Vid 3 UFO's crossing edge of moon, Not hiding very well, Routine Complacency? Numerous sightings

originally posted by: dothedew
Obviously, it's a fragmentated dust partical formation reflecting shadows on the video artifact due to space junk nonsensical CGI Photoshop stuffs with the hoaxing atmosphere anomolous clouds......

...... I couldn't think of a specific, automatic, typical and baseless skeptic response, so I just lumped every one I could think of together.

Amateur. You left out Venus, swamp gas, and weather balloons.

I believe in UFO's btw but I think that is an easy CGI.

a reply to: Swills

Camera tricks are cool. Seeing a REAL U.F.O would be much cooler.

From the first YT video.

Of course they are UFOs
Until someone positively identifies them
Re : UFO - Unidentified Flying Object . No , they are not swimming .
Why do most folk confuse UFOs with ET craft ? Way different terms

My bet - bugs. Or , one of the simplest tricks forging alien craft ever .

a reply to: TheJesuit

Since humans had telescopes and could look at the moon there have been "fast movers." What are they? I have no idea, but they are super interesting and fun to speculate about. Are they under intelligent control? Kinda hard to tell since they seem to be traveling in a constant direction at a constant speed. How far away from the surface of the moon are they? How far away from the lens? Are they craft or are they debris in orbit?

It's a cool find, but there's more questions than answers with that video.

You're not getting it: the point of cgi, a.i., game and green screen graphics and digital mergings...

We are no longer be able to immediately guarantee anything we see is real nor genuine.

Now, everything we do see, hear, feel and touch... will be suspect as to being real or not

originally posted by: KellyPrettyBear
Well if it's published by Putin's propaganda organization
then it must be true!

I thought that RT links were not permitted on ATS...

Kev

They have good stuff sometimes, such as the old breaking the set with abbey Martin. Plus America has its own mainstream propaganda networks. That doesn't mean that a network won't have something good every now and then. NOT every journalist is a shill on these big networks.

a reply to: blueman12

That's true.

I saw a journalist ask Trump a very embarrassing question on Fox and Friends
yesterday..

But mainly I was just saying that I thought RT links were not allowed..

Foreign media can be a breath of fresh air.. it's true.

a reply to: TheJesuit
At 1:27, the 2nd object on the far left, seems to project a shadow on the moon’s surface, between the 1st object on the right and the 3rd right lower object, as all three travel North by North West.

a reply to: TheJesuit

Round birds! Gotta love these naysayers.

If they were not real the secrecy would have stopped long ago, look at some of the released UFO pictures, why are they still mutilated so we can't properly see them?

PDF so warned.
www.cia.gov...

I think one of this guys is shown but like I said you still can't see the photos.

Clyde Tombaugh in 1931 with the telescope he used to discover Pluto

“I have seen three objects in the last seven years which defied any explanation of known phenomenon, such as Venus, atmospheric optic, meteors or planes. I am a professional, highly skilled, professional astronomer. In addition I have seen three green fireballs which were unusual in behavior from normal green fireballs…I think that several reputable scientists are being unscientific in refusing to entertain the possibility of extraterrestrial origin and nature.”

www.thinkaboutitdocs.com...

This is a weird one.

Location. Canberra Australia Date: 1974 Time: night Two young women, hearing a “strange noise,” were compelled to go outdoors to their car. They found the car out of their control and were driven to a remote site, accompanied by a brilliant light source. The car stopped and they heard a weird chant began from behind the car, and could see vague, human like forms.
They suddenly became extremely frightened and one girl, for reasons not clear, got out of the car. When she tried to get back in, she was unable to because of the presence of a viscous, web-like substance over the car door. They finally made their way to a local police station; returning to the site with officers, they found nothing and were escorted home.
On the same night police patrols in the area reported strange lights in the sky and one patrol car encountered a massive procession of snails on the road, headed in the direction of the young ladies strange encounter.

The girls experienced a repeat of their earlier experience after the police left and their fear was replaced by a feeling of guilt, as though they had “betrayed a trust” by reporting the incident to police. One girl suffered physical effects following the experiences, developing a speech impediment, and losing her ability to write. The effects were not permanent. Source: Bill Chalker, & Keith Basterfield

www.thinkaboutitdocs.com...

That is very intriguing. I'd like to know does this person film many hours of footage of the moon, has he ever captured anything similar

originally posted by: Violater1
a reply to: TheJesuit
At 1:27, the 2nd object on the far left, seems to project a shadow on the moon’s surface, between the 1st object on the right and the 3rd right lower object, as all three travel North by North West.

Yes, it appears to me that the shape of the objects vary proportionally to the lunar terrain as they fly over it. So, that would be indicative of a shadow, rather than a solid object passing in front of the lens.

If it's a fake, then somebody put a lot of time into it.

Having said that, I am pretty sure I saw this exact same video some time ago. I bet that if someone did a search here on ATS they would find the thread where this was discussed. I'm too busy right now myself.

-dex

a reply to: Swills

This YouTuber ADMITS that the first video was fake:

Tim Hallas Dark inside, light outside. Person behind me with a flashlight, double pane windows = double lights in the sky.

www.youtube.com...

IMO, his credibility is gone.

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: TheJesuit

How could it be hard in this day in age? That's the problem with all UFO videos for now on, it's too EASY to fake them. The second video is not cool, it's lame as hell. MUFON? I bet there are actual astronmers, professional and amatuer alike, who always have a telescope pointed at the Moon. I'm sure with a lot of digging you would find out this video in the your OP is fake.

Here's one, happy hunting.

www.youtube.com...

Any UNLIT object passing between the camera and the Moon would appear as a silhouette, the camera is set up to expose for the Moon I really wonder whats happened to logic or should that be lack of it today.

originally posted by: DexterRiley

Yes, it appears to me that the shape of the objects vary proportionally to the lunar terrain as they fly over it. So, that would be indicative of a shadow, rather than a solid object passing in front of the lens.

Unless of course they are birds out of focus and I see NO shadow from them on the Moon at any point.

Camera details would be handy because if we had the model zoom and exposure settings the depth of field could be calculated.