It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Voters in Los Angeles will be the first in the country to weigh in on a public banking mandate, after the City Council agreed on June 29th to put a measure on the November ballot that would allow the city to form its own bank.
The bank is expected to save the city millions, if not billions, of dollars in Wall Street fees and interest paid to bondholders, while injecting new money into the local economy, generating jobs and expanding the tax base. It could respond to the needs of its residents by reinvesting in low-income housing, critical infrastructure projects, and clean energy, as well as serving as a depository for the cannabis industry.
originally posted by: dug88
a reply to: FyreByrd
Seems like a pretty cool idea. I'm not sure i understand entirely how it works but why not? More choice is always good. And i'd rather see my money invested in things that benefit me as opposed to lining some ceo's pockets. I mean banks use my money anyway, might as well be for things that are local. Then again the way things work in theory and the way things work in practice sometimes end up totally different. But it seems as long as public banks aren't forced and other options also exist I can't see why it wouldn't be beneficial to have an alternative that, at least in theory, benefits the local area. I mean you'd hope it'd be better than some giant multinational bank but I suppose you never really know.
originally posted by: neo96
Public Banking - Yea or Nay?
Nay.
Options already exist.
Credit unions.
Crypto currency.
originally posted by: projectvxn
The concept of banking is obsolete.
The concept of government banking is well understood as a theory of economics, it just isn't any different than private banking with respect to its obsolescence.
originally posted by: projectvxn
The concept of banking is obsolete.
public bank for the city, on the other hand, would be a publicly operated financial institution that would hold funds belonging to the city and disburse them across public projects and community-based organizations based on citizens’ actual needs.
Its lending decisions would be undertaken through a transparent, City-run authority, accountable to taxpayers.
By managing all city taxes, fees, and local revenues (which are currently spread around various accounts with corporate banks), the public bank would aim to provide an alternative, socially oriented financial resource for the city’s economy.
originally posted by: Tranceopticalinclined
cryptocurrency is public banking, it's the techgeeks finger to the man and the solution to a issue of trust in a digitally open world.
we will develop it further, already we are working behind the scenes to make something that you all wont even know runs on a blockchain, but allows you to see that someone did goto school where they say or that company is behind that ad you just saw and even onwards into selling your data and even a universal basic income...
public banking is nice, when its built on code that's opensource...
originally posted by: trollz
originally posted by: projectvxn
The concept of banking is obsolete.
Yeah basically, now that everyone is carrying around a device in their pockets that can function as their own personal bank. That's the beauty of cryptocurrencies.
originally posted by: FyreByrd
originally posted by: Tranceopticalinclined
cryptocurrency is public banking, it's the techgeeks finger to the man and the solution to a issue of trust in a digitally open world.
we will develop it further, already we are working behind the scenes to make something that you all wont even know runs on a blockchain, but allows you to see that someone did goto school where they say or that company is behind that ad you just saw and even onwards into selling your data and even a universal basic income...
public banking is nice, when its built on code that's opensource...
It excludes those (primarily though not exclusively) without ready access to the internet. It cannot be usee, as it stands today, in the place of a checking, savings, or credit account for an individual or a business, let alone a city or state.
I do like and would actively support and Public Banking 'code' to be open source. Thank you.
originally posted by: Tranceopticalinclined
originally posted by: FyreByrd
originally posted by: Tranceopticalinclined
cryptocurrency is public banking, it's the techgeeks finger to the man and the solution to a issue of trust in a digitally open world.
we will develop it further, already we are working behind the scenes to make something that you all wont even know runs on a blockchain, but allows you to see that someone did goto school where they say or that company is behind that ad you just saw and even onwards into selling your data and even a universal basic income...
public banking is nice, when its built on code that's opensource...
It excludes those (primarily though not exclusively) without ready access to the internet. It cannot be usee, as it stands today, in the place of a checking, savings, or credit account for an individual or a business, let alone a city or state.
I do like and would actively support and Public Banking 'code' to be open source. Thank you.
Now, yes it does, however, now, it's all in it's infancy, users are alpha testing these concepts, from cryptokitties ( a trading card game doing more than just showing off digital collectibles, to DAO - Digitally Automated Organizations, where their rules and operations are run and governed via their blockchain, where their rules are encoded and actions are voted upon )
We need this to evolve as it will spur further innovation in the space, I'd even make the use case that public banking on the blockchain, could even spur a free global internet, via a few ways, one namely, is the sharing and allocation of ALL devices worldwide and the payment of said usage of that inter-connectivity.
It's getting pretty interesting for sure!
***that device is part of the bank, if they're miners...***
originally posted by: DontTreadOnMe
a reply to: FyreByrd
How is this different from a credit union?
Credit Unions are about as close as I want to get to public banking.
I am not in favor of it....where is the oversight?