It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

WHAT is being escorted? Real or CGI?

page: 1
1

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 11:22 PM
link   
In viewing YouTube videos I came across the first one, below, and the opening sequence got my attention, see photo 1 which I've lightened to show the detail that's not visible in the video. And since one can find photos & videos of jets and helicopters seemingly escorting what could be described as UFOs, the photos/videos have to be creations for what is shown has to be unbelievrablel. I watched the rest of the video and I agreed with the comments, it was good CGI.

I watched the 2nd video and, again, the opening sequence is similar, but this time military jets are seen escorting a bizarre flying object that is seen slowly spinning. Again, the rest of the video seems to also be CGI. But I'm not saying it, others are doing so. Are the 2 opening sequences the result of CGI? I'm not easily taken and this could be one of those cases. Straighten me out.


The Best UFO Sightings Of 2018 - Part 1 - SECTION 51




Top 10 Most Popular UFO Sightings I Section 51


edit on 7-8-2018 by The Shrike because: To add content




posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 11:32 PM
link   
a reply to: The Shrike

I'm only about 5 minutes in and the first video would be much more believable if it weren't for the pyramids that follow.



posted on Aug, 7 2018 @ 11:37 PM
link   
a reply to: The Shrike

All of these are CGI.

I have seen some of the movies they are from.



posted on Aug, 8 2018 @ 12:09 AM
link   
Its a shame so many fakes exist, any real video would automatically get lumped in with the CGI so any and all videos are therefore rendered useless as evidence.



posted on Aug, 8 2018 @ 12:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: The Shrike

All of these are CGI.

I have seen some of the movies they are from.
I like a good UFO flick, any titles you can share?



posted on Aug, 8 2018 @ 04:25 AM
link   
a reply to: The Shrike

SECTION 51 is a known hoaxer. The person behind it is supposedly a CGI artist J.H. Wzgarda from France.



posted on Aug, 8 2018 @ 05:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: Osirisvset

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: The Shrike

All of these are CGI.

I have seen some of the movies they are from.
I like a good UFO flick, any titles you can share?


this is on Netflix. its a decent suspense type of thriller and abduction




posted on Aug, 8 2018 @ 07:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: The Shrike
In viewing YouTube videos I came across the first one, below, and the opening sequence got my attention, see photo 1 which I've lightened to show the detail that's not visible in the video. And since one can find photos & videos of jets and helicopters seemingly escorting what could be described as UFOs, the photos/videos have to be creations for what is shown has to be unbelievrablel. I watched the rest of the video and I agreed with the comments, it was good CGI.

I watched the 2nd video and, again, the opening sequence is similar, but this time military jets are seen escorting a bizarre flying object that is seen slowly spinning. Again, the rest of the video seems to also be CGI. But I'm not saying it, others are doing so. Are the 2 opening sequences the result of CGI? I'm not easily taken and this could be one of those cases. Straighten me out.


The Best UFO Sightings Of 2018 - Part 1 - SECTION 51




Top 10 Most Popular UFO Sightings I Section 51



They are cgi from films



posted on Aug, 8 2018 @ 05:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Osirisvset
Its a shame so many fakes exist, any real video would automatically get lumped in with the CGI so any and all videos are therefore rendered useless as evidence.


I took a couple of videos of an electrical storm back in May 28th using a smartphone. The unfortunate thing is that the first one looks like it is really badly composited - the moon has high detail as with the storm, but the buildings are compressed rather blocky and the different parts actually seem to move separately.

The second movie I took was being able to look up into a "dry" thunderstorm and see the parts like a horizontal vorticity, the mesocyclone, but it is ruined by pareidolia of a human face and a what looks like an eagle - really just a couple of vortex tubes and a spike shape. Even that's a bit blurry.

Just about any 3D animation program now support motion tracking with markers, compositing, 3D rendering with photorealistic rendering.




top topics



 
1

log in

join