TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -73N-

a reply to: CanadianMason

Do you think that's it? Just one person?

I have my own opinion on Pamphlets original involvement but I feel its evolved a lot since then.

I also think its poor behaviour towards CanadianMason

CM entered this thread undecided, he was actually persuaded and intrigued by some Q information dropped in these threads. Kept an open mind. I'd even say he was pro-Q for a long while.

However that's changed and when CM posted that his position has changed he has been attacked by a group on here.

Instead of looking at why his view may have changed. Is this thread intimidating? Aggressive. Are the good pieces of research being lost in the thread? Are the debunks put forth really any more persuasive than 5 threads ago?

This should be lesson. Everyone is so defensive of their position. Q wants to unite, don't force it on others, otherwise you are no better than those you abuse.

originally posted by: AmericanMason

originally posted by: CanadianMason
a reply to: SplinterSequence

I didn't out myself; there's nothing to out myself about. I was on the fence with Q; now I'm off. It's fake. Liars exposed.

Oh hey everyone the MASON says that Q’s a fake!


Well I have some information that might help Our viewers understand your position as a Mason. Seeing that Ive been one for a lot longer than two years.

The Masons are as bad as the Vatican.

In fact you might say they work hand in hand.

Who do you think builds all the sex dungeons?

You’ll learn that when you get out of your Mason diaper.

That's uncalled for.

Can. Mason has been a very polite person here.

Because people disagree, you are going to go after them?

Catholics do not like Masons. And vice-versa. Church decapitated most Masons back in 18th century, by 20th century a Catholic who became a Mason faced automatic excommunication....So I really don't see these groups working together in any way. The Masons I know are all pretty good folks who do good things for local communities, and drink beer. No doubt today's Vatican 100% behind Obama/Hillary/Black Hats and 100% guilt of covering up centuries of horrendous crimes.

a reply to: daskakik

So the timeline is:

"Q" 'purposely' posts trip code at 17:03:54;

"Q" posts at 17:06:20 announcing new tripcode;

Pamphlet posts as Q at 17:07:11 and 17:07:30;

Anon posts on qresearch at 17:09:07 announcing new tripcode;

"Q" posts at 17:10:28 using new tripcode.

Yeah, geniuses.

1889
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
15 Aug 2018 - 5:33:12 PM
saraacarter.com...📁
"Firewall"
Q

1890
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
15 Aug 2018 - 5:36:06 PM
New: Title TBD
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
15 Aug 2018 - 5:33:12 PM
saraacarter.com...📁
"Firewall"
Q

FIREWALL.jpg

>>159
Logical thinking.
Q

1891
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
15 Aug 2018 - 5:55:08 PM
Texts, emails (gmail), drafts (gmail), HAM comms, PS/Xbox chat logs..
JC-BO-CS-LL-#2-NO-SY
Bonus round.
Q

qmap.pub...

a reply to: MetalThunder

Indeed, it is.

New crumb #1890

qmap.pub...

a reply to: Sabrechucker

Who is the NO in 1891?

Nellie Ohr?

Cameralens,

Please indulge me in your theory.

Don't be cryptic, don't try to teach me any lessons.

Just lay it on me. Give me a timeline of events.

Why are you here? Why just today?

If you're not willing to give me straight answers, I'm not going to entertain what you have to say.

a reply to: SplinterSequence

You are intentionally misleading people into thinking....

How dare he does that!

a reply to: pavil

Probably considering the HAM reference.

a reply to: CanadianMason

You missed the most important part.

After saying, "I meant to do that", someone asks if it was because something was going down on the 23rd. Q says yes but nothing happened.

I had actually posted that as one of Q's fails before hearing about the shuffle that happened right before that prediction. The fans didn't seem to care then either.

originally posted by: SKEPTEK
New crumb #1890

qmap.pub...

So Peter Strzok communicated through XBOX chat?
Interesting.

originally posted by: pavil
a reply to: Sabrechucker

Who is the NO in 1891?

Nellie Ohr?

a reply to: daskakik

Not being sarcastic at all. Q intrigues you, doesn't matter what side your on. Start a Q Fail's Site, see how it look's against Q proofs. Check's and Balances.

Dbl