I have elsewhere speculated on the possibility that Earth was hit by a Galactic Superwave at the time of the Pleistocene extinction, as referenced by
the chemical compounds & fossilised life which has been discovered at the KT boundary layers in the sedimentation of our planet's long evolution. It
is further speculated by Dr LaViolette, in amazing detail & with much confirmatory data quoted in-line, that our own human evolution has been affected
by these 'superwaves', and even that a progenitor race which was present on Earth prior to 'the event', perhaps the Watchers of ancient lore, had left
here to avoid the impact of a forecasted superwave. However, before it hit, they created zodiac & tarot lore which ultimately would be the key to
highlighting the galactic-level capability of whomever had sent us this message. We know their technologies were fearsome, magical even - by the fact
that certain star systems (particularly pulsars) appear to be arrayed in the night sky in multi-dimensional patterns, with encoded data made known by
the tempo & behaviour of each star, with so much by way of convincing circumstantial evidence that the theory has legs even before you get to the data
surrounding the pulsar 'grid', which served multiple purposes - one of which, remarkably, was the means by which to adjust for alterations in the flow
of Time when engaged in superluminal travel between star systems, as well as to maintain correct course headings by triangulation based on pulsar
locations relative to the traveling starship. The method of action of this interstellar grid applied in many ways for transport purposes is so
wonderfully straightforward that it's almost undeniable, once you've read deeply enough into his written materials.
As a starting point, please consider reading his books, which are very engaging & satisfying reads. You can check out his published materials by
starting at Etheric.com - the website of Dr Paul LaViolette
. In his books you will find numerous references to the life &
work of T Townsend Brown. One note of caution - read his books in the order in which they were published. 'Earth Under Fire'
came first in
terms of his writing for popular audiences, according to memory, followed by 'Genesis of the Cosmos'
, then 'Decoding the Message of the
, then 'Secrets of Antigravity Research'
. His website has an excellent array of research papers, articles, forums, interviews and
so on, all of which I wholeheartedly recommend. Notice that despite the credibility of his science, he is in some ways a bit eccentric, and this fits
well with the possibility I have suggested below, that his work provides a doorway into the world of secret research, (although there is no
prerequisite condition for he himself to be aware that such is the case), disguised as the site of a crackpot. Tracking movement across the internet
is easy for the NSA, and so anyone with the right education & interests can be picked up based on their web activity.
So onward to the purpose of the thread: Once you read up on the scientific & experimental evidence for the development of technologies which
demonstrate over-unity for transport purposes by aerofoil, with the electrogravitics research in the open literature in the late 40's to early 50's,
you will see that our scientists of the time were more than capable of theorising & inventing based on principles of electrical engineering that are
not hard to understand, once the initial intuitive leap is made, and so the alleged reliance on supposed 'alien technology' from 'crashed UFOs', which
were 'reverse engineered' to develop modern technological progression in numerous fields of study, is absolutely unnecessary - we were more than
capable of developing these technologies by ourselves, and the work of both T Townsend-Brown, and Dr Paul LaViolette amply demonstrate that the
principles were/are well within our grasp. Apparently, there was an unspoken criticism of established electromagnetic theory (what Ben Rich called
'an error in the equations' (a reference to the false suppositions following on from the work of Maxwell & his electromagnetic theory - which was held
to be responsible for preventing people from realising the potential of the field of electrogravitics - and indeed, from a counter-intelligence point
of view, it was A GOOD THING
that the public were unaware of the potential for seemingly 'magical' technological developments in aerofoils &
other aspects of electrical engineering technology. If the public were made to believe that T Townsend Brown was a crank, a lone nut pseudoscientist,
then they could keep their incredible technological marvels a secret from the public, and largely, from enemy foreign governments too. Later, Dr Paul
LaViolette was also held up as an example of a crank, lone nut pseudoscientist too - but I believe that his work is the bait on the hook of the secret
space & military industrial black research world.. He is left to his work without being accosted, but anyone who has talent in physics, and an
interest in advanced research, on arriving at his website will be pinged as a potential recruit, and may be drafted into that secretive world behind
the curtain. In the case of both scientists, it seems that they were left out of the loop, out in the cold, according to different styles of
disinformation purposes - but equally, it seems they could well have been 'read in' on the reasons for that being the case, and may well have been
perfectly satisfied with their lot, perhaps even having full access privileges to certain research or aeronautical corporations.
And so, in my view, the whole 'reverse engineered crashed UFO technology' memetic is absolute bullsnip, and we should be inherently suspicious of
anyone pushing that narrative, or claiming to have been given insider information which supports that narrative. Bear in mind that in this era of
Fake News, we are rapidly awakening to the need for 'information hygiene'
as I have termed it, in the sense that the chain of transmitted or
transferred knowledge, or the sources of research (which is ideally independent), must be checkable by links in the chains of reference, suggestive
beyond reasonable doubt of genuine, verifiable, specialist training or qualifications held by the people involved &/or validated, quality research
conducted by independent, unbiased operants, so that we can trust in the veracity of the information which is being presented. This is the great
challenge of our technological age, and in a situation such as this, where we are discussing potentially classified research & development, we should
be aware of who is telling us, and what they are telling us, and why they are telling it that way.. Sounds simple enough, but a whole can of worms
can be opened up if we fail to perform the proper information hygiene checks (as I have learned on many occasions here on ATS..)
Please consider & discuss!
edit on MarchSaturday1813CDT03America/Chicago-050017 by FlyInTheOintment because: spelling, style edits