote the anonymous Op-Ed for the NYTimes two weeks ago?
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Lumenari
Is McCabe stupid enough to leak, even when under Grand Jury investigation?
McCabe Grand Jury: www.foxnews.com...
originally posted by: Kharron
Then why does he think it will show "bad things", and why only ask for certain pages if he does not know what they are about?
None of this is making sense; although it is excellent distraction, one must admit.